| Switcher Hangout The place for switchers to discuss their new machines, and how to work with OS X. General support can be had here for newbie stuff, like "How do I restart my new iMac?" :) |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
|
|
Thread Tools |
![]() Member Since: Feb 27, 2007
Posts: 3
![]() |
Over the last few months I have used XP, Vista, and Ubuntu and then have come back home to Mac. About a year ago I sold my 12" PowerBook and got a windows laptop. That experience did not go well. The laptop was made by Acer and that led to some issues in and of itself. So on Thursday I went and got my new MBP 15" with 2 gigs of ram. I have to say it is good to be home.
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Sep 13, 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas!
Posts: 3,557
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: Mac's
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Apr 29, 2006
Location: St. Somewhere
Posts: 4,547
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: PowerMac G5 Quad, 2.5 GHz, 4 Core, 120 GB SSD, 500 GB HDD
|
My Macs: PowerMac G5 Quad, 2.5 GHz, 4 Core, Mac Pro, 3.2 GHz 8 Core, Power Macintosh 7500/100 My iStuff: 32 GB iPhone 4, 30 GB iPod Video, 16 GB iPod Touch My OS': Mac OS X Tiger, Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Mac OS X Leopard, Mac OS 8.6, openSUSE 10.3, Win XP I was on the Mac-Forums honor roll for September 2007 |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: May 20, 2005
Location: New York / Oklahoma
Posts: 205
![]() |
Richard iPhone Powerbook 15 Powerbook 17 |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jun 02, 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 328
![]() Mac Specs: White MacBook, 2.0 ghz Intel Core 2, 2GB ram||[G4 Imac Flat Panel] |800mhz|1Gb RAM|60gb HDD
|
I second that. I spent some time with Ubuntu but the wireless driver issues caused me enough trouble to give up on it. I run it now through Parallels every now and then when I want to play. Ubuntu has brought Linux light years into the future.
White MacBook, 2.0 ghz Intel Core 2, 2GB ram||[G4 iMac Flat Panel] |800mhz|1Gb RAM|60gb HDD|Combo Drive http://jonnyfive.tumblr.com/ |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Wireless problems is what made me give up on it also, then I switched to Mac, I like to check out Linux every once in a while though to see how it's coming along.
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 15, 2006
Posts: 534
![]() Mac Specs: Mac Pro 2.66GHz Quad, 1GB RAM
|
Join the Mac-forums folding team By Clicking Here |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Dec 20, 2006
Location: Middletown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 25,917
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 256GB Crucial M4 SSD
|
Quote:
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Jan 20, 2007
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 152
![]() Mac Specs: MacBook 2.0GHz, 2GB RAM, 120GB HDD
|
I had an Acer laptop once. I left it to charge over night as the batt was low and I woke up the net morning to notice that the thing wouldn't turn on and th motherboard had blown. Tought me a big lesson about laptop chargers.
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Nov 10, 2006
Location: Leeds, England
Posts: 297
![]() Mac Specs: 17" Core Duo Macbook Pro
|
I'd say Ubuntu / Kubuntu is the most advanced operating system out there, at least that I've used, including OS X. The problem is of course there's too much open source beta software and not enough commercial software available for it. If you factor that in OS X is king.
Acer really is third rate - they just feel like they could pack up at any minute. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Apr 29, 2006
Location: St. Somewhere
Posts: 4,547
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: PowerMac G5 Quad, 2.5 GHz, 4 Core, 120 GB SSD, 500 GB HDD
|
I think distros like U/K/buntu present Linux with an identity crisis, which may be good. Many, many Linux fans *like* the tinkering aspect of Linux - you get to configure the very guts of the OS to your liking. The downside is that you *have* to do this in most cases to get everything working. This has been the Linux "aura" for a long time. Along comes Ubuntu, and more or less, everything just works. It *is* standard Linux so you can go and tinker if you want, but you don't need to. Who is the target audience? Not hard core Linux users - they want more control. It has to be the world's Microsoft users. This is an excellent open source OS that will compete head to head with Windows. So, IMHO, Ubuntu isn't "classic" Linux any more - it is Linux attempting to broaden its appeal and reach out well beyond the normal group of people who would be interested in Linux. Is this good or bad? It depends on your point of view, although anything that impacts on the Microsoft hegemony is a good thing in my opinion. Some people in the Linux community are openly worried that Ubuntu Linux takes the Linux out of Linux, hence my "identity crisis" comment above.
Personally, I prefer the smaller boutique Linux distros. My favorite is Arch Linux, a performance optimized screamer that openly bills itself as Linux for the advanced Linux user. It is hard core, classic Linux. Pretty much nothing works out of the box. You have to configure and install just about everything - hence the "for the advanced user" billing. You need to have been kicking around core Linux for a while to use Arch successfully. But, there is a payoff. Arch is all about size and performance. You get all that Linux goodness in a screaming fast wrapper. It is small, fast and powerful. The combo of my Arch distro and my 3.0 GHz Pentium IV HT PC is the fastest computer I have ever used. I will honestly admit that if there had been a version of iTunes for Linux and a version of Photoshop for Linux, I would have never considered moving to Mac. It was only my reliance on those programs, necessitating the ongoing need to keep Windows around that got me thinking about Macs. Get a Mac and I could get rid of Windows. Originally, I was going to get a Mac and just use it for iTunes and Photoshop, continuing to "live" day to day in Linux... Of course then you realize that Macs are based on *nix, and you can combine the best of both worlds (free OSS and commercial softare, all in one tidy package). Then you learn about all that fabulous Mac OS X software and all the other goodies that are available. Well, the plan changed. I am really glad that I *did* consider Macs. Much as I hate to say it, since getting my Mac, my trusty old Arch Linux machine gets almost no use at all. It has been eclipsed in every way by my Mac. All part of growing up I guess! :dive: My Macs: PowerMac G5 Quad, 2.5 GHz, 4 Core, Mac Pro, 3.2 GHz 8 Core, Power Macintosh 7500/100 My iStuff: 32 GB iPhone 4, 30 GB iPod Video, 16 GB iPod Touch My OS': Mac OS X Tiger, Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Mac OS X Leopard, Mac OS 8.6, openSUSE 10.3, Win XP I was on the Mac-Forums honor roll for September 2007 Last edited by mac57; 02-28-2007 at 09:47 AM. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Feb 20, 2007
Posts: 37
![]() |
I agree with DrQuincy about Ubuntu being the most advanced OS. I also agree with mac57 in that OSX offers the best compromise. I would add that as a younger man with a lot more free time I loved "tinkering" with OSs. I remember having to replace my BIOS chip with a new one in order to load OS/2 2.0. I also messed with Slackware 1.x distros at that time. I have loaded many distros over the years but I no longer have the time to HAVE to configure every aspect of Linux. This is why I think Ubuntu is great. You have the ability to go to that level if you like but you don't have to. This also means that you can just load and use it but improve it when you have the time. The lack of an easy path to iTunes and Windows Media is the biggest downfall to Linux. The Windows Media can be done but it's not perfect.
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
| Thread Tools | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
|||||||
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 AM.
Powered by vBulletin