Do hard drives run slow after time

M

mr..nemo

Guest
every windows pc ive ever had only lasts me about 2years, the only conclusion i can find is that its because i ram the hard drive with so much stuff, it this true? and can i prevent this with a mac by buying a bigger hard drive therfor putting less stress onto it?
 
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
3,378
Reaction score
61
Points
48
Simply having files on your hard drive won't make your system run slower. The percentage the hard drive is full doesn't affect performance. The problem really is that when you installed apps on a PC, they almost all want to have install a little program that runs in the background, so as you install more programs you keep having more and more things running in the background which really slow you down. OS X disk management is a bit better than Windows in that you won't have to defragment ever.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2004
Messages
442
Reaction score
15
Points
18
Location
Sweden
Your Mac's Specs
2GHz C2D macbook
thats true, but if you are still worried about the disk performance there are meny disk otimizers from alsoft. (in any case, OS X will optimize your disk after every install)
 
OP
E

Ex_PC_Puke

Guest
biggest issue is that the appa and data become fragmented -- need to defrag every few months or so
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
350
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Location
Albany, NY
How much data you have on a drive does have an effect on performance. Assuming you have your drive defragmented, If you only have 10% of your drive full, the read/write head does not have to move very far to fetch all your data. If your disk is full, the head must swipe across the entire disk to try to find the data. The less movement, the lower the average seek times, and the quieter the HD will run.
 
OP
O

ocie

Guest
hard drive performance degrades as you fill it up. the affects become more pronounced at aroun 10% free, 90% used.
 
OP
M

mr..nemo

Guest
Avid6eek said:
How much data you have on a drive does have an effect on performance. Assuming you have your drive defragmented, If you only have 10% of your drive full, the read/write head does not have to move very far to fetch all your data. If your disk is full, the head must swipe across the entire disk to try to find the data. The less movement, the lower the average seek times, and the quieter the HD will run.


So in theory if i have 2 hard drives, 160bg and 250gb both are full about 30% the 250gb will run faster.... and if i had a 400bg that will run even faster
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
350
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Location
Albany, NY
Yes, if they were the same drives from the same product line. There are other things that make performance differences as well such as spindle speed, catch, NCQ, and interface (SATA vs SATAII).
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Messages
105
Reaction score
2
Points
18
if hard drives got slower with the more stuff you put on them then they wouldnt make such big hard drives! The problem with pc's is the start-up items that accumulate over the years and their general unreliability means files are damaged over the years making them even more unreliable.

Macs are much better at managing hard drives, they use a better filesystem and have a better operating system. Disk defrags are constant and startup items are few, meaning the macs dont have the same problems as pc's
 
OP
T

Thud

Guest
The problem is that all those bits are heavy. Put enough megabytes on a hard drive, and the drive has to spin slower because of the extra weight. Too much data means that some bits will be flung off the drive platters, corrupting data. This is why drives are enclosed in those metal cases-- to prevent potential injury from flying bits. The 0's don't hurt as bad but the 1's are like little splinters.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
350
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Location
Albany, NY
Mr Sprout said:
if hard drives got slower with the more stuff you put on them then they wouldnt make such big hard drives!
A full 400GB HD would run at the same speed as a full 200GB as the read/write head must sweep the whole drive of both systems. As a HD fills up, it's performance does fall.

Whether or not a feature such as constant disk management makes an OS better is an opinion. Those nice little features may be what causes OS X to be sluggish compared to WinXP....too many things going on in the background. I would much rather have control of what my system is doing, and how it does it. This of course is only my personal preference.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2004
Messages
1,112
Reaction score
53
Points
48
Location
Somewhere in the world
Your Mac's Specs
Powermac g4 400mhz, 10gb, 256mb ram, OS9
Hard Drives mainly get slow because of too much stuff on them. The less free space, the slower the performance. U should defrag the drive as well as check for spyware.

;)

http://spybot.com

( spyware removal tool that works well)
 
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
135
Reaction score
1
Points
18
Location
Leamington Spa
Your Mac's Specs
13.3 MacBook Air 1.7 i5 - also, Mac Mini and dead 12in iBook G4 (RIP)
Thud said:
The problem is that all those bits are heavy. Put enough megabytes on a hard drive, and the drive has to spin slower because of the extra weight. Too much data means that some bits will be flung off the drive platters, corrupting data. This is why drives are enclosed in those metal cases-- to prevent potential injury from flying bits. The 0's don't hurt as bad but the 1's are like little splinters.

****... is that why my laptop rattles when shaked VERY vigorously?

I did notice the hard drive had packed up totally and, before fixing it with a hammer, thought that a **** good shake would work.

I'd better put my 250GB back-up drive in a steel box, just in case... :))
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top