Go Back  Mac-Forums.com  > Software > Windows, Classic, Linux, and Other OS > Windows - VMware Fusion 2 tweeks?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-15-2009, 07:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
Attimus

 
Member Since: Oct 07, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 40
Attimus is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 15" MBP 2.53, 4gigs RAM, 250hd
Windows - VMware Fusion 2 tweeks?

I've successfully installed Vista64 and upgraded it to Windows 7-64bit. Now, i have it set for one processor and 2 gigs of ram. Is there any reason for me to not have it set to use the full resources of 2 processors and 4 gigs of ram?

Does it slow down my mac side or run hotter, or colder, if i turn the resources up? Now, probably wont use my mac side so much while VMware is running, but thought i'd ask.

I use AutoCAD, Revit, and Rhino 3d. These programs are resource hogs.
Attimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 07:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
vansmith

 
vansmith's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,582
vansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: 2.1C2D/4GB/320GB
You can't allocate all of your RAM to a VM because that would leave no RAM for anything else, not even Fusion or OS X. Therefore, it doesn't make any sense. Truthfully, if a program really requires that many resources, you should be running Windows through Boot Camp.
__________________
"It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Immanuel Kant
Website : Twitter
Important Links: Community Guidelines : DVD Ripping Rules
M-F MotM - April 2009.
vansmith is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 08:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
SammySlim

 
Member Since: Feb 12, 2008
Posts: 483
SammySlim will become famous soon enough
I agree with vansmith. I would keep at least 1 GB for OSX.
Cheers
SammySlim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 09:25 PM   #4 (permalink)
cwa107

 
cwa107's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 20, 2006
Location: Middletown, PA, USA
Posts: 14,610
cwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15.4 MBP 2.4GHz Penryn C2D, 4GB RAM, 320GB HDD
Not sure why you would run a 64-bit version of Windows in a VM that has less than 4GB of RAM allocated to it.
__________________

Community Guidelines
cwa107 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 12:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
Attimus

 
Member Since: Oct 07, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 40
Attimus is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 15" MBP 2.53, 4gigs RAM, 250hd
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwa107 View Post
Not sure why you would run a 64-bit version of Windows in a VM that has less than 4GB of RAM allocated to it.
I'd like to upgrade it to 8 gigs later, but that's not while i put 64 on it. It was that i simply already had a legal copy of Vista64

my acer with vista 64 runs like a dream and hasn't had a single glitch in the year i've owned it. It only has 4 gigs of ram.

Why wouldn't i put windows 64 on a VM that has less than 4 gb or ram?
Attimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 12:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
cwa107

 
cwa107's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 20, 2006
Location: Middletown, PA, USA
Posts: 14,610
cwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15.4 MBP 2.4GHz Penryn C2D, 4GB RAM, 320GB HDD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Attimus View Post
I'd like to upgrade it to 8 gigs later, but that's not while i put 64 on it. It was that i simply already had a legal copy of Vista64

my acer with vista 64 runs like a dream and hasn't had a single glitch in the year i've owned it. It only has 4 gigs of ram.

Why wouldn't i put windows 64 on a VM that has less than 4 gb or ram?
There is zero benefit, particularly in a VM, to running 64-bit if you aren't using at least 4GB of RAM. But hey, if you have it already, might as well use it.
__________________

Community Guidelines
cwa107 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 01:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
Attimus

 
Member Since: Oct 07, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 40
Attimus is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 15" MBP 2.53, 4gigs RAM, 250hd
so my poor acer only has the minimum of ram needed for vista 64?

Last edited by cwa107; 10-16-2009 at 01:36 PM. Reason: language
Attimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 02:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
vansmith

 
vansmith's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,582
vansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: 2.1C2D/4GB/320GB
That's not what cwa meant. The primary benefit of using 64-bit Windows is that it can address more than 4GB of RAM which is not possible in 32-bit Windows. Thus, if you're not using more than 4GB of RAM, there aren't really any differences or benefits.
__________________
"It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Immanuel Kant
Website : Twitter
Important Links: Community Guidelines : DVD Ripping Rules
M-F MotM - April 2009.
vansmith is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VMware Fusion Is Haunting Me/Stacks Acting Funny HELP PLEASE! captaincaliena OS X - Operating System 8 10-05-2009 07:08 PM
SL 10.6.1 & VMware Fusion version 1.1.1 (72241) nichlaus41 Apple Notebooks 1 09-20-2009 10:08 PM
VMWare Fusion for 17.99 - new version! lbrewer42 OS X - Applications and Games 2 12-10-2008 02:34 AM
Vista 64 or 32 for Bootcamp AND VMware Fusion Nate55 Switcher Hangout 1 06-20-2008 04:18 AM

 
 
 
     
Home Calendar Get New
     

Copyright ©2001-2009 Mac-Forums.com. All Rights Reserved. A division of iNET Interactive.

Other iNET Interactive Sites: Web Hosting Talk | Swish Talk | Hosting Catalog.com| Dev Papers| Deleted Domains| Hot Scripts

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.