• Welcome to the Off-Topic/Schweb's Lounge

    In addition to the Mac-Forums Community Guidelines, there are a few things you should pay attention to while in The Lounge.

    Lounge Rules
    • If your post belongs in a different forum, please post it there.
    • While this area is for off-topic conversations, that doesn't mean that every conversation will be permitted. The moderators will, at their sole discretion, close or delete any threads which do not serve a beneficial purpose to the community.

    Understand that while The Lounge is here as a place to relax and discuss random topics, that doesn't mean we will allow any topic. Topics which are inflammatory, hurtful, or otherwise clash with our Mac-Forums Community Guidelines will be removed.

viruses and spyware

Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Your Mac's Specs
MacPro 3.1
I heard from a friend that Apple Macs are less susceptible to viruses. His reasoning behind this is that most of the sad individuals that program viruses tend not to target macs. How much truth is there in this? Does this mean that if (hypothetically) I was to use P2P sharing then I would be less at risk to viruses and spyware?
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
913
Reaction score
38
Points
28
Location
Oklahoma
hojkoff_101 said:
I heard from a friend that Apple Macs are less susceptible to viruses. His reasoning behind this is that most of the sad individuals that program viruses tend not to target macs. How much truth is there in this? Does this mean that if (hypothetically) I was to use P2P sharing then I would be less at risk to viruses and spyware?

Yes, it does for the simple reason that at this time, and probably will change when the "Intell Macs come out", very few virus/spyware writers bother to write for the Mac. Why waist your time writing for 3 million people when you can write for 10 million.

Now, on the other hand even though virus and such for the Mac are rare, if you are connected to a lan in which there are pc's, you could be able to pick up a pc virus and pass it on to the pc. That would be the reason to run both firewalls and virus protection on the Mac.
 
Joined
Apr 23, 2005
Messages
1,509
Reaction score
47
Points
48
Location
Cape Cod, MA
Your Mac's Specs
iBook
if you run your computer in a network with PC's then you should use virus protections, as james said. Apples also have many built in protections and i've been told it is hard to make a virus for one.
 
L

lil

Guest
Not so much the fact that it's PPC vs. Intel - more the fact that OS X sits on a BSD based foundation; which has a more secure design from the ground-up than Windows does. (Witness the situation with Vista...)

Of course Mac virus' would affect less people and people with mallicious intent would probably wish to affect more people.

That said, OS 9 and earlier did have its fair share of Virus attacks, so it adds a little bit of weight to the argument that OS X is inherently more secure than Windows.

i wouldn't wish to say inpenetrable though...

Vicky
 
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
6,999
Reaction score
187
Points
63
Location
Hamilton College
Your Mac's Specs
20" iMac C2D 2.16ghz, 13" MacBook 2.0ghz, 60gb iPod vid, 1gb nano
James said:
if you are connected to a lan in which there are pc's, you could be able to pick up a pc virus and pass it on to the pc.

Only way you could do that is if you actually took the file and dragged it to the PC yourself. The viruses can't just go through a mac on their own.
 
OP
hojkoff_101
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Your Mac's Specs
MacPro 3.1
lil said:
i wouldn't wish to say inpenetrable though...

Oh no I know. But it does seem that these days when you connect up to the internet your computer is flooded with crap. I just hope that it doesn't happen to my new Apple.

I'm gonig to get Norton. Will the Apple version defend me against PC based viruses lurking around deep in my Apple?
 
OP
hojkoff_101
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Your Mac's Specs
MacPro 3.1
James said:
probably will change when the "Intell Macs come out",

Isn't the Intel part only the chip in the computer? I thought that viruses only went at the OS? So even when the intel stuff does come out mac uses will still get the same extra bit of protection as the OS hasn't changed. I may be wrong though. I only really know what I'm half talking about really.
 
L

lil

Guest
Yes norton will find PC virus'; that's all it can find - as no OS X ones exist.

As regards to x86 being more vulnerable as chip to virus' than PPC; that's not the case as you say, PC virus' attack Windows based weaknesses for the most part, so if Windows isn't there, a Windows virus won't work. Witness how you can get a virus on Virtual PC running Windows, yet really it's on OS X and on a PPC processor.

As such it's not x86 that's a weakness, it's Windows.

After all, how many virus writers these days are actually going to program in x86 assembler, and find an actual weakness in the CPU? FDIV was the last such example on x86 that was a hardware bug that caused crashes.

(FDIV allowed 7/0, 255/0 etc. which should cause a divide by zero error, on the few 60 and 66MHz Pentiums affected, it wouldn't and it'd crash).

As such being as no one programs virus' in x86 assembler, it won't suddenly mean OS X becomes vulnerable, as most programming these days is in high level code, meaning C++ which is used very prevalently for Windows application development.

of course if you manage to hack your Mac-intel to run Windows (hypothetically speaking) outside of something like Virtual PC then yes - bring on the spyware and virus attacks ;)

Vicky
 
L

lil

Guest
One word for you:

Symantec.

The people who make Norton have recently spearheaded a campaign to sell more of their anti-virus software on the Mac by scaring people into buying it. Rest assured, I have been using OS X since 2001; and not run a virus checker and been fine. That doesn't mean you shouldn't - but remember, marketing speak ;)

Definitions:

x86: In the simplest sense meaning Intel Pentium processors.

More accurately meaning a processor derived on x86 architecture. The first chips used in IBM PCs were 8088s. but then the 80286 (286), 80386 (386), 80486 (486) and unofficially the Pentium was the 80586 or 586 - the x means just any number in the x86 processor series from Intel. So when I say x86 and others do, it generally means Intels 386, 486, Pentium and above CPU architecture.

PPC - PowerPC.

VirtualPC - PC Emulator. originally from Connectix but bought out by Microsoft. Allows you to run operating systems and software designed for the x86 PC platform, such as Windows.

Hope this helps!

Vicky
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
913
Reaction score
38
Points
28
Location
Oklahoma
hojkoff_101 said:
Isn't the Intel part only the chip in the computer? I thought that viruses only went at the OS? So even when the intel stuff does come out mac uses will still get the same extra bit of protection as the OS hasn't changed. I may be wrong though. I only really know what I'm half talking about really.

Your not wrong, osx with an intel will probably be like osx with the ibm chip, the reasoning for that statement was that with the intel chip there is a lot of talk about running windows type programs on the Mac. IF ... that does come about, and we won't really know it till it comes out and it is tried, then a lot more people will be interested in buying a Mac. With more people on the Mac, then the virus writers will be more interested in writing a virus for it.

Like i said in my original message, why write for 3 million when you can write for 10 million...
 
OP
hojkoff_101
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Your Mac's Specs
MacPro 3.1
lil said:
One word for you:

Symantec.

The people who make Norton have recently spearheaded a campaign to sell more of their anti-virus software on the Mac by scaring people into buying it.

So will Norton even defend me at all? Or am I just buying the PC version that will run on a Mac? Which I presume will give me absolutely no protection from Mac viruses (the few that there are) at all and will just root out any PC viruses that happen to be on my Mac. Is this all just a big con from Norton?

What about Norton firewall? Is that any good?
 
L

lil

Guest
It's not a con because the idea is that should one ever come along, Norton wil ldownload its virus profiles as it does now, and thus defend against the virus.

It's a hypothetical thing.

Norton Firewall.... Use the built in one which OS X has (go to Sharing in System Preferences) :flower:

I personally don't use any of Symatec's products as well, no need to.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top