Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Windows Vista or XP under Fusion or Parallels?

    Member Since
    Nov 02, 2007
    Posts
    72
    Specs:
    24'' iMac 2.8 GHz, 4 Gig RAM, 500 GB HD. 15.4'' MBP, 2.6 GHz, 4 Gig RAM, 200GB HD, iPhone 8GB.
    Windows Vista or XP under Fusion or Parallels?
    I have an OEM copy of Vista which I just bought from newegg.

    I also have an OEM copy of XP which came along with my Dell and my Fujitsu tablet 1 year ago.

    I really don't which to buy another copy of XP.

    Can someone kindly tell me which is the best combination?

    Vista running in fusion or parallels? Which has better support and which one is faster, more stable?

    XP running in fusion or parallels? Which has better support and which one is faster, more stable?

    I had already installed my Vista under Boot Camp but I have not connected it to the internet yet, therefore not activated yet. My question is if I get it activated under boot camp, will I be able to use it in Fusion or Parallels? It is the same computer, therefore same hardware, I really don't want to get into those activation trouble, anyone has any experience in this?

    I have a MacBook Pro 15.4 2.6GHz, 4GB RAM 200GB HD.

    I will be using windows mainly for Office, running some small files that are not able to run in leopard, occasionally playing games....not sure what game yet.

  2. #2
    Windows Vista or XP under Fusion or Parallels?
    louishen's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 22, 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8,968
    Specs:
    Mac Mini Core i7 2012 | White 2009 MacBook 2 Ghz | 733 Mhz G4 Quicksilver
    I believe that fusion or parallels can run off your existing bootcamp installation, but others may be able to help more

    Of course if you have 2 copies of Windows running, MS will say you need 2 copies of windows, so make sure you can run the bootcamp windows from the other programs.

    As for XP versus Vista - that's up to you, me personally would use XP for any windows stuff, but stick to OS X for all other tasks

  3. #3
    Windows Vista or XP under Fusion or Parallels?
    NolaWegs's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 02, 2006
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    146
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro 2.16 GHz CD 2GB RAM; iPhone
    Both OS's will be able to run off your existing bootcamp partition (at least through fusion as that is the only virtualization program i use). You shouldn't have any activation problems, although you may need to go through the procedure more than one, this is a hassle but VM claims that it is a necessary step.

    I agree with louishen, in using xp of vista it's just a better OS. also, if you're looking to use xp for office, I would strongly consider making the investment in macOffice. It'll make you're life loads easier. As far as the gaming goes, I would recommend fusion for that as it seems to work a bit better with games in general; however, for more advanced gaming it would be better to just run those through an xp boot rather than fusion. hope this helps.

  4. #4
    Windows Vista or XP under Fusion or Parallels?
    louishen's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 22, 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8,968
    Specs:
    Mac Mini Core i7 2012 | White 2009 MacBook 2 Ghz | 733 Mhz G4 Quicksilver
    if you only need to open and edit a few office docs, NeoOffice is more than capable

    its a port of open office and offers a fully compatible Office set of programs for OS X for no money

    www.neooffice.org

  5. #5
    Windows Vista or XP under Fusion or Parallels?

    Member Since
    Nov 02, 2007
    Posts
    72
    Specs:
    24'' iMac 2.8 GHz, 4 Gig RAM, 500 GB HD. 15.4'' MBP, 2.6 GHz, 4 Gig RAM, 200GB HD, iPhone 8GB.
    I just installed Vista under Fusion, the speed of vista is slow compared to boot camp. Is there anyway to make it faster?

  6. #6
    Windows Vista or XP under Fusion or Parallels?

    Member Since
    Dec 17, 2007
    Location
    Chi-town
    Posts
    10
    Specs:
    Macbook 2.2Ghz Intel Core Duo 2 (Santa Rosa) with 1gb (will be upgraded to 4Gb), 120GB hard drive
    i do have a macbook and just switched, i tried both vista and xp on parallels. all i can say is that xp is much faster and vista kept on giving me problems??? for my expierence i say go xp or try both...

  7. #7
    Windows Vista or XP under Fusion or Parallels?
    PerryLynch's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 24, 2007
    Posts
    235
    Specs:
    17" MacBook Pro 4GB
    I've got Vista and XP installed using Fusion. I've got to say that Vista is as big a disappointment on virtual hardware as it is on the real thing. Microsoft has even changed their tune and actively developed Service Pack 3 for XP, as so many people are rejecting Vista.

    Don't get me wrong: Vista can be a great OS. But when you've bought sufficient hardware to allow it optimal performance, you may as well by a Macbook Pro...
    Perry M Lynch, CISSP CISA
    Mac Newbie, Security not-so-newbie

  8. #8
    Windows Vista or XP under Fusion or Parallels?
    NolaWegs's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 02, 2006
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    146
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro 2.16 GHz CD 2GB RAM; iPhone
    I'm not so sure how to get vista to run faster (maybe commit for of your processor to the virtual machine), this can be done in the preferences setting in fusion. it might be better for you just to run xp, as there aren't really that many reasons to use vista over xp.

  9. #9
    Windows Vista or XP under Fusion or Parallels?
    Aqua's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 05, 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    452
    Specs:
    Macbook Pro, 2.4GHz Core2 Duo 10.6.8, MacMini
    Most ppl are avoiding vista... as was said earlier xp3 is on it's way soon too but sp2 is good. As with XP when it first came out it took a long time to get bugs worked out and for companies to make drivers for it. It seems tho that Vista is proving to be slower for this and might also be a like Mellenium was in the xp world (a dud and bad choice which a lot of manufacturers even refused to make drivers for) a lot of things are still not compatible with vista yet, but there are still PC users who are baffled as to why vista seems to run better on a mac lol that being said, if the above posters are saying it's slow on the vm then xp might be your safest choice if you know it will run what you need it to run and just wait until it becomes more compatible with more later...
    invincible ignorance is an example of ignorance that can not be removed by any amount of evidence. It's now a widespread form of pollution. (Revised quote) An apple a day, keeps the psychiatrist away.. If you play a Windows install CD backwards it has satanic verses

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. MBP 13 2.4 - Parallels 6 or VM Fusion (Windows 7 x86 or x64)
    By kndawg07 in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-25-2011, 12:48 PM
  2. Considering running Windows w/Bootcamp or parallels or fusion
    By Proff49 in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-17-2009, 03:32 AM
  3. XP or Vista? Parallels or Fusion? I really can't decide...
    By skaheadpunk in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-15-2008, 04:16 PM
  4. WinXP with Vista Transformation Pack 8 in Fusion/Parallels?
    By seasurfer in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-27-2007, 10:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •