- Joined
- Apr 1, 2010
- Messages
- 102
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
- Your Mac's Specs
- MacBook Pro on OS X Mavericks
I have heard bad things about Parallels, particularly that it is really slow, but it's been a while ago. I see that Parallels Desktop has a new version out that's saying it runs 40% faster than the previous version. I have never used it.
I have used VMware Fusion before, but ever since upgrading from Leopard to Snow Leopard, I haven't gotten my hands on a copy of VMware Fusion that is compatible for Snow Leopard. However, now that I'm reading up on Parallels and how its website is saying it is faster than VMware Fusion and more people prefer it, I don't know what to think.
Has anyone tried both of them who can tell me which one is faster and/or better? Thanks!
I have used VMware Fusion before, but ever since upgrading from Leopard to Snow Leopard, I haven't gotten my hands on a copy of VMware Fusion that is compatible for Snow Leopard. However, now that I'm reading up on Parallels and how its website is saying it is faster than VMware Fusion and more people prefer it, I don't know what to think.
Has anyone tried both of them who can tell me which one is faster and/or better? Thanks!