• The Mac-Forums Community Guidelines (linked at the top of every forum) are very clear, we respect US law and court precedence when it comes to legality of activity.

    Therefore to clarify:
    • You may not discuss breaking DVD or BluRay encryption, copying, or "ripping" commercial, copy-protected DVDs.
    • This includes DVDs or BluRays you own. Even if you own the DVD or BluRay, it is still technically illegal under the DMCA to break the encryption. While some may argue otherwise, until the law is rewritten or the US Supreme Court strikes it down, we will adhere to the current intent of the law.
    • You may discuss ripping or copying unprotected movies or homemade DVDs.
    • You may discuss ripping or copying tools in the context that they are used for legal purposes as outlined in this post.

PC user just got Macbook for Video Editing?

Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Florida
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook Pro 15" 2.66ghz
I've been a long time PC user (still am), but I keep hearing from alot of folks that the Mac is the way to go for Photo and Video editing...

I'm a Windows Adobe Premiere user, and love it... but I wanted to see what the other side is like...

I have a new MacBook Pro 15", 2.66ghz and I have Final Cut Pro. I've been trying to learn it; but I find that there is nothing special about video editing on the Mac - I don't see the advantages of a MacBook over a PC at this point....

Am I missing something?

Please enlighten me... I want to drink the koolaid!

-Joe
 

dtravis7


Retired Staff
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
30,133
Reaction score
703
Points
113
Location
Modesto, Ca.
Your Mac's Specs
MacMini M-1 MacOS Monterey, iMac 2010 27"Quad I7 , MBPLate2011, iPad Pro10.5", iPhoneSE
No Cool Aid here at Mac Forums. You should have stuck with the Windows machine and Adobe Premier that you obviously prefer and not wasted your $$$ and Time.

Also what was this special video editing magic you were expecting to find on Final Cut? It's an excellent application but not magic.
 
C

chas_m

Guest
Am I missing something?

Please enlighten me... I want to drink the koolaid!

-Joe

Yes, you're missing something ... you're missing how well the OS and machine work.

Video editing software, particularly on the pro level, is all pretty similar. I happen to like FCS ahead of Adobe Premiere, but that's not to say AP sucks (besides, it's available for Mac as well anyway). But all of the video editing systems BASICALLY work alike.

What's different is the hardware and the OS.

If you can't see the obvious difference (and, imo, clear superiority) of OS X and the MacBook Pro, then I agree ... you wasted time and money.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2009
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
71
Points
48
Your Mac's Specs
Late 2013 rMBP, i7, 750m gpu, OSX versions 10.9.3, 10.10
Everyone is different - like dtravis said, you probably should have stuck with a windows machine and at most rented a Mac with the appropriate software to see what it was like.

Personally, I like editing in FCP and using Motion, DVDStudio Pro and Compressor to do my video editing a lot more then I enjoyed using Adobe Premiere, AE, Encore, etc. - but that is me - When I started using FC it just felt more "natural" to me if that made any sense compared to when I used Premiere (and so you know - I have used Windows based machines for years to edit video, including using FAST Video Machine, FAST VM NLE version, Razor, several different versions of Premiere, Pinnacle Liquid Edition Pro 6, so it's not like I used Mac/FCP and then tried all of these other packages - I went from those packages to Mac, and only made the switch to Mac in early '09 after I borrowed gear).

My personal vote is - if FCP isn't for you, and you don't like OSX, sell the Mac and get a killer windows based system and get Premiere for it. If you love OSX, but don't like FCP, look into Premiere for Mac. If you just can't stand OSX (it's not for everyone), but kind of like FCP - that's really not enough to stick with Mac, sell it and get what you feel most comfortable - and ultimately - most productive with.

JMHO
 
OP
J
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Florida
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook Pro 15" 2.66ghz
Thanks...

First off, I do not regret the purchase of my MacBook Pro... I am enjoying using it, and working with the OS.X.. and I have Windows 7 running with Parallel, and its quite sweet!

My point here is, I have always heard Mac users sing high praises about how you need to have a Mac to do video editing and photo editing... About how a PC just won't cut it... how better the Mac is... etc etc..

So, I bought one. I love it. I also love my PC and Windows 7.. I'm learning Final Cut Pro, and I do enjoy using it also... as well as Adobe Premiere. Each does certain things well.

BUT - I honestly do not see ANY difference between working with the Mac vs. the PC. As for the OS, there are pro's and con's - but both Windows 7 and Mac OS.X are similar and I can not say one is better or worse than the other... I love the style of the Mac, the design of the system - how Apple thought about pretty much everything... but I am also lacking certain things, like a "HOME" and "END" key on the keyboard...

So, I thought I'd ask the experts - what am I missing? I'm not going to sell my Mac, cause I really do like it... and I'm actually moving all my PC based stuff to this as my main computer... (I like running my Visual Studio development system on the Mac using a Windows 7 virtual machine)..
 

cwa107


Retired Staff
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
27,042
Reaction score
812
Points
113
Location
Lake Mary, Florida
Your Mac's Specs
14" MacBook Pro M1 Pro, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD
Home is Fn + left cursor. End is Fn + right cursor. Also, Page Up/Down is Fn + cursor Up/Down.

As far as what you're missing? I'm not going to trot out the standard lines about no-malware, reliability, lack of maintenance and complexity - but surely you've had to notice the 15 second boot times, instant sleep/wake (that is truly functional) and the simple matter of not having to reboot the machine constantly?
 
OP
J
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Florida
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook Pro 15" 2.66ghz
Thanks for those keyboard short-cuts, they are a life saver!!

Yes, I do notice and appreciate the quick start-up times! I have though had to force quit a few applications, such as the new Apple Aperture 3 trial version - it froze on me, or was taking up so much CPU I couldn't do anything... and eventually had to reboot...

I do not have any Antivirus for the MacBook... it is a nice thing; though I'm always skeptical that one day someone will come out with a slew of viruses for Mac's. And on the PC side, never really rebooted it that often... perhaps once every few days, nothing too excessive in my opinion.

Anyhow, all said and done; I enjoy this new MacBook Pro. Its sweet, fluid, functional, and nice... all in one small aluminum box. Way more stylish than my old Dell XPS laptop. :)

-Joe
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2009
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
71
Points
48
Your Mac's Specs
Late 2013 rMBP, i7, 750m gpu, OSX versions 10.9.3, 10.10
Another side note to consider - if you prefer premiere over Final Cut, if there is a Mac version of the Premiere version you have a license to, Adobe allows a platform switch (I think it's one time) to migrate from pc to mac or mac to pc - couldn't hurt to look into if you'd prefer to use Premiere :D
 
OP
J
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Florida
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook Pro 15" 2.66ghz
Hmm... good point about Adobe Premiere... I think I'll stick with Final Cut Pro on my Mac, as I still use Premiere on the PC for my workflow... once I get familiar with FCP, I may make a switch entirely...

A couple points I've seen with FCP that is a bit annoying when coming from Adobe Premiere, is the rendering of segments of the sequence when overlaying titles, or effects... Adobe Premiere doesn't do that. Also, I shoot with a AVCHD HD video camera, FCP requires me to Import and Log the files; where as Premiere works with them natively.

-Joe
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
126
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Location
Illinois
Your Mac's Specs
21.5" iMac, 3.06GHz duo, 4GB RAM, 500GB Hard Drive, NVIDIA 9400M| 8GB iPod Touch
I started with sony vegas on a PC, then moved to mac and final cut. I've found not only that I like Final Cut more, but also having it combined with mac os x is amazing! Even the small tools like expose and spaces help a lot when editing. It also seems to me that Final cut is very popular throughout the cinematography industry. And finally, no applications crashing and interrupting the workflow!:D
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Points
1
If you are editing AVCHD, stick with Windows. I just had to buy a Windows laptop because I was so fed up with how insanely idiotic Apple was regarding imovie and AVCHD. First you have to convert the MTS files to MOV using imovie to do anything with it. That alone takes about 3 minutes for every minute of video. Then you have to edit and render it back out to MOV which takes another 4-5 minutes per minute of video, its ridiculous. That was importing at imovie's optimized 960x540 setting too, not even importing at full HD!

