A
AlexN
Guest
Do you have any dead-pixel on your iBook? After carefully inspecting of mine, I'm happy to say, I have none. :biohazard
chouk said:is it true that a screen which remains static is more likely to have dead pixels?...
and that's why we have screensavers.....?
Actually, screensavers have not really served their intended purpose for quite a few years now...even on CRT's. No monitor of any type put out in the last 6-7 years or so, has had the need for a screensaver. In fact, some screensavers can do more damage than good these days. What I mean is that some of the highly graphic intense ones, can to an extent, overwork the display and cause it to (for lack of a better term) have a shorter life span. At the very least, it will use more energy to run a complex screensaver than it would to simply dim the display or turn the monitor off.rs2sensen said:Screensavers were important with CRT displays, because a static image could get "burned" onto the display. LCD screens don't have this happen, so screensavers don't serve much of a purpose