- Joined
- May 7, 2008
- Messages
- 73
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
- Your Mac's Specs
- 15" MBP 2.4GHz, 4GB RAM, 7200RPM 200GB
I will be referring to this interesting read from Smashing Magazine (specifically, point 6, which is Fitts' law): http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/08/12/top-10-usability-highs-of-the-mac-os
This is not so much a question as an observation, and I would like to see people's perspectives on this.
To review, Fitts' law states that the time needed to acquire a target is proportional to the distance to travel and the width of the target (for 1d motion; there are variations for 2d motion, which are essentially the same). The example always stated is that Mac's menus are at the top of the screen at all times, which essentially makes their size infinite, thus requiring less time to acquire them (this is also true for the Dock, btw). While this is 100% true, I am boggled by some of the other choices Apple made, specifically the size of their buttons.
What's with Safari and the Finder's tiny back and forward buttons? Actually, all the the buttons are so tiny that I feel it's a chore to use them (slight exaggeration). Thankfully, multitouch to the rescue! I never use the back and forward buttons, and always do the 3-finger swipe, which is the best thing since sliced bread, in my opinion.
Also, the close window, minimize window, and "zoom" buttons are even smaller! Now those are really hard to click (again, according to Fitts' law), so I always use the keyboard shortcuts. However, I feel for the users who don't like to memorize the keyboard shortcuts.
I'd like to hear what you guys think, and also if you have any other "man that's annoying" "features" in OS X.
This is not so much a question as an observation, and I would like to see people's perspectives on this.
To review, Fitts' law states that the time needed to acquire a target is proportional to the distance to travel and the width of the target (for 1d motion; there are variations for 2d motion, which are essentially the same). The example always stated is that Mac's menus are at the top of the screen at all times, which essentially makes their size infinite, thus requiring less time to acquire them (this is also true for the Dock, btw). While this is 100% true, I am boggled by some of the other choices Apple made, specifically the size of their buttons.
What's with Safari and the Finder's tiny back and forward buttons? Actually, all the the buttons are so tiny that I feel it's a chore to use them (slight exaggeration). Thankfully, multitouch to the rescue! I never use the back and forward buttons, and always do the 3-finger swipe, which is the best thing since sliced bread, in my opinion.
Also, the close window, minimize window, and "zoom" buttons are even smaller! Now those are really hard to click (again, according to Fitts' law), so I always use the keyboard shortcuts. However, I feel for the users who don't like to memorize the keyboard shortcuts.
I'd like to hear what you guys think, and also if you have any other "man that's annoying" "features" in OS X.