I think this question gets asked weekly. Nothing has been done with the extra space, it's simply a different way of mathematically expressing the same number of bytes. The difference being that the first instance uses base10 to determine the number of bytes in a kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, terabyte, petabyte etc and the latter uses base2. So, let me show you what I mean. If you open up terminal and use df -h this will show your drives in base2 (which is the default method for all operating systems to calculate space). As such:
mikeMbp:~ mike$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/disk0s2 233Gi 154Gi 78Gi 67% /
and if you issue df -H this will show it in base10 (which is what marketing departments use):
mikeMbp:~ mike$ df -H
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/disk0s2 250G 166G 84G 67% /
There is plenty of information available on the net about this disparity, much complaining about how this is false advertising etc, when it's simply just a different expression of the same thing... for instance.. if I list the space by kilobyte it's still..
mikeMbp:~ mike$ df -k
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/disk0s2 243862672 161950284 81656388 67% /
or a two hundred forty-three million, eight hundred sixty-two thousand, six hundred and seventy-two kilobyte hard drive.. boy, that's a mouthful.