New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus • Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts • Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Switcher Hangout The place for switchers to discuss their new machines, and how to work with OS X. General support can be had here for newbie stuff, like "How do I restart my new iMac?" :)

Processor Speeds


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
gh11

 
Member Since: Apr 02, 2006
Posts: 51
gh11 is on a distinguished road

gh11 is offline
The fastest intel mac you can buy is the 2.16ghz mbp right now. My old laptop was 3.0ghz intel processor and it was not fast enough for me. How is apple charging so much for a paltry 2.16ghz processor computer? Does OSX use the speed differently or something i just cant understand spending 3 grand for a computer much slower than a much cheaper one.
QUOTE Thanks
newbalous5001

 
Member Since: Mar 25, 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 7
newbalous5001 is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 12" ibook g4 1.33ghz 512mb ram 40 gb hard drive

newbalous5001 is offline
The 2.16 ghz intel mac is a dual core processor. Your 3.0 ghz is not.
QUOTE Thanks
dohidied

 
Member Since: Mar 20, 2006
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 574
dohidied is a jewel in the roughdohidied is a jewel in the roughdohidied is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: 20" iMac 2.0 GHz Intel Core Duo, 12" iBook G4 1.07 GHz

dohidied is offline
out of curiosity, what were you doing that 3ghz wasn't fast enough for you?
QUOTE Thanks
gh11

 
Member Since: Apr 02, 2006
Posts: 51
gh11 is on a distinguished road

gh11 is offline
gaming and photoshop.
QUOTE Thanks
gh11

 
Member Since: Apr 02, 2006
Posts: 51
gh11 is on a distinguished road

gh11 is offline
dual core processors only run programs faster if the program is dual threaded. photoshop is i beleive, but most arent at this time.
QUOTE Thanks
baggss

 
baggss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 10, 2004
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 10,309
baggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" 3.4 Ghz i7 iMac-13" C2D Macbook-OSX 18.8.2-64Gb iPad 2-32 Gb iPhone 5-ATV 2-14Tb of Storage

baggss is offline
All Apple Apps that come on the Mac Intel boxes are designed to take advantage of the dual threading, including the OS. Many 3rd part Apps are moving there as more things go Universal Binary compliant. PS still runs under Emulation on the Intel boxes (Rosetta) so it may not take advantage of dual threading.

Also, keep in mind that speed is not the only or even the biggest factor in chip performance. Intel quit their "Ghz is everything" ad campaign when they started making slower Ghz chips that actually outperformed their higher Ghz chips.

What kind of chip was your 3.0Ghz, a P4?


QUOTE Thanks
lil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Photoshop won't run dual treaded via Rosetta as it only emulates a single G4 class PowerPC processor.

As Baggs says—there is much, much, much more to a computer's speed than just the central processor unit's clock rate.

And a Pentium 4m isn't exactly the world's greatest mobile chip.

It seems apparent to me at last that maybe the reason I don't find my G4s slow is because I'm patient, that or a lunatic *tongue firmly in cheek*

Vicky
QUOTE Thanks
D3v1L80Y

 
D3v1L80Y's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 02, 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 12,459
D3v1L80Y has a reputation beyond reputeD3v1L80Y has a reputation beyond reputeD3v1L80Y has a reputation beyond reputeD3v1L80Y has a reputation beyond reputeD3v1L80Y has a reputation beyond reputeD3v1L80Y has a reputation beyond reputeD3v1L80Y has a reputation beyond reputeD3v1L80Y has a reputation beyond reputeD3v1L80Y has a reputation beyond reputeD3v1L80Y has a reputation beyond reputeD3v1L80Y has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: MacBook

D3v1L80Y is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by lil

It seems apparent to me at last that maybe the reason I don't find my G4s slow is because I'm patient, that or a lunatic *tongue firmly in cheek*

Vicky
I wouldn't say 'patient' as much as I would call it just being realistic.
I have no idea why people complain about older G4's and G3's being "slow" when it comes to running Photoshop. I have never had a problem using it, or any app for that matter and I have never found it "slow".
Just because something doesn't happen instantaneously doesn't mean it is slow. I would really like to know what some of these folks are doing that they have to have Photoshop (or whatever app they are using) respond in .00002938778 seconds and render their results in half that time.
*shrug*

__________________________________________________
Posting and YOU|Forum Community Guidelines|The Apple Product Cycle|Forum Courtesy

mac: a waterproof raincoat made of rubberized fabric
MAC: a data communication protocol sub-layer, also known as the Media Access Control
Mac: a brand name which covers several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc.

QUOTE Thanks
Discerptor

 
Discerptor's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 02, 2005
Posts: 1,229
Discerptor is a name known to allDiscerptor is a name known to allDiscerptor is a name known to allDiscerptor is a name known to allDiscerptor is a name known to allDiscerptor is a name known to allDiscerptor is a name known to all
Mac Specs: 2.6GHz Core i7 15" MacBook Pro - 8GB DDR3 SDRAM - 750GB 7200 RPM HDD - GeForce 650M GT 1GB VRAM

Discerptor is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by gh11
The fastest intel mac you can buy is the 2.16ghz mbp right now. My old laptop was 3.0ghz intel processor and it was not fast enough for me. How is apple charging so much for a paltry 2.16ghz processor computer? Does OSX use the speed differently or something i just cant understand spending 3 grand for a computer much slower than a much cheaper one.
Please tell me you're not serious...
QUOTE Thanks
baggss

 
baggss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 10, 2004
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 10,309
baggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" 3.4 Ghz i7 iMac-13" C2D Macbook-OSX 18.8.2-64Gb iPad 2-32 Gb iPhone 5-ATV 2-14Tb of Storage

baggss is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by D3v1L80Y
I wouldn't say 'patient' as much as I would call it just being realistic.
I have no idea why people complain about older G4's and G3's being "slow" when it comes to running Photoshop. I have never had a problem using it, or any app for that matter and I have never found it "slow".
Just because something doesn't happen instantaneously doesn't mean it is slow. I would really like to know what some of these folks are doing that they have to have Photoshop (or whatever app they are using) respond in .00002938778 seconds and render their results in half that time.
*shrug*

This is all completely subjective and depends on what the user is used to. That being said, try rendering a graphic on a Quad G5 and then on a single G3, you will see a substantial difference and understand what they mean by "slow". Each user is different, you and lil may be satisfied with what your machines do for you, others would/might not be and desire more. Either way, there is no right or wrong answer or attitude here, it is all simply based on the desire of the user.

People expect results for their money, especially when it comes to computers, but the former Intel Ad campaign convinced millions of people (like the OP apparently) that speed in Mhz or Ghz was the most important thing in the world when buying a computer. Understanding why that isn't true is something that millions of folks can't, don't or won't understand, perhaps ever.


QUOTE Thanks
gh11

 
Member Since: Apr 02, 2006
Posts: 51
gh11 is on a distinguished road

gh11 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Discerptor
Please tell me you're not serious...
Why whats the big deal? I didnt know if osx's architecture used the power much more efficiently or something so I asked. My old laptop was an hp pavillion zd800 with a P4HT 3ghz processor. I recently sold it and built a beast of a desktop super tower. When I go to college I am concidering buying a laptop to take to college instead because this thing is the biggest computer ive ever seen and weighs 65lbs thanks to its all steel case. I was looking at the macbook, but for the hardware you get it seems overpriced. A macbook costs more than this computer I just built and it would outperform the **** out of a macbook. yes i do realize comparing a notebook with a tower is not a fair comparison but even so, the gap in power is quite large. For 1300 bucks I built a computer with 100gighdd, 2gig ram, AMD athlonX2 +3800 processor, and the most powerful ATI card available right now.
QUOTE Thanks
gh11

 
Member Since: Apr 02, 2006
Posts: 51
gh11 is on a distinguished road

gh11 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by baggss
This is all completely subjective and depends on what the user is used to. That being said, try rendering a graphic on a Quad G5 and then on a single G3, you will see a substantial difference and understand what they mean by "slow". Each user is different, you and lil may be satisfied with what your machines do for you, others would/might not be and desire more. Either way, there is no right or wrong answer or attitude here, it is all simply based on the desire of the user.

People expect results for their money, especially when it comes to computers, but the former Intel Ad campaign convinced millions of people (like the OP apparently) that speed in Mhz or Ghz was the most important thing in the world when buying a computer. Understanding why that isn't true is something that millions of folks can't, don't or won't understand, perhaps ever.
People compare in GHZ because its the closest thing we have to a standard that we can compare different CPU's with.
QUOTE Thanks
baggss

 
baggss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 10, 2004
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 10,309
baggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" 3.4 Ghz i7 iMac-13" C2D Macbook-OSX 18.8.2-64Gb iPad 2-32 Gb iPhone 5-ATV 2-14Tb of Storage

baggss is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by gh11
People compare in GHZ because its the closest thing we have to a standard that we can compare different CPU's with.

The problem with that is it's not a valid measure of actual power or performance and both Intel AND AMD recognize that. Right now the 2.16Ghz Core Duo is wiping the floor with your old P4 and Intels upcoming chips are only going to be better and are likely to give AMD a run for their money again.

As far as building your own, you will always be able to do so cheaper than buying one, no question about it. The power gap you're worried about is more or less only a perceived gap vice an actual one. Again, Intels Ad campaign brainwashed (the CPU makes the internet faster, right?) million and now they can't figure out what's going on.


QUOTE Thanks
sarahsboy18

 
sarahsboy18's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 30, 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,069
sarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nice
Mac Specs: Mac Pro, 8-Core 2.8Ghz, 10GB RAM, 2x1TB HDDs, iPod U2 Edition

sarahsboy18 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by baggss
The problem with that is it's not a valid measure of actual power or performance and both Intel AND AMD recognize that. Right now the 2.16Ghz Core Duo is wiping the floor with your old P4 and Intels upcoming chips are only going to be better and are likely to give AMD a run for their money again.

As far as building your own, you will always be able to do so cheaper than buying one, no question about it. The power gap you're worried about is more or less only a perceived gap vice an actual one. Again, Intel Ad campaign brainwashed million and now they can't figure out what's going on.
*puts on flame retardant suit*

And before the AMD guys get all riled up.... within a few years it will be the other way around again... It's a cycle.

"If you had a friend who was a tightrope walker, and you were walking down a sidewalk, and he fell, that would be completely unacceptable." -Mitch Hedberg
QUOTE Thanks
baggss

 
baggss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 10, 2004
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 10,309
baggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" 3.4 Ghz i7 iMac-13" C2D Macbook-OSX 18.8.2-64Gb iPad 2-32 Gb iPhone 5-ATV 2-14Tb of Storage

baggss is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by sarahsboy18
*puts on flame retardant suite*

And before the AMD guys get all riled up.... within a few years it will be the other way around again... It's a cycle.
Agreed, not trying to ping on AMD here so please don't take it that way.


QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« IP address | Getting a MacBook soon but.... »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?