Compared a 15" Matte MBP, Glossy MBP, and 17" Matte MBP

Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Points
1
I currently have a 13" Macbook Air (current gen) and an iPad, and I'm considering replacing my air with a new Sandy Bridge MBP so I went Apple Store grazing.

Noticed a few things:

1) Resolution difference between the 15"s isn't that big of a deal
2) Matte screen however is higher contrast, higher quality screen (they didn't have a High-res non-matte on display). I put up iPhoto next to each other and compared the demo photos, the Matte one was spectacular though the regular screen was good too.
3) Macbook Pros are much slower than my Macbook Air in regular usage despite the huge power difference - SSDs are a must-have these days.

And I also noticed that putting a 15" MBP next to 17" MBP that the size of the screen really isn't substantially larger (maybe subjective) but the size of the machine literally makes on semi-portable and one not-portable-at-all. I could imagine taking a 15" MBP with me in a suitcase/bag when needed, but perish the thought with the 17".

So now it comes down to 2.3 ghz 15" High res matte 15" Macbook Pro + an Intel SSD + MCE Optibay, which would set me back exactly $3009 ($2359 + 550 + 99).

Maybe I will wait... :\
 

chscag

Well-known member
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
65,248
Reaction score
1,833
Points
113
Location
Keller, Texas
Your Mac's Specs
2017 27" iMac, 10.5" iPad Pro, iPhone 8, iPhone 11, iPhone 12 Mini, Numerous iPods, Monterey
I can't advise you on what choice to make as that's a personal decision. However, I guess my eyes are either a great deal older than yours or that I just can't see that much of a difference between the matte display and glossy as far as quality of picture goes.

I do agree with you about the 17" model. In my humble opinion, it's closer to being a desktop machine than portable. I can't imagine hauling it around for any length of time. I don't even like carrying my 13" model around. ;D
 
OP
F
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Points
1
I can't advise you on what choice to make as that's a personal decision. However, I guess my eyes are either a great deal older than yours or that I just can't see that much of a difference between the matte display and glossy as far as quality of picture goes.

I do agree with you about the 17" model. In my humble opinion, it's closer to being a desktop machine than portable. I can't imagine hauling it around for any length of time. I don't even like carrying my 13" model around. ;D

The matte display is realistic, while the glossy ones like my Macbook Air makes things look shiny and plasticky. Not a big deal but with people photos, I love the matte display.

But it's the contrast, especially in the skin tones that make the matte one stand out. Both can be improved with calibration I'm sure.
 
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
New York
Your Mac's Specs
17" Macbook Pro, 2.3 Ghz i7, 500GB 7200 RPM, 8GB ram, Radeon 6750 1GB, OS X 10.6.6
I still can't figure out how people can complain about a 7 (SEVEN) pound 17 (SEVENTEEN) inch notebook. I carry mine everywhere, including the 74 blocks (combined) to and from work. Im not trying to be a troll, im being realistic.
 

chscag

Well-known member
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
65,248
Reaction score
1,833
Points
113
Location
Keller, Texas
Your Mac's Specs
2017 27" iMac, 10.5" iPad Pro, iPhone 8, iPhone 11, iPhone 12 Mini, Numerous iPods, Monterey
Some folks don't mind lugging around a large notebook computer while others find it a drag. Personal choice like most everything else. In the "old days" I hauled around a ruggedized laptop issued by the US Government to their field reps. It was a 12 LB monster. At the time, I didn't complain about it as it was part of my job, and I was a lot younger. :)
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2009
Messages
1,272
Reaction score
67
Points
48
Location
South Carolina
Your Mac's Specs
-->
Your observations are precisely the reason that I do not mind carrying a 17" MBP around. I would not trade my matte display for much at this point. I went from a 13" MBP to my 17" and it is just a hair over 2 lbs heavier, which for me doesn't even make a difference. I would love to see the matte option across the board, not just on the 15 and 17.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
68
Reaction score
1
Points
8
Location
Ft. Lauderdale/Tallahassee
Your Mac's Specs
2011 MacBook Pro, 2.3 GHz i7, 8GB Ram, 750GB HD, Hi-Res AG screen
IMHO, if you are seriously looking to get a power house MBP and also on a budget, get the top of line 15 MBP that they carry in the store. This is what I did. 2.3GHz i7, 750GB HD, 4GB Ram, HiRes, and Matte Screen.

