Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: .jpg? .jpeg?

  1. #1
    .jpg? .jpeg?

    Member Since
    Mar 14, 2005
    Posts
    275
    Specs:
    iMac G5 17", 1.8 Ghz, 1GB RAM
    .jpg? .jpeg?
    What in the world is the difference between .jpg and .jpeg files? And which one do you guys think is better? What extension (not only .jpg or .jpeg; all extensions) should I use for my pictures? Thanks!

  2. #2
    .jpg? .jpeg?

    Member Since
    Jul 22, 2003
    Location
    Hamilton College
    Posts
    6,999
    Specs:
    20" iMac C2D 2.16ghz, 13" MacBook 2.0ghz, 60gb iPod vid, 1gb nano
    No difference between jpg and jpeg they mean the same thing its just the extension people decide to use (Kind of like .htm and .html).
    Don't forget to use the new User Reputation System

  3. #3
    .jpg? .jpeg?

    Member Since
    Mar 14, 2005
    Posts
    275
    Specs:
    iMac G5 17", 1.8 Ghz, 1GB RAM
    What is the best extension to use (out of all available ones)?

  4. #4
    Kokopelli
    Guest
    It does not matter, whichever you like. I use jpg out of habit in order to comply with the 8.3 file name format.

    Also you seem to be getting file format and file extension confused.

  5. #5
    .jpg? .jpeg?

    Member Since
    Mar 14, 2005
    Posts
    275
    Specs:
    iMac G5 17", 1.8 Ghz, 1GB RAM
    What's the 8.3 file name format, and what's the difference between file format and extension? :dummy: :dummy:

  6. #6
    Kokopelli
    Guest
    8.3 means no more than 8 characters in the first part of the name (before the ".") and the extension should not exceed 3 characters. It is a hold over from DOS, which could not exceed those limits.

    File name is just that, the name of the file. File format is how the data in the file is structured. The extension is an indicator of what the format of a file is, but not a gaurantee. A jar labeled "Sugar" tends to suggest that there is sugar inside, but if you wanted to you could put flour in it, or sand for that matter. It just makes the most sense to put sugar in a jar labeled sugar, flour in a jar labeled flour, etc.

    Generally for photographs jpeg format is a good compromise between size and quality. On the high end for digital photographs is RAW. Some of the professionals on the board can probably break down the various formats better than I.

    EDIT: So when you ask what extension to use, jpg, jpeg, or other it is a little off. I would use "jpg" for jpeg files, "bmp" for bitmaps, "gif" for GIFS, "doc" for Word documents, etc... As to which file format to use, the paragraph above is my answer to that.

  7. #7
    .jpg? .jpeg?
    Macman's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 30, 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,374
    Specs:
    PowerMac G4 Cube 450mhz 832mb
    yea, you could have files pic.jpg, pic.jpeg, and they're the same, though I believe mac os x only supports up to 3 characters in the extension.

  8. #8
    meltbanana314
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Macman
    yea, you could have files pic.jpg, pic.jpeg, and they're the same, though I believe mac os x only supports up to 3 characters in the extension.
    Then how come I have .opml and .mpeg files scattered on my desktop?

  9. #9
    .jpg? .jpeg?
    Macman's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 30, 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,374
    Specs:
    PowerMac G4 Cube 450mhz 832mb
    never heard of .opml before, as far as the mpgs, they'd only be there if you put them there.

  10. #10
    .jpg? .jpeg?

    Member Since
    Mar 30, 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,744
    Specs:
    12" Apple PowerBook G4 (1.5GHz)
    OS X supports arbitrarily long extensions (for example, .webloc for web bookmark files or .plist for preferences files) or even no extension at all (for files that have Classic Type/Creator codes embedded.)

    Current versions of Windows also support long extensions, though I'm not sure how long. Previous versions were more picky; hence *******ized extensions like .jpg and .htm

  11. #11
    meltbanana314
    Guest
    .opml is the standard format for importing and exporting RSS/Atom feeds to and from applications such as NetNewsWire or PulpFiction.

    I'm actually trying to start a new trend by asking people what RSS feeds they read (sort of akin to the whole "What's On Your Dock?" Giles Turnbull started)

    (and when I was reffering to them being on my desktop, I didn't mean "why are they there" - i meant "if OS X only has the capability to show three character extensions, then i must be imagining the files on my computer with four character extensions.")

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-26-2013, 08:41 PM
  2. JPG for MAC to JPG Windows or Photoshop
    By quiquerivera in forum Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-23-2010, 07:02 PM
  3. How to convert JPEG into JPG
    By zombiepiccer16 in forum Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-16-2009, 02:46 PM
  4. HELP! DV still to Jpeg?
    By cameronryan in forum Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-13-2007, 05:09 AM
  5. How do you make a 2mb.jpg a 1mb.jpg
    By iNAP in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-06-2005, 07:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •