Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: 700mhz Mac?

  1. #1

    Dean786's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 16, 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    84
    Specs:
    iMac 17" 1.8GHz C2D iSight 1GB RAM 160GB HDD
    700mhz Mac?
    Hey..

    I hear some people have 300mhz, 500mhz, 700mhz Macintosh's...

    Im like.. How can you run a computer on such low CPU?


    Amazing. lol

  2. #2

    tandaina's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 12, 2007
    Posts
    57
    Right... You know I used to run a 100MHz computer. It ran WINDOWS. You may not believe this young whipper snapper but it ran GAMES as well. Yes, that's right, it could play games. Actually it could do everything a modern machine can do with a bit less "bling".
    Always be wary of any helpful item that weighs less than its operating manual. - Terry Pratchett
    http://snowonroses.blogspot.com/

  3. #3

    Stretch's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 13, 2007
    Location
    Central New York
    Posts
    4,773
    Specs:
    15in i7 MacBook Pro, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD, 500GB HD
    Macs processors are built differently that x86 processors, until Macs moved to Intel processors.

    Just like a 2ghz AMD is different than a 2GHZ P4. They are built differently. We used a 350MHz iMac up until two years ago when we replaced it with a new iMac.
    Blog and Photo Gallery: http://philolin.me/

    Currently running OS X 10.10

  4. #4


    Member Since
    Mar 20, 2006
    Location
    Petaluma, CA
    Posts
    573
    Specs:
    20" iMac 2.0 GHz Intel Core Duo, 12" iBook G4 1.07 GHz
    I'm scared for the future of the world.

  5. #5

    Dean786's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 16, 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    84
    Specs:
    iMac 17" 1.8GHz C2D iSight 1GB RAM 160GB HDD
    My friend has a G3 300mhz and Im just like how the omg can you live with that?

    Is it faster on a mac or somthing?

  6. #6
    MacHeadCase
    Guest
    I had to use my iMac 800MHz G4 before Xmas for typing practice and I could still use it for everything today. My iMac G5 is just faster but the G4 is still very much usable.

  7. #7

    Stretch's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 13, 2007
    Location
    Central New York
    Posts
    4,773
    Specs:
    15in i7 MacBook Pro, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD, 500GB HD
    You can't compare clockspeeds for two different types of processors. Its like compare miles per hour with kilometers per hour. They are completely different.
    Blog and Photo Gallery: http://philolin.me/

    Currently running OS X 10.10

  8. #8

    coach_z's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 23, 2004
    Location
    North NJ
    Posts
    3,169
    Specs:
    i dont have no mac's
    like stated already a few times, that 700mhz mac you are talking about is built on the PowerPC Architecture which is completely different than x86 technology. it processes information completely differently a lot faster than you'd think....

    there was a basic rule of thumb floating around for years....too bad this rule of thumb was basically wrong but it gave a decent ballpark. to get the x86 equivalent of a ppc processor i believe you multiplied the PPC processor speed x 1.5 so, 700mhz x 1.5 = about a 1ghz processor....now this is not a good way to compare the processors but it gives a ballpark and helps explain further that the ppc processors are faster than they appear
    -chris
    MoTM honor roll...
    when?
    i dont remember

  9. #9

    IceCreamMan's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location
    Lancaster PA
    Posts
    194
    Specs:
    G3 iMac 400Mhz, 512Mb RAM,10GB HDD
    Yea, my 400Mhz doesn't run to shabby with OS X... It's only frustrating when your in a rush.

    Owner of a '89 Mk2 Jetta
    Can't forget those G3 iMacs!

  10. #10

    mac57's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 29, 2006
    Location
    St. Somewhere
    Posts
    4,560
    Specs:
    iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, 256 GB SSD, 2 TB HDD, 8 GB RAM
    My first computer was a 66 MHz 486DX2, and it ran Windows just fine. In fact, people were asking me at the time why I wanted such a POWERFUL machine!! :dive:

    Its all relative!

    I still have a 450 MHz Pentium machine, and it runs both Windows 98 and VectorLinux 5.1 wonderfully.

    So, lower clock rates don't spell "worthless" - it is all a matter of what you are running on it.
    My Macs: iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, Mac Pro 3.2 GHz, PowerMac G5 Quad 2.5 GHz, G4 Cube with 1.2 GHz Upgrade
    My iStuff: 64GB iPhone 5, 64GB iPad4, 30GB iPod Video, 16GB iPod Touch
    My OS': Mac OS X Lion, Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Mac OS X Tiger, Mac OS 9.2.2, openSUSE 10.3
    I was on the Mac-Forums honor roll for September 2007

  11. #11

    Alexis's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 20, 2006
    Posts
    2,255
    Specs:
    Al iMac 20" 2.4Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo
    I still don't know why Windows Vista requires such hefty hardware. It's WinXP with transparent title bars.

    Which leaves the 'Flip 3D feature', which is Expose but in 3D (except you have to scroll through like a merry go round instead of just choosing your program straight away). Tilting a screenshot of an open application really shouldn't take that much horsepower!

  12. #12

    Kash's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 03, 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    9,385
    Specs:
    Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G
    Quote Originally Posted by dohidied View Post
    I'm scared for the future of the world.
    Ditto. Kids these days....

    I still remember my 486 days with a 66MHz processor. When we upgraded to a 450MHz Pentium II a couple years later, it blew the 486 out of the water. But you know what? The 486 ran Windows 98 without a problem. Trying running Vista on a computer that's 3 years old and runs XP :bomb:

    June 2007
    July 2009

  13. #13

    dtravis7's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 04, 2005
    Location
    Modesto, Ca.
    Posts
    29,052
    Specs:
    iMac 2010 27" QuadI7 OS10.12, iMac 2008 OSX10.11, MBP Late2011OS10.12 , iPad Air, iPhone 3GS
    Quote Originally Posted by Kash View Post
    Ditto. Kids these days....

    I still remember my 486 days with a 66MHz processor. When we upgraded to a 450MHz Pentium II a couple years later, it blew the 486 out of the water. But you know what? The 486 ran Windows 98 without a problem. Trying running Vista on a computer that's 3 years old and runs XP :bomb:

    Agreed! :spook:

    I ran 98SE on a 486/66 and later 486 DX4/100 and know what you mean.

  14. #14


    Member Since
    Feb 17, 2007
    Location
    Rotherham, Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    40
    Specs:
    Alu MacBook Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz, 2GB DDR3, 160 + 320GB HDD, Gforce 9400m - iPhone 8GB 2.2 T-Mobile
    Ha Ha, best comment I've read in ages. How old is this kid? My first PC had an Intel 60MHZ processor with (get ready to be blown away) 8MB RAM and a massive 500MB hard disk, oh and not forgetting my warp speed 4x Cd-rom. Cutting edge stuff. Ha ha.

  15. #15

    iBeldar's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 11, 2006
    Location
    Douglasville, GA
    Posts
    336
    Specs:
    '11 Macbook Pro i5 2.3 GHZ, 4GB, 10.10.4
    My 500MHZ G3 iBook runs OSX Panther just fine. Im waiting on my Digital Audio to come in though. Then upgrade it..

    Yah
    - Richard

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. iMac G4 700mhz
    By NewTo Mac68 in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-05-2009, 01:19 PM
  2. Emac 700mhz wireless??
    By jbauerctu in forum Internet, Networking, and Wireless
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-06-2005, 11:54 AM
  3. g3 imac 700mhz...
    By Macman in forum Schweb's Lounge
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-01-2005, 03:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •