HST_Gonzo said:
He didn't want video either.
Perhaps, but the key is that
you get to choose what you play, which is in the spirit of what Apple wants.
Steve Jobs' philosophy centers on control. You can control what you download from iTunes, you can control what you rip from CD, you can control what you load on your iPod, audio or video.
Radio, traditional broadcasting or satellite, causes the user to relinquish control over the content and quality. You may subscribe to the all-70s channel on Sirius, but you get no choice as to when and if you hear "Afternoon Delight" or "Band on the Run."
Also, you have no control over whether the signal is making it to the device okay: radio requires a reliance on a stable, clear signal from a transmitter and that the receiver can get that signal under all circumstances.
If a user gets frustrated with the content or the delivery of that content, they like the device less. And every single instance of someone getting frustrated with their device is potentially another step towards that device's firm ensconcement in a drawer somewhere. I think that goes against Apple's business plan.
My money is on "no radio, terrestrial or otherwise, with the iPod."
Anyone want to take the other side of this in a gentleman's bet?