Windows can work with the MTS files right off the cam and rendering to WMV is a breeze. A 1280x720 HD file only takes a tiny bit longer than real time and full 1920x1080 only takes about 2 minutes per minute of video the file sizes are way smaller than MOVs. Having said that, my Windows laptop is running an i3 processor with 4GB of RAM as opposed to my imac with a core 2 duo and 2GB, but still. I love my Mac, but working with AVCHD files are just awful with it.
 

dtravis7


Retired Staff
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
30,133
Reaction score
703
Points
113
Location
Modesto, Ca.
Your Mac's Specs
MacMini M-1 MacOS Monterey, iMac 2010 27"Quad I7 , MBPLate2011, iPad Pro10.5", iPhoneSE
Why not just install Windows on the Intel Mac Via BootCamp and run it native on the same machine? Then you could have had both without another machine.
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Why not just install Windows on the Intel Mac Via BootCamp and run it native on the same machine? Then you could have had both without another machine.

Well I needed a laptop for travel anyways and needed something with a nice processor to run Photoshop and edit HD video. I really wish Apple could find a way to make working with AVCHD easier, they do most everything else so well.
 
C

chas_m

Guest
I really wish Apple could find a way to make working with AVCHD easier, they do most everything else so well.

AVCHD is a format that is *specifically designed* not to be an "editing" format. This applies *equally* to Macs and PCs. They *both* have to be converted into an editable format.

That you know how to do this on a PC and (apparently) not on a Mac has no bearing on "how well" Macs works with AVCHD content.
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Points
1
AVCHD is a format that is *specifically designed* not to be an "editing" format. This applies *equally* to Macs and PCs. They *both* have to be converted into an editable format.

That you know how to do this on a PC and (apparently) not on a Mac has no bearing on "how well" Macs works with AVCHD content.

Ok, would you mind telling me how to do this on my Mac without having to convert the files to MOV before they can be edited? On my laptop, I can take the MTS files directly from the camera, drop them into WMM and begin editing, no need to convert anything.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
112
Points
63
Location
On the road
Your Mac's Specs
2011 MBP, i7, 16GB RAM, MBP 2.16Ghz Core Duo, 2GB ram, Dual 867Mhz MDD, 1.75GB ram, ATI 9800 Pro vid
My understanding is that AVCHD requires a lot of horse power to decode and display. Power that is better spent on real time feedback of effects, transitions, audio mixes, etc.

When editing thos MTS files, does WMM display in real time with little to no delay of effects, transitions, and multiple audio channels?
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Points
1
My understanding is that AVCHD requires a lot of horse power to decode and display. Power that is better spent on real time feedback of effects, transitions, audio mixes, etc.

When editing thos MTS files, does WMM display in real time with little to no delay of effects, transitions, and multiple audio channels?

Yep, everything runs flawless in WMM. I am not doing anything super intense though. Just some trimming, transitions and text but it doesnt even slow down a bit. But like I said, this laptop is no slouch. Its running an i3 processor with 4GB of RAM and a dedicated graphics card. So its not really fair to compare it to my core 2 duo imac with 2GB of RAM. However, even if I had a Mac Pro, it still wouldnt change the fact I cant work with MTS files straight off the camera. Dont know if its true, but I am told Adobe Premier is the only way you can edit MTS natively on a Mac. Even FCE and FCP have to convert them to either AIC or ProRes files which is time consuming and an extra step.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top