Make Safari be Chrome?

Joined
Mar 5, 2011
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Points
3
Your Mac's Specs
Macbook 4,1; Snow Leopard
I'm SUCH a big fan of the Chrome browser, but lately YouTube has been really shaky in it, but runs fine in Safari. Also, Safari's Reader option is the best invention ever, so I'm considering coming home to Safari.

PROBLEM IS: I love Chrome because the search and URL bar are the SAME THING. How incredibly convenient is that? Is there any way I can melt Safari's search and URL bars into the same ultra-powerful browsing dream-come-true?

Thanks in advance,
Brandon
 
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
9,962
Reaction score
1,235
Points
113
Location
The Republic of Neptune
Your Mac's Specs
2019 iMac 27"; 2020 M1 MacBook Air; macOS up-to-date... always.
Convenient? Not in the least. It's not a complicated thing to put your cursor in the search field when you want to search, and put it in the url field when you want to type an address. Furthermore, doing it the Safari way lets you get to a website more quickly. If I want to go to, say... http://www.macupdate.com, then all I have to do is type macupdate and hit enter. Safari assumes this is for a .com address and adds the rest of the address in for me. In Chrome, I assume I'd get a Google search results page instead. Sounds a lot clumsier to me.

But to answer your question… no, there is no method that I can find.
 

iWhat

,
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
5,736
Reaction score
164
Points
63
Location
Toledo, Ohio
Your Mac's Specs
Macbook, iMac G5, iPad, iPhone 4, iPod (MANY)!
I'm in the same position as you with the YouTube issue. Chrome has been handling YouTube incredibly slow on my very dated Macbook. I only noticed the slow down of YouTube on Chrome, since the last update a week ago. However, Safari handles YouTube perfect as ever.

I do like having the address bar as a search bar too, but I've not gotten around to changing that function.

Here's a thread that might interest you: http://www.mac-forums.com/forums/os-x-applications-games/113536-use-safari-url-bar-search-bar.html
 

vansmith

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
19,924
Reaction score
559
Points
113
Location
Queensland
Your Mac's Specs
Mini (2014, 2018, 2020), MBA (2020), iPad Pro (2018), iPhone 13 Pro Max, Watch (S6)
Furthermore, doing it the Safari way lets you get to a website more quickly. If I want to go to, say... MacUpdate: Download Apple Mac Software & iPhone Software, then all I have to do is type macupdate and hit enter. Safari assumes this is for a .com address and adds the rest of the address in for me. In Chrome, I assume I'd get a Google search results page instead. Sounds a lot clumsier to me.
Not if you visit sites that don't end in .com. If I try to go to my school site for instance, which is a .ca ccTLD, typing the url without the ccTLD gets me a page that is apparently for sale. In Chrome, it at least gives me a search page where I can easily click on the actual page. I guess it depends on what you want to define as "clumsy."

There is SafariSIA which appears to get you closer to search in the address bar but it hasn't been updated in just over four years so it may not work with Safari 5. If that doesn't work (wouldn't count on it), you can always just push the tab button to tab over to the search field from the address bar.
 
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
123
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Location
Manila, Philippines
Your Mac's Specs
2011 13" MBP 2.3 Ghz Intel Core i5 4GB RAM
searching via the URL bar is one of the best feature chrome has.

it's not much big of a problem moving your cursor alittle more to click on the search bar right?

anyway, if you're having problems with chrome why dont you switch to mozilla?
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
296
Reaction score
5
Points
18
Correct me if I'm wrong but Opera has the equivalent of the Chrome omnibar and might run YouTube videos more smoothly.
 
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
9,962
Reaction score
1,235
Points
113
Location
The Republic of Neptune
Your Mac's Specs
2019 iMac 27"; 2020 M1 MacBook Air; macOS up-to-date... always.
Not if you visit sites that don't end in .com. If I try to go to my school site for instance, which is a .ca ccTLD, typing the url without the ccTLD gets me a page that is apparently for sale. In Chrome, it at least gives me a search page where I can easily click on the actual page. I guess it depends on what you want to define as "clumsy."

Well like I said… Safari "assumes" .com (though I do wonder if that can be changed via some hidden preference). At any rate, typing the search in the search box in Safari gives me a search page just as easily as typing a search in the url box in Chrome. I quite frankly don't get why this is considered so much harder. Both boxes are on the same bar. You can even resize them if it's so difficult to slide the mouse over a little bit.
 

iWhat

,
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
5,736
Reaction score
164
Points
63
Location
Toledo, Ohio
Your Mac's Specs
Macbook, iMac G5, iPad, iPhone 4, iPod (MANY)!
Well, it's easier and faster to press Command L than using the mouse and placing the cursor in the search field.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2004
Messages
4,744
Reaction score
381
Points
83
Location
USA
Your Mac's Specs
12" Apple PowerBook G4 (1.5GHz)
Well, it's easier and faster to press Command L than using the mouse and placing the cursor in the search field.
If you want the search field, that's option-command-F.

[size=-2](Which, according to the Standard Semantic Rules For Keyboard Shortcuts, is "Find-All." It makes sense.)[/size]
 
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
9,962
Reaction score
1,235
Points
113
Location
The Republic of Neptune
Your Mac's Specs
2019 iMac 27"; 2020 M1 MacBook Air; macOS up-to-date... always.
Well, it's easier and faster to press Command L than using the mouse and placing the cursor in the search field.

Hah! I was wondering about what that could be as I was driving to work.

One other issue I see with having everything lumped into one bar is the history. I type in the search field, I get search-related history for easy re-selection. In the URL bar, previously visited pages. Lumping all this together would be very annoying.

Anywho... to each their own. Hope the tips provided by all work out.
 

iWhat

,
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
5,736
Reaction score
164
Points
63
Location
Toledo, Ohio
Your Mac's Specs
Macbook, iMac G5, iPad, iPhone 4, iPod (MANY)!
If you want the search field, that's option-command-F.

[size=-2](Which, according to the Standard Semantic Rules For Keyboard Shortcuts, is "Find-All." It makes sense.)[/size]
But that's a third button to press! ;D

Anywho... to each their own. Hope the tips provided by all work out.

Yep, can't argue against what works for another.
 

vansmith

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
19,924
Reaction score
559
Points
113
Location
Queensland
Your Mac's Specs
Mini (2014, 2018, 2020), MBA (2020), iPad Pro (2018), iPhone 13 Pro Max, Watch (S6)
One other issue I see with having everything lumped into one bar is the history. I type in the search field, I get search-related history for easy re-selection. In the URL bar, previously visited pages. Lumping all this together would be very annoying.
It's not as bad as you might think. Search queries and URLs are differentiated by colour (URLs are green, search queries are black). But, like you said, to each their own.
 
OP
B
Joined
Mar 5, 2011
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Points
3
Your Mac's Specs
Macbook 4,1; Snow Leopard
Wow, actually Virgeist had the answer. Opera is a completely superior browser. i can watch YouTube in SMOOTH 1080p in Opera, which I haven't been able to do since I've had this computer. I love Apple to death, but Safari and Mail have HUGE flaws.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top