Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Where It's At

  1. #1


    Member Since
    Jan 17, 2007
    Location
    Illinois, Florida
    Posts
    19
    Specs:
    MBP, MB Air, Iphone
    Where It's At
    Got a new Mac Air yesterday with the SSD drive. I also have a MBC, 2.4 with a 160 gig drive. Let me tell ya, the Air is so fast at loading programs, that it makes the MBC look positively SLOW. I know the SSD is a very expensive option but this is the way of the future; a slower processor and yet at least 1.5-2 times the speed

  2. #2

    theonegod's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 02, 2006
    Posts
    476
    Specs:
    24" 2.8ghz IMAC, MB Pro
    Hate to burst your bubble but your speed has nothing to do with your SSD. That was a decent waste of money that doesn't increase HD speed and only allows for a tiny increase in battery life.

    http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/06/m...ere-to-be-fou/

  3. #3


    Member Since
    Jan 17, 2007
    Location
    Illinois, Florida
    Posts
    19
    Specs:
    MBP, MB Air, Iphone
    Quote Originally Posted by theonegod View Post
    Hate to burst your bubble but your speed has nothing to do with your SSD. That was a decent waste of money that doesn't increase HD speed and only allows for a tiny increase in battery life.

    http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/06/m...ere-to-be-fou/
    I read all the articles too; this a test by a user that uses both, an HDD and the SSD, and feel the pin prick, there is a HUGE difference in speed. the processor is 1.8 vs 2.4 in the MBP.
    You can't live and die by what reporters say, (look at Geo Bush and the WMD's) try it yourself in real world conditions

  4. #4

    theonegod's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 02, 2006
    Posts
    476
    Specs:
    24" 2.8ghz IMAC, MB Pro
    I dont doubt you are seeing programs open quicker. But you wont find file copy to be faster, or any form of sustained disk use.

    Quickly opening a program is the kind of thing that may seem nifty and a good test of speed when you first get a new computer but later you find that in actual read/write access overtime there is no benefit.

  5. #5

    Kash's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 03, 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    9,385
    Specs:
    Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G
    Plus there's the placebo effect. You subconsciously think of the SSD as being faster, and thus it "feels" faster than a normal drive.

    June 2007
    July 2009

  6. #6


    Member Since
    Feb 03, 2008
    Location
    Surrey BC Canada
    Posts
    444
    Specs:
    Mac Mini 2.5 i5/16Gb/500Gb/Radeon 6630M-256MB
    In all actuality, solid state drives are quite a bit faster than platter spinning ones, a little while back Maximum PC (yeah I know) did a head to head to head, compared a notebook SSD to the fastest Serial ATA platter spinner, a Western Digital Raptor, the little mTron SSD quite simply BLEW the Raptor away in almost all aspects from seek times to sustained data rates...., for the full story, just google Maximum PC mTron Review.....I have the print version. It's always been said lately that the biggest bottleneck in computer performance, regardless if it's Mac or a nasty Wintel machine, it is the hard drive.....getting data to and from the memory and processor from the platters....SSDs are quickly showing that the bottleneck is decreasing significantly
    This is a multiplatform home !

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •