Virtualization vs Remote desktop for analytics

Joined
Nov 25, 2010
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
1
I am a dedicated Mac user. However, I am also a data analyst. Sometimes the programs I need to run analysis only comes in a Windows version. I deal with stats, data mining, a little SQL type stuff. I even need the Windows Excel due to add-ins, etc. My data is rarely over 10GB. Most is far less than that.

Here is my question- I am better off running a virtualization side on my Mac (ie Parallels) or to buy a Windows desktop/server, load the Windows programs into it and then remote desktop in from my Mac. Thus I am running the analysis process on the Windows machine.

Upsides and downsides? Comments?

Thanks
 

chscag

Well-known member
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
65,248
Reaction score
1,833
Points
113
Location
Keller, Texas
Your Mac's Specs
2017 27" iMac, 10.5" iPad Pro, iPhone 8, iPhone 11, iPhone 12 Mini, Numerous iPods, Monterey
Your usage almost certainly can be done through virtualization. Either Parallels, Fusion, or even the free VirtualBox should be able to run those programs you indicated. Unless you really want a Windows desktop server for other reasons, running virtual software should be fine.
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
937
Reaction score
18
Points
18
+1 here for VMs. Virtual machines run the Office software perfectly well. You would only need native hardware access for applications requiring high end graphics support. Excel will run perfectly well in a VM.

Cheers
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top