Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800
    Stetwin's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 08, 2007
    Posts
    95
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800
    I知 looking to pick up my external Hard Drive this weekend and was just wondering how big of a difference (in terms of real time) the three interfaces are?

    Also when it comes to home/day to day use is FW 800 really worth the extra money or would USB 2.0 and FW 400 be fast enough? I知 mainly looking for something to back up my music collection, photos and also use it when leopard arrives for time machine, I知 looking to buy one of the WD MyBook externals if that helps in any way to answering my question

    /Ste

  2. #2
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800

    Member Since
    Apr 28, 2006
    Posts
    2,542
    Specs:
    iMac Core Duo 20", iBook G4, iPhone 8GB :)
    I would say use a FW400 drive. Firewire 800 is only for high speed video editing and it also needs a drive fast enough to cope up with those speeds. For your purposes, a Firewire400 drive is perfect. Even USB is fine, but it will take up a USB port on your machine which you would need for some other device.

  3. #3
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800
    dtravis7's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 04, 2005
    Location
    Modesto, Ca.
    Posts
    28,477
    Specs:
    iMac late 2007 10.11.b4, iMac 2008 10.10.5, Macbook2007 10.7.5, Mac Mini 10.7.5, iPhone 3GS Note 8!!
    http://www.barefeats.com/usb2.html

    I have done many Timed tests here at my place using PC's and Macs. Don't go by the numbers. USB 2.0 claims to be 480 Mbps but look at the real life tests. Firewire 400 always wins in any timed file transfer test.

    A close friend and I zipped up his MP3 collection and did a file transfer from his Internal SATA 10K drive to a USB 2.0 and Firewire 400 and later Firewire 800 external. Same Hard Drive in each case. USB 2.0 took 10 minutes to copy the 1.5GB Zip of Music to the external. Firewire 400 took around 5 minutes and Firewire 800 3 minutes.

    Like goobimama stated, go with Firewire 400 unless you are going to be working with Video Editing of LARGE video files. USB 2.0 is fine for a small external drive to copy a few files, but if you want speed to backup a lot of files, Firewire is the way to go.

  4. #4
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800
    Stetwin's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 08, 2007
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by goobimama View Post
    I would say use a FW400 drive. Firewire 800 is only for high speed video editing and it also needs a drive fast enough to cope up with those speeds. For your purposes, a Firewire400 drive is perfect. Even USB is fine, but it will take up a USB port on your machine which you would need for some other device.
    After having a shop about I can still only find the MyBook FW400 USB2.0 for 」70 excluding delivery, but I知 able to get the FW800 FW400 USB2.0 for 」78 delivered before I take the plunge does anyone know where I might be able to get one a little bit cheaper (links would be awesome), also are there any other external hard drives I should take in to consideration?

  5. #5
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800

    Member Since
    Apr 28, 2006
    Posts
    2,542
    Specs:
    iMac Core Duo 20", iBook G4, iPhone 8GB :)
    I'd say more the merrier since the price difference is small. FW800 is definitely faster and who knows. One day you might want to go into video editing.

  6. #6
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800
    Stetwin's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 08, 2007
    Posts
    95
    So is anyone able to help on the price or is 」78 delivered for the FW800 one very reasonable, also on a side not I can get the FW400 one for 」65 New and 」56 used (all prices are on Amazon.co.uk), obviously the 」56 one is a good saving but would a used drive be worth it?

  7. #7
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800

    Member Since
    Apr 28, 2006
    Posts
    2,542
    Specs:
    iMac Core Duo 20", iBook G4, iPhone 8GB :)
    You never know where a used drive has been...

  8. #8
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800
    mac57's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 29, 2006
    Location
    St. Somewhere
    Posts
    4,560
    Specs:
    iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, 256 GB SSD, 2 TB HDD, 8 GB RAM
    I have a GTech G-Drive, FW-400. Per the above posters, in real world work, it far exceeds the transfer rates of my USB2.0 hard drive. Now the G-Drive is newer, and that may be a factor, but still, the FW-400 interface screams along beautifully.

    I use PathFinder as a "heavy duty" file manager and its file transfer dialog shows the real time transfer rate as it writes to the drive. On large files, where my Mac is just pouring data onto the drives (big MP3s, movies and the like) the interface runs as up to 33 MB/s, or approximately 330 Mbps. By comparison, my USB2.0 drive runs in the 10-15 MB/s range.

    I realize that theoretically, FW-400 should go a bit faster, but this is the real world, not the theoretical world, and at the above rates, I can back up my full 50 GB or so of personal data (iTunes, movies, extensive digital photo collection) in about half an hour. It is excellent, and because it is so fast, I do it more often. If it was slower and more of a problem, I would do it less.

    I would recommend FW-400. FW-800, if not a huge premium, is a nice add, but I read that in real world tests, it isn't THAT much faster.
    My Macs: iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, Mac Pro 3.2 GHz, PowerMac G5 Quad 2.5 GHz, G4 Cube with 1.2 GHz Upgrade
    My iStuff: 64GB iPhone 5, 64GB iPad4, 30GB iPod Video, 16GB iPod Touch
    My OS': Mac OS X Lion, Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Mac OS X Tiger, Mac OS 9.2.2, openSUSE 10.3
    I was on the Mac-Forums honor roll for September 2007

  9. #9
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800
    Levi's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 06, 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    681
    Specs:
    MBP : 2.4GHz : 2GB RAM : 256MB VRAM : 160GB HDD
    If you're not bothered about the extra few quid get the FW800. That port is just going to sit unused otherwise, and it is the fastest.
    Koalas: The mafia of the animal kingdom.

    Now Powered By Leopard.

  10. #10
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800
    shahvikram123's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 16, 2006
    Location
    UK, London
    Posts
    637
    Specs:
    13 inch Macbook Pro Retina, 2.7ghz, 128gb SSD
    If your going to buy a FW800 HD then make sure you have a FW800 port, because the macbook only has a FW400 port

  11. #11
    USB 2.0 Vs FW 400 Vs FW 800

    Member Since
    Apr 28, 2006
    Posts
    2,542
    Specs:
    iMac Core Duo 20", iBook G4, iPhone 8GB :)
    Yeah. And they are not compatible with each other (though the FW800 drive will most probably have all the three formats). It will save some money though..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. firewire 400 vs 800
    By halfmonkey in forum Other Hardware and Peripherals
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-03-2011, 04:45 PM
  2. Firewire 800 to 400 Possible?
    By kitster79 in forum Other Hardware and Peripherals
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-06-2011, 02:25 AM
  3. 400/800 firewire
    By WRG in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-08-2010, 10:27 AM
  4. WD Passport Help? FW 800 to 400 + USB Cable
    By bennjiboi in forum Other Hardware and Peripherals
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-12-2009, 09:01 PM
  5. Can I use F/W 400 and 800 at same time?
    By travisw in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-06-2008, 07:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •