Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Might buy a PC..
    sKaD's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 05, 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    492
    Specs:
    1.8GHz G5 512mb Ram
    Might buy a PC..
    I think I might be purchasing a PC :eek:

    So I will have my G5 and hopefully a:
    • Pentium 4 3.2GHz (800 FSB)
    • Biostar P4VMA-M (3 PCI - 8X AGP & Int. 3D Graphics - 6 Ch - 10/100 - SATA
    • & RAID - 8 USB 2.0)
    • 512MB - Atlas Precision Brand - PC3200 DDR - Memory
    • 40GB - 7200RPM - ATA 133 - Hard Drive
    • 16X DVD Drive
    • ATX 420w Mid-Tower w/Front USB
    • Microsoft Windows XP Home

    Price = $630 USD

    Video card will be the onboard until I can save up another $400 for a Radeon 9800 XT 256mb, Ram will be that until I can afford more, HDD will be that until I can afford bigger, maybe just another 40gigger.

    I guess it's main purpose will be for games & folding

  2. #2
    iSheep
    Guest
    That's a pretty good price. What monitor are you going to use?

  3. #3
    Might buy a PC..

    Member Since
    Apr 21, 2004
    Location
    San Francisco, California
    Posts
    173
    Specs:
    15" 2.2Ghz SR MBP
    Suggestion on the memory since being a hybrid user. GO WITH CRUCIAL! They Rule in memory.

  4. #4
    Might buy a PC..
    Absolute Zero's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 05, 2003
    Location
    I'm slowly sinking in the posts of Mac-forums
    Posts
    1,246
    Specs:
    PowerBook 12" Combo Drive/867 MHz/256 MB RAM/40 GB hard drive/Mac OS X 10.3.5/AirPort Extreme it sux
    OMAIGAWSH WHY WOULD YOU GO TO WINDOZ ITS WINBLOWS (LOL) NO DONT DO IT!

    Do it. And I know why you are going to do it. Because you want XBConnect.
    But if you wait, you can save a lot of money and try VPC 7.

  5. #5
    d4rr3n
    Guest
    My suggestions (assuming you have the choice):
    You dont need to do these things, it's already a good system. Just a few suggestions to max it out.
    Get a 2.4/2.6/2.8 C and overclock it, with proper cooling (and a tiny bit of luck with the 2.4) they should all be able to hit 3.2ghz. They will however be faster than the 3.2 because they have a higher FSB.
    Get faster ram since you would be overclocking the FSB and would want the ram to rise in speed to match it....pc4200 would be good
    2.4C are generally the best overclockers percentage wise since it has the lowest multiplier giving you more room to raise the fsb.
    Get a better motherboard, one without integrated video (believe me you'll be kicking yourself for it later)
    And lastly, whatever you do...DO NOT GET THE 9800XT especially for $400. The 9800pro is under $200 and is almost guaranteed to overclock to 9800xt specs. Besides, the nvidia 6800 non ultra is almost $100 less than the 9800XT and it wipes the floor with it.

  6. #6
    WilliS
    Guest
    dont overclock a processor, its not a smart thing to do to your system and dramatically reduces the life of your processor, not to mention voiding any warrentee on it... overclocking is for 14 year old kids who want to prove something to their friends, its pointless.

  7. #7
    nicholas
    Guest
    All I can say is that's a DAMN good price for all that hardware.

  8. #8
    d4rr3n
    Guest
    Please dont listen to this moron, he obviously knows nothing about overclocking and/or is just jealous because he can't do it on his g5. Overclocking a processor has absolutely no effect on the life of a processor (2.4/2.6/2.8C's are just underperforming 3.2C's.....they are all made from the same chips). OVERVOLTING does however shorten the life of a processor, you can still overclock without needing to raise the core cpu voltages. There are charts for how much a % of overvolt will reduce the life of your processor by. But honestly, do you really care if your CPU only lasts 7 years instead of 10 years? By then it will be worth about 10 bucks. Plain and simple, overclocking saves you money and gives you more performance for your money. If you find that pointless then you are just a moron plain and simple. Why for example spend $130 for an athlon xp3200+ when an xp2500+ is $70 and will reach xp3200+ speeds guaranteed? Why buy a 9800xt when 9800pros can overclock to the same speeds and performance for half the price? Why buy a 3.2ghz and keep it there if it can reach 4.0ghz or even higher? It seems pointless not to do it. Isn't that why we all buy top of the line computers to get top of the line performance?

