Have to totally agree with your assessment, and doubt we're the only ones who are in the same boat. If 2 gigs = almost 14 hours worth of streamed data, which is 7 full length feature films or 14 hour long shows or 21 half hour tv shows, then I don't really see any benefit for the user if they're traveling a lot, especially in places where wi fi isn't an option.
I don't get it, I mean... isn't the whole point of the iPad for it to be the ultimate portable device ? Everyone has agreed that it's not a laptop/notebook replacement. We've also agreed that it can serve up content like an iPod, but better because of its screen size. The size of its screen also lends to new ideas for apps, but more so for when you're on the road.
After all, are you really sitting in your house streaming Netflix or Hulu on an iPad when you've got an laptop which can hook up to your TV? Sure, sure... you can hook the iPad up to a tv as well right? But then what's the point of the iPad after you've done that? People's main points of contention with the iPad in the home is that it's more convenient to sit with, vs an laptop, so you're actually more apt to hook your laptop up to the tv for streaming via wifi, over the iPad...riiight?
So again my question is, what's the point of 3g if the data is limited? Not everybody is able to just squeak by using such limitations. A lot of people might fill that criteria, and a lot of other people are now simply going to deal with it because they've already signed up and have no choice.
I'm just stuck struggling with the notion of watching every bit of what I do so that I don't get more of my money yanked from me, by a bunch of gipsy thieves. And the real kick in the face followed by a dousing of lemon juice on the open cut, is the whole tethering bit. I mean... are they for real? I can hardly believe that it's legal for such a thing to take place.
You're already capped at 2 gigs with a set price in a contract. But now you've got a separate data usage terminal, and they charge you more for it, all while using the same data in the previous plan???????!
I've never liked lawyers or the concept of suing anybody, but this goes beyond frivolous and IMO should be dealt with by means of civil and public jurisdiction.
And quite frankly, I'm a bit surprised that Apple would agree to have these terms be in place. Very disappointing.
Doug