• This forum is for posting news stories or links from rumor sites. When you start a thread, please include a link to the site you're referencing.

    THIS IS NOT A FORUM TO ASK "WHAT IF?" TYPE QUESTIONS.

    THIS IS NOT A FORUM FOR ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW TO USE YOUR MAC OR SOFTWARE.

    This is a NEWS and RUMORS forum as the name implies. If your thread is neither of those things, then please find the appropriate forum to ask your question.

    If you don't have a link to a news story, do not post the thread here.

    If you don't follow these rules, then your post may be deleted.

just found this

  • Thread starter xthisisRomancex
  • Start date
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Messages
2,789
Reaction score
84
Points
48
Location
A religiously oppressed state
Your Mac's Specs
17" MacBook Pro
would you care to post the whole thing i REALLY dont feel like / want to sign up just so i can see the reslut
 
OP
X

xthisisRomancex

Guest
Article:
Getting to the Source of Mac OS X
Subject: OS X on Intel
Date: 2001-12-26 00:32:11
From: ablair

It seems that anywhere Apple's plans are mulled over, or OS X's open source roots are introduced, there is an immense & bottomless interest in MacOS X on Intel hardware. One can only hope that this interest would trnaslate into a tidal wave of OS purchses if ever Apple Computer released an x86 version of OS X, because they would be destroying 80% of their revenue base in the same fell swoop. Apple is *hardware company* and they get most of their revenue from selling computers, not operating systems.

However, an Intel-version of OS X exists, even if in rudimentary form. MacOS X (the "Yellow Box" environment while the OS was under development) and Classic (the Blue Box environment in OS X) are both well known by now, but development was thought to be halted internally on Red Box (MacOS X on Intel version) shortly before it was completed. This is the reason the MacOS is still around at all (and not an unfortunate anectdote like OS/2): because Apple has wisely decided *not* to release such a version and deep-6ing their hardware market.


That being said, if certain conditions in the industry are right they could quickly release OS X on Intel, but only if they are sure of being able to play on an even field in the OS market on Intel hardware. The principal condition is undoubtedly if Microsoft is restricted from maintaining an unfair competitive advantage by tying Office, IE or other MS products to the Windows OS, probably ensured via breakup as ruled by Judge Jackson. Since this is now unlikely to happen any time soon, don't expect Apple to suicide themselves by competing with a company that holds all the strings. As evidence of this danger, you don't see any other significant market-share competitors around to the MS hegemony, do you? There used to be.


For now, we will have to be satisfied with Apple's open-source Darwin core on Intel hardware. Notably it does not have Aqua, but it is gaining steam as a streaming server platform for Quicktime content, amongst other things. And happily, improving quickly.
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
100
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Yeha like they have said before, Apple actually has a current version of OS X ported to the x86. Its actually easy for them to do, they just had to recompile it, i think the prospect of me getting to have both worlds on one pc is awesome
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top