Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?
    iggibar's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 20, 2009
    Location
    C-Town
    Posts
    4,071
    Specs:
    Mac Pro 4.1 15" MBP. 13" MBP. 17" PB. Power Mac G5. Galaxy Note 4 160gb*
    Question What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?
    As the title says, what company created the first processor with more than 1 core that was available on a computer? I've been looking it up online, but can't find a solid answer. Anyone know on here? I keep getting answers between intel, IBM, and even AMD.
    “If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself but to your own estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.” Marcus Aurelius

  2. #2
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?
    Raz0rEdge's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 17, 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    8,188
    Specs:
    27" i7 iMac, 24" iMac, 13" Macbook Air, iPhone 5 & 5S, iPod Nano 7th Gen, iPad 2 16GB WiFi, iPad 3

  3. #3
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?
    XJ-linux's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 02, 2007
    Location
    Going Galt...
    Posts
    3,418
    Specs:
    MacBookAir5,2:10.9.5-MacMini3,1:10.9.5-iPhone6,1:8.3
    The good folks at IBM introduced the first true multi-core processor with their Power4 systems. These were based on PowerPC instructions.

    Raz0rEdge beat me too it.

    Note: the IBM Power7 blade system I'm building this morning has:
    4 Cores
    4 Virtual processors per core
    4 Logical processors per virtual processor
    Totalling 64 logical CPUs worth of processing functionality all running on AIX 6.1.6 with live partition mobility. Fun stuff!
    Never judge a man, untill you have walked a mile in his shoes...
    That way you'll be a mile away from him, and you'll have his shoes.

  4. #4
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?
    Chris H.'s Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 03, 2009
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by XJ-linux View Post



    Note: the IBM Power7 blade system I'm building this morning has:

    CPUs worth of processing functionality all running on AIX 6.1.6 with live partition mobility. Fun stuff!

    Huh? *Scratches head*
     iPad Air 2 - iOS 9 Beta
     iPhone 6 64GB - iOS 9 Beta
     Mac mini Server M10 - OS X 10.10.5
     MacBook Uni L09 - OS X 10.11 Beta

  5. #5
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?
    iggibar's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 20, 2009
    Location
    C-Town
    Posts
    4,071
    Specs:
    Mac Pro 4.1 15" MBP. 13" MBP. 17" PB. Power Mac G5. Galaxy Note 4 160gb*
    Thanks a bunch for the links. I was talking to a friend who mentioned that the powerpc was a processor on the power mac that was a breed of processors based off of one of the first multi-core systems that were used as servers/super computers. I didn't believe it, but I guess it's true. Nice thing to know. That's one more reason for me to like IBM and Apple
    “If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself but to your own estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.” Marcus Aurelius

  6. #6
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?

    Member Since
    Jan 27, 2007
    Location
    *Brisvegas*
    Posts
    5,658
    Specs:
    17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
    Quote Originally Posted by XJ-linux View Post
    The good folks at IBM introduced the first true multi-core processor with their Power4 systems. These were based on PowerPC instructions.

    Raz0rEdge beat me too it.

    Note: the IBM Power7 blade system I'm building this morning has:
    4 Cores
    4 Virtual processors per core
    4 Logical processors per virtual processor
    Totalling 64 logical CPUs worth of processing functionality all running on AIX 6.1.6 with live partition mobility. Fun stuff!
    What's the point of 64 processors when 58 of them sit idle?
    My point is can you utilise all of them? of it is just massive over kill "just case you can"?

  7. #7
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?

    Member Since
    Apr 09, 2009
    Location
    Ithaca NY
    Posts
    2,073
    Specs:
    13 inch alMacBook 2GHz C2D 4G DDR3, 1.25GHz G4 eMac
    If it's a server, yes, he is more likely to use them all, and not need a whole lot of speed per process, just the ability to run ridiculous numbers of simultaneously processes.

