Number of cores vs processor speed vs RAM

Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
1
This summer I am going to start editing 24P HD format digital video on Final Cut Studio 2

I can buy a 3.06 w 8 MB RAM 2.66 GHz iMac or a 4 core Mac Pro 2.66 Ghz w 12 MB RAM or an 8 core Mac Pro 2.66 with 16 GB RAM (I plan to choose the ATI Radeon 4870 graphics card with 512 VRAM)

My goal is to choose the hardware configuration from above that will provide the highest performance for editing video in Final Cut Studio 2. I am lost.

Which variable is most important for video editing: Processor speed? Amount of RAM? or number of cores? How do I weight the performance gain provided by each variable?

If pay all that money for 8 cores will end up have cores sitting idle during editing?

Might the 3.06 Ghz iMAc edit nearly as fast as a 4 core or 8 core Mac Pro?

Could someone with expertise in designing Mac hardware give me some advice?

Thanks


Brent :)
 
Joined
Apr 20, 2006
Messages
2,255
Reaction score
47
Points
48
Your Mac's Specs
Al iMac 20" 2.4Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo
Final Cut appreciates the extra cores: Final Cut Studio 2 and 8-core Mac Pro

Gigahertz isn't a major issue - a few hundred megahertz here and there on the same processor class isn't noticeable most of the time.

8 Cores is very expensive though and the benefit probably isn't really worth the extra cash.

The iMac will be fine, but considering the fact you can't upgrade the GPU, which you might need to do in the future, I'd go for the 4 Core Pro to be honest.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
234
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Location
Alberta, Canada
Your Mac's Specs
Mac Pro 14gb ram 24" LED Cd & 23" Cd
i would say a real life example would be carrera 6. I can render, literally twice as fast on the mac pro with 4 cores vs. my new imac.
 
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Points
1
It's also important to remember that the iMac is basically a laptop with a desktop drive.

The CPU, ram bus etc are all pretty much mobile specs.

So, in the case of editing HD, the Mac Pro should prove a lot more powerful, plus you are likely to put a lot more ram in it.

FWIW, I see 2008 Mac Pro 2.8 8-way machines for $2250 or so. No iMac or Macbook Pro is going to be able to touch that performance.

Core utilization is on the software. Compressing tends to use multi cores well, other tasks like timeline editing and filters vary wildly. Some tasks may seem single threaded almost, ie like some Photoshop filters.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Norfolk
Your Mac's Specs
A Mac Mini, 2Ghz Core 2 Duo, upgraded to 2Gb RAM
So - nearly on topic which is good for me - if one bought the standard 2.66ghz single i7 mac pro, could that cpu be upgraded easily? I wondered whether to buy the 1 or 2 cpu mac pro.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top