  9. #9
    TylerMoney
    Guest
    It's always good to have something from both worlds. I know I always will; even though I've chosen my favorite of the worlds

  10. #10
    Might buy a PC..
    witeshark's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 09, 2004
    Location
    Miami FL
    Posts
    2,860
    Specs:
    G4 1Ghz OS X 10.4.7
    Everyone has an opinion, and sometimes both in a different opinion set may be right, but never to enable/justify name calling IMO. I think it's a great value and he knows what he's getting into running windows. But I think the pc prices are still on the way down

  11. #11
    Matt
    Guest
    I think when I do get a newish Mac, I will always have both PC and Mac, for things like gaming and programs that don't work/ aren't available for a Mac.

  12. #12
    Might buy a PC..
    sKaD's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 05, 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    492
    Specs:
    1.8GHz G5 512mb Ram
    Well, now I'm probably going to get something better than that PC, but the price of course will go up.

    Zero, I'm not getting the PC for XBConnect.
    I'm getting the PC for:
    Everquest 2
    Half Life 2
    Doom 3
    & some others.



  13. #13
    Might buy a PC..
    Absolute Zero's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 05, 2003
    Location
    I'm slowly sinking in the posts of Mac-forums
    Posts
    1,246
    Specs:
    PowerBook 12" Combo Drive/867 MHz/256 MB RAM/40 GB hard drive/Mac OS X 10.3.5/AirPort Extreme it sux
    Quote Originally Posted by sKaD
    Zero, I'm not getting the PC for XBConnect.
    I'm getting the PC for:
    Everquest 2
    Half Life 2
    Doom 3
    & some others.

    :)
    Liar. Your getting it for XBConnect as well. :p

  14. #14
    WilliS
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by d4rr3n
    Please dont listen to this moron, he obviously knows nothing about overclocking and/or is just jealous because he can't do it on his g5.
    you know nothing about me, nothing about my life, nothing about my history with computers, and nothing about money.

    let me put this in perspective for you. if someone buys a computer, tells you what they have, and tells you what they will be upgrading to, etc. why would you give them advice that has the chance of ruining a machine if it is not done correctly? first of all, do you know their computer ability? just because i read you off a spec sheet of my computer, and know how to upgrade ram/video cards, doesnt mean they want to be putting tubes of liquid into their machine and feel totally comfortable with advice from someone on a forum. something that is second nature to you, may be a foreign language to someone else. so why dont you let him do it his way, and build his computer how he wants it built. all the games he listed will run just fine on the system he will be running, so why take a chance at frying a processor or maybe more damage if cooling isnt correct. Ive burned out my fair share of t-bird 1.4's trying to do the graphite pencil trick, and yea, maybe overclocking is easier on certain chips, but cooling is still an issue. lets weigh the consequences quick: 1. you spend eh... for arguement sake, $150 on material to cool a processor and video card. and if it works, youve made your system around 10% better. 2. you spend $150 on the material, everything goes to hell, and your possibly out $650 for the machine... granted it probably only ruined a processor and video card (still a couple hundred dollars). OR you leave your machine alone, and have the security of knowing it does work, it has a warrantee if anything happens, and you are still able to run the games you want at very acceptable rates.

    its one thing to tell your side of things, its another to say im a moron because i suggested otherwise to your outlandish suggestion. before you make the hastey remark that i know nothing on the topic of overclocking, maybe you should think more about the user's wants and needs, and less about impressing people with your knowledge of overclocking.

    and yes, ruining a $650 machine for a 10% increase in speed IS pointless.

    by the way, your rhetorical questions at the end of your rant would have been more persuasive if you used punctuation when they are needed.

    "Why[comma] for example[comma] spend $130 for an athlon xp3200+ when an xp2500+ is $70 and will reach xp3200+ speeds guaranteed?"

