Upgrading to SSD Question about SATA

Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Points
1
I have an iMac 5,1 White Intel Core 2 Duo. I want to upgrade to a solid state hard drive. I currently have 250GB Hard Drive SATA. When I buy the new SSD should I get SATA, SATA II, or SATA III regarding which ones are compatable?
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
6,879
Reaction score
191
Points
63
Location
Tucson, AZ
Your Mac's Specs
Way... way too many specs to list.
the 5,1 has a 1.5 Gbps Serial ATA (SATA) interface. This is SATA. SATA II is 3.0Gbps, SATA III is 6.0Gbps. As far as I am aware, the spec is that SATA III will downstep to all previous interface speeds, but if you can get a 1.5Gbps SSD cheaper, that would be a no brainer.
 
OP
D
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Ok You've givin' me good information. I think I will opt for a SATA. I don't want the new drive to have to down step just in case that is not as nice.
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Points
6
SATA III is backwards compatible, but i dont think that your imac will support SATA III anyways. (correct me if im wrong anyway). Either way if your just doing regular day to day computer usage, there is not really any point in forking out the extra cash for a STAT III because you wont notice the difference.
 
OP
D
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Points
1
If anyone wants to know there are still adapters to put 2.5" drives in a 3.5" bay. Most of the 2.5" SSD are way cheaper than the 3.5" Honestly, I haven't done it for myself yet but it's what I plan on doing to this Mac.
 

chscag

Well-known member
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
65,248
Reaction score
1,833
Points
113
Location
Keller, Texas
Your Mac's Specs
2017 27" iMac, 10.5" iPad Pro, iPhone 8, iPhone 11, iPhone 12 Mini, Numerous iPods, Monterey
I tend to disagree about substituting a 2.5" drive for a 3.5" simply because experience over the years has shown that the larger drives outlast the smaller ones. But that's up to you and there does seem to be a better selection of 2.5" drives available.
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
6,879
Reaction score
191
Points
63
Location
Tucson, AZ
Your Mac's Specs
Way... way too many specs to list.
I tend to disagree about substituting a 2.5" drive for a 3.5" simply because experience over the years has shown that the larger drives outlast the smaller ones. But that's up to you and there does seem to be a better selection of 2.5" drives available.

Yea, but even in the Enterprise level drives, 2.5's are taking over.
 
OP
D
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Do the 2.5" drives not last as long because they are usually in portable computers and get ruined by all the bumps and movin' around. To be honest. We really are talking about the size of the drive now days.
 

dtravis7


Retired Staff
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
30,133
Reaction score
703
Points
113
Location
Modesto, Ca.
Your Mac's Specs
MacMini M-1 MacOS Monterey, iMac 2010 27"Quad I7 , MBPLate2011, iPad Pro10.5", iPhoneSE
Just a heads up, I have seen many older Intel Macs that had serious issues with a SATA 2 drive installed. WD and Seagate has a Limit jumper that sets it for the older SATA 1.5 instead of 3.0 and that solves it. We have a user here with a older Mini that ran into that very issue so I told him to put on the jumper. I am not sure if SSD's have that Limit Jumper on them.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top