After you have this in your hands do the upgrades yourself. Its much cheaper to upgrade the HD and RAM yourself. Frankly, once you do it, you'll wonder why you ever spent time thinking apple should do it. Once you replace the HD with a SSD, you can take the 750GB HD, case it, and use it to store your media. Of course, this is simply what I would do, and I know my thoughts and ways don't always agree with everyone else's.
 
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
295
Reaction score
5
Points
18
Location
BoCo
Your Mac's Specs
13inch 2.3 i5 MBP 64gb SSD 320gb HD 8gb 1333
IMHO, if you are seriously looking to get a power house MBP and also on a budget, get the top of line 15 MBP that they carry in the store. This is what I did. 2.3GHz i7, 750GB HD, 4GB Ram, HiRes, and Matte Screen.

After you have this in your hands do the upgrades yourself. Its much cheaper to upgrade the HD and RAM yourself. Frankly, once you do it, you'll wonder why you ever spent time thinking apple should do it. Once you replace the HD with a SSD, you can take the 750GB HD, case it, and use it to store your media. Of course, this is simply what I would do, and I know my thoughts and ways don't always agree with everyone else's.

Its seems like he is planning on at least doing the HDD upgrade himself.

That said do you really need a 250-300gb SSD if you are using an optibay hdd as well? You could save 250 by going with a 120gb drive instead. And other optical bay HDD bays can be found for ~40 bucks.

Also there are rumors of a MBA refresh as soon as june so if you like the portability of the MBA then it might be worth it to wait and see if they come out with sandy bridge i5s. I think the screen on the MBAs look awesome with the same resolution as the normal 15inch MBP, but not matte of course.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
4,773
Reaction score
166
Points
63
Location
Central New York
Your Mac's Specs
15in i7 MacBook Pro, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD, 500GB HD
I just got a 15in hi-res glossy screen MBP. Whether you choose the matte or glossy option, do choose the hi-res screen. It's well worth the $100 upgrade cost.

I will be adding a SSD in the near future and am currently looking at OWC's Mercury Pro drives.
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Sounds like you priced yourself right out of business. No need for all that fluff - $1200+tax will get you a spectacular 13" - perfect for portability, and upgradeable at a later time to 16gig RAM, 1T hard drive, 500gig SSD, 27" Cinema displays (get 3), etc., as $ and needs permit.
 
OP
F
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Points
1
IMHO, if you are seriously looking to get a power house MBP and also on a budget, get the top of line 15 MBP that they carry in the store. This is what I did. 2.3GHz i7, 750GB HD, 4GB Ram, HiRes, and Matte Screen.

After you have this in your hands do the upgrades yourself. Its much cheaper to upgrade the HD and RAM yourself. Frankly, once you do it, you'll wonder why you ever spent time thinking apple should do it. Once you replace the HD with a SSD, you can take the 750GB HD, case it, and use it to store your media. Of course, this is simply what I would do, and I know my thoughts and ways don't always agree with everyone else's.

That was the idea - $2359 is the price of the top line model to Education Pricing.



Its seems like he is planning on at least doing the HDD upgrade himself.

That said do you really need a 250-300gb SSD if you are using an optibay hdd as well? You could save 250 by going with a 120gb drive instead. And other optical bay HDD bays can be found for ~40 bucks.

Also there are rumors of a MBA refresh as soon as june so if you like the portability of the MBA then it might be worth it to wait and see if they come out with sandy bridge i5s. I think the screen on the MBAs look awesome with the same resolution as the normal 15inch MBP, but not matte of course.

