Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!

    Member Since
    Feb 24, 2007
    Posts
    114
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!
    Hi everyone.

    I use Aperture to manage my photos, and although I am somewhat of a novice at it, I can tell that a lot of tools would be very handy. For example, I love these 2 sliders under the adjustments tab, saturate and vibrance. As you can tell, I love putting them up all the way.


    With my library of over 5000 pictures, I've gone through many shots and flicked the saturation and vibrance all as extreme as it can get, and people (who aren't really into photography) have said that the colors are amazing and the pictures are great.

    However, after I moved the sliders all the way to the right for like the hundredth time, it came to me...do my pictures look unnatural? am I taking away from the shot? will this have any consequences in the future, if i wish to change it back (i.e. will the quality be affected)?

    Here are some examples...

    Here is the mexico pavilion in disney world, all saturated/vibrated and the colors popping out...


    and here's the original shot, without any of that:


    I mean, my eyes are drawn to the first one obviously, but what do you guys think? I kind of miss the realism in the second one.

    Here's a shot from Disney's All Star Movies resort, all saturated:


    and here's the original shot without any edits:



    Here's perhaps one of the best examples of saturated vs none of that;

    saturated and vibrated to the extreme:

    and the original:



    Can someone please give me some tips? I can't decide whether I LOVE the saturation or if it's unrealistic.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!
    skye's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 12, 2006
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    1,224
    Specs:
    Macbook 2.0ghz coeduo 1GB RAM 80 GB HD SuperDrive
    I think that though the color looks cool, it detracts from the original image...
    Blog- My random musings as I document the spiritual changes I go through.

    "And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love." 1st Corinithians 3:13

  3. #3
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!
    fleurya's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 18, 2006
    Location
    Anytown, USA
    Posts
    4,925
    Specs:
    27" iMac 2.7GHz Core i5, iPhone 4S, 3rd gen iPad
    The one with Buzz Lightyear doesn't seem as bad b/c there's a lot of bright, artificial colors anyway that are enhanced with the saturation. But the other photos with the more natural colors don't look good that way. They kind of hurt to look at. That's not an insult, it's just an observation. There's other ways to enhance coloring without just over-saturating.
    "Give so much time to the improvement of yourself that you have no time to criticize others"

  4. #4
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!
    Mama Luigi's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 22, 2009
    Posts
    369
    Specs:
    Phenom X3 720, Radeon 4870 1GB, 6GB DDR2-800, 32" LCD TV
    Quote Originally Posted by skye View Post
    I think that though the color looks cool, it detracts from the original image...
    Agreed. It's cool for occasional use, like when you want to make something look cartoonish (I think it works okay with the Toy Story picture since that's all about bright colors). But you shouldn't use it for everything. I also think it makes the pictures look a little grainier.

  5. #5
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!

    Member Since
    Apr 12, 2008
    Posts
    74
    I think I understand the effect you are trying to get and as a previous poster stated, I think you get that effect in the buzz photo. However, I don't think that effect works for all photographs. Really need to look at the content and understand the natural limitations of the subjects involved.

  6. #6
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!
    IanCT's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 25, 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    497
    Specs:
    iMac 24" 2.66 C2D, 13" MacBook i7 2.9GHz, iPad 3, iPhone 4
    Try changing the saturation of different colors (Red, Magenta, Yellow, Blue, Cyan) found at the bottom of the adjustment toolbox.

    Increasing yellow to make the pyramid stand out more, or blue or green to make the palm tree of ocean stand out, etc...

    I have an example of some lions I took some photos of that I'll post. I desaturated the green grassy hills in the background, and increased the yellows and reds to make the lions stand out.

  7. #7
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!
    Dysfunction's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 17, 2008
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    6,821
    Specs:
    Way... way too many specs to list.
    The increased saturation and vibrancy also highlight exposure issues
    mike
    This machine kills fascists
    Got # ? phear the command line!

  8. #8
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!
    MacBurg's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 26, 2007
    Location
    Waihi Beach, New Zealand
    Posts
    218
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro 15" 2.6Ghz | 200GB 7200 | 4GB Ram | 32GB iPod Touch 2G
    Have a quick read here to understand the difference between the Saturation and Vibrance adjustment tools.

  9. #9
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!

    Member Since
    Jan 26, 2009
    Posts
    31
    Well, it all comes to what you like. You are going to get the phone book of responses with "do I do this too much...."

    There are colors that look realistic and those that don't. Most photography that has won awards, etc... has made a statement either by subject, or the way the subject is portrayed with the use of light and color. BW photography is all about the light and the subject; color photography has a bit more to do with light and color than the subject.

    You appear to enjoy the look of a bit unrealistic saturation of color, but sometimes in real life, this exists, just not usually with so many different elements to a photo.

