USB 2 vs Firewire 400

Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
638
Reaction score
6
Points
18
Location
UK, London
Your Mac's Specs
13 inch Macbook Pro Retina, 2.7ghz, 128gb SSD
I heard that firewire is faster than USB 2, but when i saw the speeds, it was 400 MBPS for firewire vs 480 MBPS for USB 2

so is firewire faster than USB 2 or not?

What is better for transferring work and media (music, videos, photos) on an external HD?
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
4,773
Reaction score
166
Points
63
Location
Central New York
Your Mac's Specs
15in i7 MacBook Pro, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD, 500GB HD
Firewire is faster. Burst speeds, USB 2 is faster, but normal sustainable speeds, firewireis much faster.
 
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
6,999
Reaction score
187
Points
63
Location
Hamilton College
Your Mac's Specs
20" iMac C2D 2.16ghz, 13" MacBook 2.0ghz, 60gb iPod vid, 1gb nano
Firewire is better for just about all normal uses.

USB 2.0 works fine on iPods when syncing because it is usually just a few songs adding here and there.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Messages
358
Reaction score
6
Points
18
Location
Newfoundland, Canada
Your Mac's Specs
2.2Ghz i7 Late 2011 MBP: 16GB Ram 500GB Seagate XT HD
Those 480Mbps and 400Mbps (not MB, MB is mega bytes and Mb is mega bits) are theoretical top speeds. In reality USB2 only reaches those speeds in bursts like stretchR has said. Firewire reaches it's peak and can hold it for a sustained period of time.

Think of it as a porsche driving in a 30mph zone and pontiac sunfire driving in a 50mph zone. Which is the faster car? ;)
 
OP
shahvikram123
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
638
Reaction score
6
Points
18
Location
UK, London
Your Mac's Specs
13 inch Macbook Pro Retina, 2.7ghz, 128gb SSD
Those 480Mbps and 400Mbps (not MB, MB is mega bytes and Mb is mega bits) are theoretical top speeds. In reality USB2 only reaches those speeds in bursts like stretchR has said. Firewire reaches it's peak and can hold it for a sustained period of time.

Think of it as a porsche driving in a 30mph zone and pontiac sunfire driving in a 50mph zone. Which is the faster car? ;)

ohh ok thanks, know i understand...
 
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Messages
3,570
Reaction score
470
Points
83
Location
Colorado
Your Mac's Specs
Mac's
I just synced just over 50 GB of music to a new (NO firewire sync!!!!:() 80 GB ipod, and had to use USB 2.0... it was TERRIBLE!!!! It took over 4 hours. :(
 
OP
shahvikram123
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
638
Reaction score
6
Points
18
Location
UK, London
Your Mac's Specs
13 inch Macbook Pro Retina, 2.7ghz, 128gb SSD
I just synced just over 50 GB of music to a new (NO firewire sync!!!!:() 80 GB ipod, and had to use USB 2.0... it was TERRIBLE!!!! It took over 4 hours. :(

Wow, that is a long time, I don't think I'm going to be transferring that much data at once anyway...I need to transfer about 12gb - 16gb of data
 

bobtomay

,
Retired Staff
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
26,561
Reaction score
677
Points
113
Location
Texas, where else?
Your Mac's Specs
15" MBP '06 2.33 C2D 4GB 10.7; 13" MBA '14 1.8 i7 8GB 10.11; 21" iMac '13 2.9 i5 8GB 10.11; 6S
With computers, you almost never want to look at the ratings of devices. Most all of them are theoretical. Always need to look at testing, to see if they can actually perform at their rated speeds or not. And it is always best to look at multiple tests.

Just got a quad interface enclosure and the Seagate 750GB SATA drive. Have only begun some testing - hope to have more up by the end of this next weekend.

Here are some preliminary #s. Am not tracking transfer rates, but, what we all care about - how long is it going to take. Both of these are for transferring from the standard MBP 5400 RPM 120GB drive.

1) Keep all software downloads in a folder called downloads. Currently, have 98 files, mostly .dmg's, totaling 1.32GB
USB - 1 Min 26 sec
FW400 - 59 sec
FW800 - 50 sec

2) A 7.57 GB movie folder
USB - 8 min 9 sec
FW400 - 4 min 39 sec

Anyone care to see something specific, let me know, and will try. Have not purchased an eSATA card, so I will not be able to test that at this time.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2006
Messages
1,495
Reaction score
34
Points
48
Your Mac's Specs
MBP 2.4/2GB/200HD/256 8600gt
I just synced just over 50 GB of music to a new (NO firewire sync!!!!:() 80 GB ipod, and had to use USB 2.0... it was TERRIBLE!!!! It took over 4 hours. :(


something ive found... if itunes isnt selected (highlighted or active), meaning this is the program that you are currently selected on, it will go about 1 song every 3 seconds.

if i have itunes active/selective, it goes about 3 songs a second.

try it. its odd
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Messages
358
Reaction score
6
Points
18
Location
Newfoundland, Canada
Your Mac's Specs
2.2Ghz i7 Late 2011 MBP: 16GB Ram 500GB Seagate XT HD
Same thing happens with windows. The "highlighted" program is given priority with cpu cycles, ram,....etc...
 
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
502
Reaction score
13
Points
18
Your Mac's Specs
Mac pro quad 2.66 / G5 1.8
Those 480Mbps and 400Mbps (not MB, MB is mega bytes and Mb is mega bits) are theoretical top speeds. In reality USB2 only reaches those speeds in bursts like stretchR has said. Firewire reaches it's peak and can hold it for a sustained period of time.

Think of it as a porsche driving in a 30mph zone and pontiac sunfire driving in a 50mph zone. Which is the faster car? ;)

Depends how fast they're going :Smirk:
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2006
Messages
109
Reaction score
14
Points
18
Hmmm.... how about this for a comparison:

Think of a Porsche driving 45 mph and a bicyclist riding 50 mph. Which one will cover 500 miles more quickly? The Porsche (firewire) maintains a consistent speed for the entire transfer rather than measuring the speed of a short burst.

--
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top