Honestly, one 300gb SSD is probably sufficient for my needs. I might just wait until Lion comes out so I don't have to buy it in 2 months.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Messages
4,695
Reaction score
73
Points
48
Location
houston texas
Your Mac's Specs
09 MBP 8GB ram 500GB HD OS 10.9 32B iPad 4 32GB iPhone 5 iOs7 2TB TC Apple TV3
Sounds like you priced yourself right out of business. No need for all that fluff - $1200+tax will get you a spectacular 13" - perfect for portability, and upgradeable at a later time to 16gig RAM, 1T hard drive, 500gig SSD, 27" Cinema displays (get 3), etc., as $ and needs permit.

He might have wanted the faster processor and better video card which are not available on the current 13's.
 
OP
F
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Points
1
He might have wanted the faster processor and better video card which are not available on the current 13's.

I have a Macbook Air which already has a better GPU than the 13" Macbook Pro.

Processor speed bump is pretty pointless to me without the gaming GPU capability, otherwise I'm perfectly fine with my 2.13ghz Core 2 duo.

I would like a 13" Macbook Pro that's quad core with the 6750 and the Macbook Air screen of course, but who wouldn't. :)
 
OP
F
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Well, I think I'm going to get the loaded 2.3ghz Macbook Pro 15 with the matte HD screen.

I'm going to hold off on an SSD (none of are in stock anyway) until Lion comes out since I'll be wiping the drive and starting fresh from Lion anyway.

I'll stick with the 4GB ram until Lion as well and go 1600 8gb then.
 
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
295
Reaction score
5
Points
18
Location
BoCo
Your Mac's Specs
13inch 2.3 i5 MBP 64gb SSD 320gb HD 8gb 1333
Well, I think I'm going to get the loaded 2.3ghz Macbook Pro 15 with the matte HD screen.

I'm going to hold off on an SSD (none of are in stock anyway) until Lion comes out since I'll be wiping the drive and starting fresh from Lion anyway.

I'll stick with the 4GB ram until Lion as well and go 1600 8gb then.

Dont bother spending extra on 1600 ram. The macbook will underclock it to 1333.

Also I am guessing you meant 2.2ghz? The pros only come in 2.0 and 2.2 right now for the 15s
 
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
295
Reaction score
5
Points
18
Location
BoCo
Your Mac's Specs
13inch 2.3 i5 MBP 64gb SSD 320gb HD 8gb 1333
You must have the 2.0. It's supported in the higher end 2.2/2.3 CPUs.

Never mind then, sorry about that. I didn't realize MacBooks were finally allowing that.
 
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Your Mac's Specs
15" Macbook Pro i7, 500Gb / 32Gb iPhone 4 / 16Gb Ipod Touch, 4th Gen / 30Gb Ipod Video
Dont bother spending extra on 1600 ram. The macbook will underclock it to 1333.

Also I am guessing you meant 2.2ghz? The pros only come in 2.0 and 2.2 right now for the 15s

incorrect. There is also a 2.3GHz processor available in the 15" model. Don't know where you're getting your info from
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
368
Reaction score
14
Points
18
Location
Portland, OR
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook Pro|15" Hi-Res Anti-Glare|2.2 GHz quad i7|4GB RAM
Why not save the money and settle for the 2.2GHz processor? You will likely notice absolutely no speed decrease, and the money saved on the processor upgrade will allow you to purchase an SSD, so you can have a 2.2GHz computer with the SSD which will be faster than the 2.3GHz.
 
OP
F
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Got a loaded 15" 2.3ghz Macbook Pro today with the High Resolution Anti-glare screen.

As I expected, the system with the 5400RPM disk is not as responsive overall as my Macbook Air. Once an application is loaded, it's faster (such as web page rendering).

What I wasn't expecting however was the screen.. not as great looking as the 13" Macbook Air. The Air has worse Delta E (color accuracy) but is much more vivid, whiter and darker (better contrast), making it is stunning display while the Pro is almost disappointing.

What I loved was that Time Machine was able to turn my Macbook Air (which I'm in the process of selling) backup and put it straight onto the new Macbook Pro as if nothing changed at all. It has just about every setting, file and configuration that my Air has now, all without fuss. I did have to reconfigure some system settings and iTunes authorizations, but I'm loving this new feature (won't be using it when I get Lion and an SSD but very useful otherwise).
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top