    *edit*
    everquest 2 is gonna be great ... did you play EQ1? i played for 2 years on fennin ro... had a decent 65 mage and a 65 cleric

  15. #15
    Might buy a PC..
    hype.it's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 27, 2004
    Location
    China
    Posts
    738
    Specs:
    Dual 2.2GHz powered by AMD Opteron - *Sends G5 & 8Gb Ram to scrap heap* Yeah! finally switched BACK!
    Why do trolls patrol those forums? Argue about the negative, negative points of macs, where pc's have plenty? But PC users love their systems and would live with them, hoping that someone will solve the problems.

    I think when you talk about processor speeds, you should look at the amount of data it processes in a single cycle, one byte if you will. This is the true power! Forget about how many polygons and FPS's - this is game talk!

    Did you know, All macs are clockable? You'll need a soldering iron, tweezers and maybe a steady pair of hands. OK.. users haven't worked out how to OC a G5 but I bet someone out there is working on it. Sooner or later someone gonna work out the SMT settings for the G5's daughter board and relocated the SMT's that holds the secrets to G5 over-clocking, if you own one and you look at the traces on the back of the daughter board, you'll discover a group of 8 or 10 SMT resisters. Those are the mac equivalent of jumpers.

    A stock G5 with it's liquid cooling system, a single clock cycle would process more data then any pc I know, on average about one mac cycle to one point five pc cycles (using the same class of processor and equivalent clock speed). When Mac's were talking about Gigaflops, PC's was still worrying about the megahertz rules, but AMD changed that. Then Apple started making Dual CPU systems, Intel adds 'hyper-threading' that fools applications that there are more real CPU's, adding to the work load. P4's can't be duelled due to it's design, unless your talking about P4 Xeons.

    And memory capacity? Well Mac's have done it again! Addressing eight gigabytes while current PC's are stuck at four! Why? 32bit systems can only address four gigabytes. OK, server boards can address more but you can paying more than the price of a stock G5 for this luxury.

    "Even elephants would be hard-pressed to keep track of as much data as the PowerPC G5. With up to 8GB of main memory, the Power Mac G5 can hold a gigantic 3D model, a complex scientific simulation or a sequence of HD video entirely in RAM — drastically reducing the time to access, modify and render such data. That’s 40 times more data between RAM and the processor. Theoretically, the G5 could address up to 18 billion billion bytes of virtual memory. Or 18 exabytes for short. But in practice, the PowerPC G5 has 42 bits of address space for memory, which means it supports just 2 or 4 terabytes of system memory. You can’t put that much RAM in a desktop computer — yet — but it sets the stage for untold computational feats."

    For gamer and mac haters. Here's something to please and envy over...

    ANALYSIS OF CPU INTENSIVE TESTS
    Apple has made signficant strides with the G5 to catch up to the Windows PCs in performance. The Dual G5/2.0 was faster than any of the Windows PCs we tested in 4 out of 5 tests. It was a close second to the Dual Xeon/2.4 in that one test.

    When we tested the faster G4 Power Mac 4 months ago, it only was fastest in one test.

    Now before you PC fans send me flaming emails, we do plan to test a Dual 3GHz Xeon and 3.2GHz Pentium 4 in about a week. We do want to show the fastest PCs against the fastest Macs. This page is a moving target.

    TEST NOTES & KUDOS

    The Dual Athlon 2600+ (2.1GHz) system had 1GB of DDR memory and ran Windows XP.

    The Dual 2.4GHz Xeon system had 2GB of PC2100 DDR (cas 2) memory and ran Windows XP Professional. (Hyper-threading was enabled.)

    The 3.0 GHz Pentium 4 system had 2GB of 400MHz PC3200 DDR memory and ran Windows XP Professional. (Hyper-threading was enabled.)
    Many thanks to Peter Ashford of ACCS for letting us play with his Pentium 4 and Xeon systems. Show your support for Peter by visiting his web site to check out his company's products and services.

    Special thanks also, to John Moreland and the San Diego Supercomputer Center for putting me in touch with Peter and letting us use the Visualization Lab for some of our testing.

    HYPERTHREADING
    Both the Pentium and Xeon had hyper-threading turned on. It's an interesting and effective feature. When running Cinebench 2003 render, the application "thought" the Xeon had four processors. And the 3D render speeds with hyper-threading enabled were as much as 23% faster than when it was disabled.
    Though the G4 supports multi-threading, it does NOT support hyper-threading.

    The Apple Power Mac G5 models were borrowed for testing from anonymous sources. They were running Mac OS X (10.2.7). The Dual 2GHz G5 had 2GB of PC3200 DDR. The 1.6GHz G5 had 1.5GB of PC2700 DDR. The 1.8GHz G5 had 2GB of PC3200 DDR.
    Photoshop 7.01 had the new G5 upgrade.

    The Apple Power Mac 1.42GHz MP was purchased from Small Dog Electronics (SmallDog.com). It had 2GB of DDR 2700 memory and ran OS X (10.2.6).

    Big Mahalo to ATI Technology who provided the Radeon 9800 Pro graphics cards for all test systems.

    source: http://www.barefeats.com
    Full article:
    Power Mac G4 and G5 versus Pentium 4, Dual Xeon, and Dual Athlon
    QUAKE3, UT2003, AND CINEBENCH fly-through

    And....

    from d4rr3n

    My suggestions (assuming you have the choice):
    You dont need to do these things, it's already a good system. Just a few suggestions to max it out.
    Get a 2.4/2.6/2.8 C and overclock it, with proper cooling (and a tiny bit of luck with the 2.4) they should all be able to hit 3.2ghz. They will however be faster than the 3.2 because they have a higher FSB.
    Get faster ram since you would be overclocking the FSB and would want the ram to rise in speed to match it....pc4200 would be good
    2.4C are generally the best overclockers percentage wise since it has the lowest multiplier giving you more room to raise the fsb.
    Get a better motherboard, one without integrated video (believe me you'll be kicking yourself for it later)
    And lastly, whatever you do...DO NOT GET THE 9800XT especially for $400. The 9800pro is under $200 and is almost guaranteed to overclock to 9800xt specs. Besides, the nvidia 6800 non ultra is almost $100 less than the 9800XT and it wipes the floor with it.
    Alternative system, if your gonna build for speed and games and liquid assets ain't a problem!!

    • 2.8GHz LGA775 Pentium 4 (2.8GHz CPU running at 3.565GHz with 680MHz DDR2 memory bus)
    • Abit AA8 DuraMax i925X Skt 775 800FSB, DDRII 533, PCI Express, SATA RAID, 6ch Audio, GB LAN, USB2, F/Wire ATX @ £ 104.95
    • Corsair XMS2 Pro series DDR2 memory modules (CM2X512-5400C4PRO) x2 or (TWIN2X1024-5400C4PRO) for matched pair.
    • NVIDIA GeForce 6800Ultra, PCI-Express version.
    • Koolance Exos cooler or Custom built heat-sink with fans and a peltier tower.

    Noob's asks 'what's a peltier?'

    Personally.. both platforms are good... PC's for games and Mac for serious horse power when working with applications and in the business of making money without all the headaches.

    I get why you trolls patrol... but not everyone wants to do the same things as you on their machines, there's more to life than games, games and games. Some people have money, if this envy you then go get a JOB or start a career if your capable! Have a life and earn some real liquid assets. Buy a island, have someone design and build a house to your specs, have a few fast sporty cars and super-bikes, build the fastest, most stable PC system and upgrade till you hearts content!

    But i warrant this fact... You'll be installing windows a few times, lose data on occasions, suffer the odd crash or crashes, get various viruses, worms and install well hidden often unknown spyware applications that transmit your private info to marketing companies; that will spam you until you become corned beef. Don't expect the rest of us Mac users to waste valuable disk space installing virus killers so PC platform based binary bacteria won't hit your system or others like yours.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Noob help with MacBook pro - to buy or not to buy?
    By Big Dogg in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-13-2011, 08:01 PM
  2. If I buy Keynote on my Mac, do I have to buy it on the iPhone?
    By rsphotocreation in forum OS X - Apps and Games
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-10-2011, 11:47 AM
  3. Best Buy Forcing Customers To Buy Service Plan To Get An iPad 2?
    By OneMoreThing... in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-11-2011, 09:47 PM
  4. Mac Pro 8 core, to buy or not to buy help
    By JUSCUZIAM in forum Switcher Hangout
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 02-14-2008, 05:28 PM
  5. Help me fight the relapse! Intend to buy Mac, Tempted to buy PC!
    By electronsi00 in forum Switcher Hangout
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-29-2007, 04:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •