02-22-2006, 11:00 PM #1x2xwakegurlx2xGuestHow do i take this kinda of picture?
could someone please help me out. how do i take the kind of picture where the main object, or person is in focus, perfect, no bluriness...then the background and everything around them is not in focus and very blurry, and the moving things in the back blurred like moving things usually are. does anyone know what i mean?
thanks..and if it helps, i am using a panasonic lumix camera, if that makes any difference
02-22-2006, 11:05 PM #2Originally Posted by x2xwakegurlx2x
I have no idea, this pic was a fluke. I am by no means a photographer, but I am sure someone here will be able to answer that for you.__________________________________________________
Posting and YOU|Forum Community Guidelines|The Apple Product Cycle|Forum Courtesy
mac: a waterproof raincoat made of rubberized fabric
MAC: a data communication protocol sub-layer, also known as the Media Access Control
Mac: a brand name which covers several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc.
02-22-2006, 11:09 PM #3x2xwakegurlx2xGuest
ya, thats exactly what i mean. anyone know how to do those?
keep in mind i am new to photography and have no idea what all the big words and such mean...let alone know how to use my camera completly, so please explain it in simple terms if possible. thanks
02-22-2006, 11:24 PM #4
- Member Since
- Jan 08, 2005
- New Jersey
- Mac Pro 8x3.0ghz 12gb ram 8800GT , MBP 2.16 2GB Ram 17 inch.
02-22-2006, 11:29 PM #5
Set your f-stop wide open. The more your f-stop is open, the shorter your focal range.Delusions are often functional. A motherís opinions about her childrenís beauty, intelligence, goodness, et cetera ad nauseam, keep her from drowning them at birth.
02-23-2006, 02:34 AM #6
- Member Since
- Jan 12, 2005
- 12" 1Ghz PB 768Mb 10.4.5 30Gb Video iPod 40Gb 3G iPod 1Gb iPod Shuffle
yea you need a high f/number high aperture
what ever your camera calls it, unless you have an SLR its unlikely that your camera will do this so you may have to PS it
Apple, think different
02-23-2006, 03:22 PM #7
- Member Since
- Jan 06, 2005
- dual g4 1ghz
its called depth of field (DOF)
like stated, your f-stop should be wide open
the lower the number the wider its open
the camera focuses on the area in focus and everything else get out of focus faster
when used with a telephoto or zoom lens the more of the effect this has
02-23-2006, 03:52 PM #8x2xwakegurlx2xGuest
thanks for all the replies...now can someone tell me what the heck f-stop is? lol thanks
02-23-2006, 06:32 PM #9
- Member Since
- Feb 17, 2006
- High Wycombe, Just outside London, England
- 20" iMac 2.0Ghz, 2Gb RAM Early 2006, 30Gb iPod 5th Gen. 15" MacBookPro, 2.33GHz
An f stop is a reference to the diameter of the aperture (hole) through which the light passes before it hits the recording medium (film or digital chip).
The fstop is referred to as a number and they go in the following order.
1.4, 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22, etc.......
The lower the number the wider the aperture thus the more light that passes through the hole. The more light that passes through the hole the brighter the image. However you may then need to adjust the shutter speed accordingly to get a correctly exposed image.
How does this relate to the blurry background?
Well the larger the aperture (smaller the fstop number) the less that you get in focus in front and behind the point of focus. For example should you focus on a person and set an fstop of 1.4 you might get about 20cm's in front and behind the person in focus before the rest falls into an unfocused blur.
However if you focus on the same person and set an fstop of 22 then you might get 5 metres in front and behind the person in focus before the rest falls into an unfocused blur.
Exactly how far you get in focus in front and behind is all down to another much more complicated calculation that you really don't need to know about.
I would say have a play and experiment. Just remember that the more in front and behind your subject you want to be in focus the higher an fstop you need to set.
02-23-2006, 07:24 PM #10
- Member Since
- Jan 30, 2005
- Fort Worth, Texas
- Mac Pro, 8-Core 2.8Ghz, 10GB RAM, 2x1TB HDDs, iPod U2 Edition
The pic that D3v1L80Y posted and I think you were asking about has more of a motion blur behind it not a focal length blur.... The only way I know of to get a "motion blur" effect behind the subject is to use a slower shutter speed or longer exposure time (around 1/60 - 1/15) And have both you and the subject move together at the same speed through the location. By keeping the individual in the same part of the picture and moving through the room the subject will remain fairly sharp while the background will have the motion effect. You can also try rotating around the subject quickly while they continue to stay turned toward you... These can be really tough techniques to master... but as D3v1L80Y showed us it can have awesome looking effects... even by accident
That being said if someone knows an easier way please tell... this method is really a pain."If you had a friend who was a tightrope walker, and you were walking down a sidewalk, and he fell, that would be completely unacceptable." -Mitch Hedberg
02-24-2006, 02:28 AM #11quanzGuestOriginally Posted by sarahsboy18
if anyone is wondering why this effect happen becasue of the f stop here is a short explination
when you have an f stop liek 1.8 you are letting in more light, you do this by using more of the lens. the downside to this is that when you use more of the lens, and the lens has a curve to it. As you use more of the curve you get less in focus becasue the optics of the lens dont allow light from those great angles to be seen in focus.
f 22 uses a smaller part of the lens, this means almost everythign is in focuse becasue nothign falls outside of the curve of the lens.
its really beyond my skill to explain it any better than that, so I apologize if it ddint help.
02-25-2006, 09:50 PM #12
Originally Posted by sarahsboy18
- Member Since
- Jul 07, 2005
- North Boston, NY
- PowerMac G5 2.3 ghz 6.5 GB ram 20" cinema display ..15" Macbook Pro 2.33 Core 2 Duo 2 Gig RAM
Yes, that is motion blur. It looks like it was added with photoshop, however can also be accomplished by panning the camera with your subject.
If you are using a point and shoot digital camera, it will be difficult to accomplish a shallow depth of field image due to the sensor size. You could shoot with a aperture (F/stop) of f/2.8 and still have 2 or 3 feet if not the entire scene in focus. That makes these little cameras great for people wanting to shoot macros getting alot of the object in focus but a bit*& for anyone wishing to get the shallow depth of field.
If you are using an SLR style camera a cheap lens that does this great is the 50mm f/1.8 or f/1.4 I think both Nikon and Canon make these model lenses and they are quite reasonably priced.
I think this image was taken with the 50mm, notice the object the blacksmith is striking is in focus while all in front and behind is not. The portions not in focus are referred to as Bokeh. The further away from the focus point you get the more blurred the objects will become, so ideally the more blurred you want the background the farther away it needs to be from the subject.
02-27-2006, 02:33 AM #13quanzGuestOriginally Posted by Odin_aa
03-01-2006, 08:41 AM #14ush flynnGuest
hey all, first post here.
About this type of picture. You may have seen many images like this or taken at night where you have motion trails from bright objects all over the background but your subject is well lit and not blurred at all. WELL
Most SLR's and prosumer cameras have a function called rear-sync for the flash, what happens is the shutter will open for say 1 second, on a small aperture such as f8 - f11 this will allow things like car tail-lights and reflections to make a trail on your image, then right at the last 1/4 of the second (assuming the flash sync ins 1/250) the flash will fire and your image will be completed with an illuminated subject
hope this helps
03-02-2006, 05:31 PM #15
- Member Since
- Dec 18, 2004
The picture in the second post looks like a pan. The background looks like it is blurred horizontally. You can do that by having lets say 1/40 shutter speed. Now follow the person on a bike, car. etc...and click. If focus was right the person will be in focus and background will be blurred horizontally.
If you just want background out of focus (bokeh) you can do it two ways. Long zoom, or large aperture 1.4, 1.8, 2.8 etc.
Here is a picture.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By tdbean in forum Images, Graphic Design, and Digital PhotographyReplies: 4Last Post: 05-17-2014, 04:43 PM
By brighambartol in forum Movies and VideoReplies: 0Last Post: 02-03-2011, 08:52 PM
By Tyson in forum OS X - Apps and GamesReplies: 2Last Post: 02-25-2008, 11:04 AM
By Retox in forum Apple DesktopsReplies: 2Last Post: 10-03-2007, 10:06 PM
By shaun89 in forum Other Hardware and PeripheralsReplies: 5Last Post: 03-04-2005, 04:07 AM