- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
Hello!
I am trying to comprehend the requirements of HD video editing. I would preffer to go with as low cost as possible, but I also don't want to leave out something I could have gotten now for a couple of hundred and shall be missing in a couple of years.
I am debating between the smaller iMacs (latest model) - that much I have managed to narrow down. I know many would recommend the larger screen, but since I am used to 13" screen, 21,5" shall be a big leap already and I have decided it shall be enough (I can always get an extra screen, right?). However, performancewise I would love to get some advise from people that actually have done HD-editing.
Processor: Should I go for quad core i7 if I can afford it and why? Or would quad core i5 be sufficient? I was actually told by someone that i5 should be enough as long as I get as much RAM as I can. Is this so, and would I still be thinking it is enough after 2-3 years?
RAM: That much I have understood that I cannot have too much RAM. I am, however, going to go with the 4GB coming with the computer first, then start upgrading, probably first adding 2x4 GB, since I read adding RAM memory is rather easy.
Memory: 500 GB versus 1 terabite? I would guess 1 terabite would be prefferrable even though someone told me there's no point and that I should get external memories anyhow.
From what I've read as far as I've understood the cheapest iMac with i5, 4 GB RAM and 500 GB hard drive would be "enough" (or minimum requirement).
However, I keep on wondering whether in a couple of years I would regret not going for the more expensive one - would 1 terabite and/or i7 be worth it in longer run? Besides HD -video editing I'm going to use it for photo editing.
Thank you for any replies!
Elina
I am trying to comprehend the requirements of HD video editing. I would preffer to go with as low cost as possible, but I also don't want to leave out something I could have gotten now for a couple of hundred and shall be missing in a couple of years.
I am debating between the smaller iMacs (latest model) - that much I have managed to narrow down. I know many would recommend the larger screen, but since I am used to 13" screen, 21,5" shall be a big leap already and I have decided it shall be enough (I can always get an extra screen, right?). However, performancewise I would love to get some advise from people that actually have done HD-editing.
Processor: Should I go for quad core i7 if I can afford it and why? Or would quad core i5 be sufficient? I was actually told by someone that i5 should be enough as long as I get as much RAM as I can. Is this so, and would I still be thinking it is enough after 2-3 years?
RAM: That much I have understood that I cannot have too much RAM. I am, however, going to go with the 4GB coming with the computer first, then start upgrading, probably first adding 2x4 GB, since I read adding RAM memory is rather easy.
Memory: 500 GB versus 1 terabite? I would guess 1 terabite would be prefferrable even though someone told me there's no point and that I should get external memories anyhow.
From what I've read as far as I've understood the cheapest iMac with i5, 4 GB RAM and 500 GB hard drive would be "enough" (or minimum requirement).
However, I keep on wondering whether in a couple of years I would regret not going for the more expensive one - would 1 terabite and/or i7 be worth it in longer run? Besides HD -video editing I'm going to use it for photo editing.
Thank you for any replies!
Elina