Go Back  Mac-Forums.com  > Software > Windows, Classic, Linux, and Other OS > MacBook Pro - New MBP.. 64 or 32 bit windows?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-27-2008, 06:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
gavelcoy

 
Member Since: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 16
gavelcoy is on a distinguished road
MacBook Pro - New MBP.. 64 or 32 bit windows?

I want to play the orange box through steam on my MBP, so I'm going to install a version of windows xp through boot camp.

I heard that Apple finally got 64 bit drivers installed on the Apple install discs. Is this true? And should I even go 64 bit or stick with 32?

I'm thinking 64 bit so I can utilize the full amount of RAM in my computer and hardware might run the graphics a bit faster.
gavelcoy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 07:02 PM   #2 (permalink)
Kash

 
Kash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 8,024
Kash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD
Stick with 32-bit. The drivers are more mature, which means fewer hardware issues compared to 64-bit, and you won't see any performance benefit with 64-bit if you just want to play games.

I can understand the desire to fully utilize the 4GB of RAM, but you'll be limited by the graphics card way before a lack of RAM becomes an issue. Plus, 3.3GB is plenty for games.
__________________

June 2007
July 2009
Kash is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 07:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
gavelcoy

 
Member Since: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 16
gavelcoy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kash View Post
Stick with 32-bit. The drivers are more mature, which means fewer hardware issues compared to 64-bit, and you won't see any performance benefit with 64-bit if you just want to play games.

I can understand the desire to fully utilize the 4GB of RAM, but you'll be limited by the graphics card way before a lack of RAM becomes an issue. Plus, 3.3GB is plenty for games.
Stock is 2GB, haven't upgraded yet. So if 3.3 is from 4, would I be getting something like 1.3 from 2?
gavelcoy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 07:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
cwa107

 
cwa107's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 20, 2006
Location: Middletown, PA, USA
Posts: 14,607
cwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15.4 MBP 2.4GHz Penryn C2D, 4GB RAM, 320GB HDD
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavelcoy View Post
Stock is 2GB, haven't upgraded yet. So if 3.3 is from 4, would I be getting something like 1.3 from 2?
There is no advantage to running 64-bit unless you have a need to address more than 3GB of RAM.
__________________

Community Guidelines
cwa107 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 07:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
gavelcoy

 
Member Since: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 16
gavelcoy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwa107 View Post
There is no advantage to running 64-bit unless you have a need to address more than 3GB of RAM.
Good to know, thanks!
gavelcoy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 07:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
Kash

 
Kash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 8,024
Kash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavelcoy View Post
Stock is 2GB, haven't upgraded yet. So if 3.3 is from 4, would I be getting something like 1.3 from 2?
Haha, no, it doesn't work that way. The maximum addressable RAM by a 32-bit OS is 3.3GB. It's not a percentage thing, so if you had 2GB installed, you would be able to use all 2GB.
__________________

June 2007
July 2009
Kash is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 04:02 AM   #7 (permalink)
INTELligent
Banned
 
Member Since: Jan 30, 2008
Location: Close to nowhere, far from anywhere
Posts: 104
INTELligent is infamous around these parts
Mac Specs: Mac Mini
Actually guys... I run 32-bit on my laptop and 64-bit on my desktop(Vista)... There is no difference, the 64-bit runs quite a bit smoother actually and the drivers are indifferent. If it says 64-bit then it's for 64-bit, if it says 32-bit then it's for 32-bit. And when it comes to drivers, the main drivers you have to worry about are your video drivers, nVidia and ATi both make drivers labeled for 32-bit or 64-bit usage.

You might as well go with Vista, your Macbook will have no problem with it. Since it is Vista, go ahead and get the 64-bit, The Orange Box and Steam both run on it without a hitch. I think Steam runs better on Vista x64 than it did when I had my old PC with XP x86. Unless you are messing with these crappy applications made by some foreigner from a third world country in Visual Basic, you will have no problem with program compatibility.

And the overly obsessive Mac fans here will probably attempt to tell you how "bad" Vista is. They haven't a clue because they've probably never experienced it first hand. They'd prefer to get it the 'he said, she said' method.

My vote goes to 64-bit Vista...
INTELligent is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
School Windows Requirments Met by MBP? purpleshroom17 Windows, Classic, Linux, and Other OS 5 04-28-2008 11:01 PM
Re-install Windows XP Pro using Bootcamp 1.2 on a Macbook kahmedsid Windows, Classic, Linux, and Other OS 2 11-12-2007 11:58 AM
A newbie comments on his first experience with Parallels 3150 NJRonbo Windows, Classic, Linux, and Other OS 0 02-02-2007 07:41 AM
Increase size of Windows partition on MBP corysw Switcher Hangout 2 09-23-2006 11:24 AM
BF2 disk drive and installation problems (Windows XP Home on a MBP) wcwalsh Windows, Classic, Linux, and Other OS 1 06-12-2006 05:12 PM

 
 
 
     
Home Calendar Get New
     

Copyright ©2001-2009 Mac-Forums.com. All Rights Reserved. A division of iNET Interactive.

Other iNET Interactive Sites: Web Hosting Talk | Swish Talk | Hosting Catalog.com| Dev Papers| Deleted Domains| Hot Scripts

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.