  8. #8
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?
    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,758
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Quote Originally Posted by idrinorbarsaku View Post
    Thanks a bunch for the links. I was talking to a friend who mentioned that the powerpc was a processor on the power mac that was a breed of processors based off of one of the first multi-core systems that were used as servers/super computers. I didn't believe it, but I guess it's true. Nice thing to know. That's one more reason for me to like IBM and Apple
    Hmmm... single core PPC was around long before the multicore variants. Also, it was a joint venture between Motorola and IBM -- although Apple was one of the earliest adopters, mostly because they relied upon Motorola's earlier CPU architecture. It essentially superseded the 68K line of 16/32-bit CPUs and was entirely RISC-based. In a perfect world, it would have also superseded x86, which it was vastly superior to upon release. Alas, the Wintel world prevailed and the PPC eventually faded mostly into the embedded market. But for a time in the mid-90's, it looked like PPC was the future - and it should have been. Even Microsoft produced variants of Windows NT that ran natively on PPC.
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  9. #9
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?

    Member Since
    Apr 09, 2009
    Location
    Ithaca NY
    Posts
    2,073
    Specs:
    13 inch alMacBook 2GHz C2D 4G DDR3, 1.25GHz G4 eMac
    Haven't GPUs been multicore for a looong time? Or were they multichip and some how voodooed together on the main board?

  10. #10
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?

    Member Since
    Apr 09, 2009
    Location
    Ithaca NY
    Posts
    2,073
    Specs:
    13 inch alMacBook 2GHz C2D 4G DDR3, 1.25GHz G4 eMac
    It was ARM, 1983. 1986 was the date the first real ARM cores hit the market though, with the ARM2

  11. #11
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?
    XJ-linux's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 02, 2007
    Location
    Going Galt...
    Posts
    3,418
    Specs:
    MacBookAir5,2:10.9.5-MacMini3,1:10.9.5-iPhone6,1:8.3
    Quote Originally Posted by the8thark View Post
    What's the point of 64 processors when 58 of them sit idle?
    My point is can you utilise all of them? of it is just massive over kill "just case you can"?
    The point is to put an entire SCM (Supply Chain Management) solution on a single box so hardware assets can be shared. We virtualize many different servers and run them concurrently on the same box. The system uses on average about 75% of the CPUs when I tune it correctly. It hits 90% at month end audit time. By having so many, certain components can dynamically borrow spare CPU cycles from other systems on the same box and run at 200%, 500%, 900% of their entitled capacity if needed. This one will have 4 SAP SC application servers, 2 IBM virtual I/O disk servers, 2 IBM virtual I/O network servers, a SAP central instance, and an Oracle 11g database server all virtualized and plugged into our Nexus core via an aggregated 40Gb/Sec ether-channeled connection.
    Then we will build another identical system for fail over purposes.
    Never judge a man, untill you have walked a mile in his shoes...
    That way you'll be a mile away from him, and you'll have his shoes.

  12. #12
    What company created the first processor with more than 1 core?
    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,758
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Quote Originally Posted by XJ-linux View Post
    The point is to put an entire SCM (Supply Chain Management) solution on a single box so hardware assets can be shared. We virtualize many different servers and run them concurrently on the same box. The system uses on average about 75% of the CPUs when I tune it correctly. It hits 90% at month end audit time. By having so many, certain components can dynamically borrow spare CPU cycles from other systems on the same box and run at 200%, 500%, 900% of their entitled capacity if needed. This one will have 4 SAP SC application servers, 2 IBM virtual I/O disk servers, 2 IBM virtual I/O network servers, a SAP central instance, and an Oracle 11g database server all virtualized and plugged into our Nexus core via an aggregated 40Gb/Sec ether-channeled connection.
    Then we will build another identical system for fail over purposes.
    In our case, we run Citrix servers with many cores because they host a full desktop environment for hundreds and sometimes thousands of employees. The servers are grouped together in a farm. Sometimes a single server will play host to 50+ users, connecting from thin client terminals or desktop PCs running a Citrix client. As you might imagine, add a few dozen power users onto a server and they can eat up those resources pretty quickly.

    Our newest iteration is virtualized, with lots of small virtual servers running on a few very large physical servers. In this way, we can scale up by adding virtual servers to the load, but that comes at a cost to the host server's cores.
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-12-2012, 04:38 AM
  2. Intel: 1000-core processor possible
    By the8thark in forum Schweb's Lounge
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-23-2010, 08:08 PM
  3. Macbook's next processor: Better 2 Core or Powerful 4-Core?
    By livinitup1 in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-27-2009, 07:32 PM
  4. Dual Core Processor
    By Woodsie in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-30-2007, 02:52 PM
  5. Intel Core Duo processor
    By hojkoff_101 in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-24-2006, 02:32 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •