2.7Ghz vs 3.1Ghz. Help justify my purchase

Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Hi guys,

Here's the deal. I just bought a 27" 2.7Ghz i5 iMac. I am having regrets not getting the 3.1Ghz now mainly because I usually like to get the best of what's offered. Anyways, would upgrading my 2.7Ghz to 16gb offer me a great set-up or should I take my comp back and trade it in for the 3.1Ghz? I don't do any crazy photo/video editing and use the computer mainly for browsing the web/itunes/and MAYBE some gaming.

So my question is, will I have lots of fun with a 2.7ghz w/16gb or just get the 3.1Ghz as is?
 

chscag

Well-known member
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
65,248
Reaction score
1,833
Points
113
Location
Keller, Texas
Your Mac's Specs
2017 27" iMac, 10.5" iPad Pro, iPhone 8, iPhone 11, iPhone 12 Mini, Numerous iPods, Monterey
You won't notice the difference between the two as far as the CPU speed goes. The real difference is the graphics. The 3.1 GHz model has a more robust GPU with more VRAM. So, if it's speed for video editing or gaming that you want, the 3.1 GHz model would be best.
 
OP
P
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
1
You won't notice the difference between the two as far as the CPU speed goes. The real difference is the graphics. The 3.1 GHz model has a more robust GPU with more VRAM. So, if it's speed for video editing or gaming that you want, the 3.1 GHz model would be best.

Yea, I won't really be doing either of those things. So your saying the 2.7ghz with 16gb of RAM would be a nice/fast set-up?
 

chscag

Well-known member
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
65,248
Reaction score
1,833
Points
113
Location
Keller, Texas
Your Mac's Specs
2017 27" iMac, 10.5" iPad Pro, iPhone 8, iPhone 11, iPhone 12 Mini, Numerous iPods, Monterey
Yea, I won't really be doing either of those things. So your saying the 2.7ghz with 16gb of RAM would be a nice/fast set-up?

Yes, it should be fast enough. I'm currently using the 21.5" low end 2011 iMac with the same graphics and 8 GB of memory and it's fast enough for everything I do. Like you, I don't game or do video editing.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
263
Reaction score
5
Points
18
Location
Las Vegas
Your Mac's Specs
2010 i3 27" 16gb Ram
Actually most places like Newegg you can upgrade to 16gb of ram for Under $100 I upped my Mini to 16gb for $65 when they had it on sale. meaning the imac with that same pricing could get 32gb for $130
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2012
Messages
263
Reaction score
13
Points
18
Location
Atlanta, GA
Your Mac's Specs
27" iMac (Mid 2011), 3.4GHz Intel Core i7, 16GB RAM, 2GB Video Card, 2TB HDD
Actually most places like Newegg you can upgrade to 16gb of ram for Under $100 I upped my Mini to 16gb for $65 when they had it on sale. meaning the imac with that same pricing could get 32gb for $130

I didn't see that sale so I can't say for sure that it would have been $130 for 32GB but I doubt it was. To get 32GB, you have to use 8GB chips which are still somewhat new and much more expensive than 4GB.

To get 16GB on OWC, it's $110 but to go to 32GB it jumps to $320. Apple still doesn't officially support 32GB on the iMac and I've read online how some people have made that upgrade and started having some problems with the computer such as kernel panics that they never got with 16GB. 16BG of RAM is a whole lot of memory anyway. 95% of the average users out there will never come close to actually using that much.

Let me put 16BG in perspective. I currently have Mail, iTunes, Safari (4 tabs open), Logic Pro, Garageband, Final Cut Pro, Motion, iMovie, Photoshop CS5, and iPhoto all open at the moment and out of my 16GB of RAM, I still have 71% of my memory available.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top