    Here are some guidelines to go by:

    The human eye moves this way:
    1) B&W to color
    2) dark to light
    3) blurry to defined/sharp
    4) dull/washed out to contrast

    With this in mind, you may be able to direct those in your photos to your main subject a bit better by making the key element of your photo just the way you like it (i.e. turbo charged sat and vib), then mask in photoshop those other elements (such as the crowd of visitors) to reduce the sat and vib on them by 50%.


    This will probably raise the hairs from some that have photography degrees, but this is what I have observed from those photos people would pay thousands for.
    No signature

  10. #10
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!
    Dysfunction's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 17, 2008
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    6,821
    Specs:
    Way... way too many specs to list.
    Quote Originally Posted by Macaflan View Post
    Well, it all comes to what you like. You are going to get the phone book of responses with "do I do this too much...."

    There are colors that look realistic and those that don't. Most photography that has won awards, etc... has made a statement either by subject, or the way the subject is portrayed with the use of light and color. BW photography is all about the light and the subject; color photography has a bit more to do with light and color than the subject.

    You appear to enjoy the look of a bit unrealistic saturation of color, but sometimes in real life, this exists, just not usually with so many different elements to a photo.

    Here are some guidelines to go by:

    The human eye moves this way:
    1) B&W to color
    2) dark to light
    3) blurry to defined/sharp
    4) dull/washed out to contrast

    With this in mind, you may be able to direct those in your photos to your main subject a bit better by making the key element of your photo just the way you like it (i.e. turbo charged sat and vib), then mask in photoshop those other elements (such as the crowd of visitors) to reduce the sat and vib on them by 50%.


    This will probably raise the hairs from some that have photography degrees, but this is what I have observed from those photos people would pay thousands for.
    there is plenty of excellent photography that ignores normal technical rules, exposure, composition etc... but that is not to say that it is not useful to learn these base rules.

    BTW all photography is worthless without subject IMO.
    mike
    This machine kills fascists
    Got # ? phear the command line!

  11. #11
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!

    Member Since
    Jan 15, 2009
    Posts
    26
    I don't think supersaturating an image is necessarily a bad thing, but I think it has limitations and applies better to some objects than others.

    In my personal opinion, which should have no impact on your photography, I think there's a stopping point with both that's below full blast, even on shots you want well saturated.

    Like I said though, subject matter is everything. If I shoot a portrait, I'm likely to do per color saturation adjustments (I use Lightroom, but the concept is similar) and use very little additional saturation/vibrance across the board... otherwise you end up with attack of the carrot people... but if I'm shooting a flower or an inanimate object or the like, I'll probably blow it past reality, even to the point of adjusting the hue slightly in places.

    If you're really into super saturation and sort of bending the rules, you might look into lomography. A lot of lomo cameras will come out with insane colors. It's really a fantastic effect.

    Bottom line, like others have said, they're your photos. You can do whatever the **** you want with them. The end product should be for you and nobody else.

  12. #12
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!
    scathe's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 12, 2009
    Location
    Prague, Czech Republic
    Posts
    1,096
    Specs:
    2,4Ghz 15" unibody
    it all comes down to what you prefer, ****, if you will enjoy looking at your photos all blurry then go for it, if you like maxed out saturation, go for it ...

    in the palm image I think some oversaturation works well on the leaves but it's ridiculous on the background

    personally I don't like applying filters to the whole image ... Macaflab mentioned masking and that's the way to go for me too

    but it is fun to experiment with what look you like (not always by editing though) and that's what it's all about

  13. #13
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!

    Member Since
    Nov 25, 2007
    Posts
    24
    I took the liberty of adjusting it myself.
    I hope you dont mid but I played with your picture for a few
    minutes.This still might not be what you are after but I thought I'd give it a shot. I think you are trying to get results by attacking the area you want to fix. Sometimes its better to adjust other parts of the pic to draw more attention to your subject. Thinkf of it as music. If you want to increase the bass it might be better to reduce the treble a little to enhance the bass. just a thought.

  14. #14
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!

    Member Since
    Nov 25, 2007
    Posts
    24
    And another

  15. #15
    Do I saturate/vibrate my pictures too much? I'd love to hear your advice!

    Member Since
    Feb 24, 2007
    Posts
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by Vomit Stain View Post
    I hope you dont mid but I played with your picture for a few
    minutes.This still might not be what you are after but I thought I'd give it a shot. I think you are trying to get results by attacking the area you want to fix. Sometimes its better to adjust other parts of the pic to draw more attention to your subject. Thinkf of it as music. If you want to increase the bass it might be better to reduce the treble a little to enhance the bass. just a thought.
    wow, very cool! thanks a lot for taking some time and playing around with them, i appreciate it.

    now, how would i go about applying filters to only parts of the image?

    thanks!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-16-2015, 06:13 PM
  2. Would love your advice!
    By greyhound rick in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-08-2015, 10:52 PM
  3. Would love your advice re: new iMac
    By greyhound rick in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-21-2014, 10:06 PM
  4. Potential Mac Learning Resource - Would Love To Hear Your Thoughts!
    By merkman in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-06-2010, 03:53 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •