New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Switcher Hangout The place for switchers to discuss their new machines, and how to work with OS X. General support can be had here for newbie stuff, like "How do I restart my new iMac?" :)

FireWire: Just Noticed Something


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
caveatipss
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Why do even the top of the line new iMacs have only 2 Firewire 400 ports, and no 800 ports? Even USB 2.0 is faster than FireWire 400. Why on earth would they do this?
QUOTE Thanks
surfwax95

 
surfwax95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 27, 2005
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Posts: 2,410
surfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: 15" Powerbook G4 24" iMac iPhone 3Gs

surfwax95 is offline
USB is only faster in short bursts. Firewire can hold it's 400mbps data transfer rate steadier than USB 2.0 can.

Firewire 800 is still a pretty new technology that not everyone is adapting to. It's very expensive, too.

I try to Command+Shift+/ when I can.
They're - Their - There | Two - Too - To | You're - Your | MAC - Mac
I was on the M-F honor roll for October, 2006.
QUOTE Thanks
caveatipss
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfwax95
USB is only faster in short bursts. Firewire can hold it's 400mbps data transfer rate steadier than USB 2.0 can.

Firewire 800 is still a pretty new technology that not everyone is adapting to. It's very expensive, too.
Ah ok. Thanks.
QUOTE Thanks
dimagex20

 
dimagex20's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 03, 2006
Posts: 202
dimagex20 is an unknown at this point
Mac Specs: iMac Intel Core Duo 17" A Little Piece Of Heaven

dimagex20 is offline
The 17" MacBookPro has it now.

It's all good.
QUOTE Thanks
kaidomac

 
Member Since: Jan 18, 2006
Posts: 1,868
kaidomac is just really nicekaidomac is just really nicekaidomac is just really nicekaidomac is just really nice
Mac Specs: G4 Cube

kaidomac is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfwax95
USB is only faster in short bursts. Firewire can hold it's 400mbps data transfer rate steadier than USB 2.0 can.

Firewire 800 is still a pretty new technology that not everyone is adapting to. It's very expensive, too.
Firewire is definately more steady than USB. I'll never buy another USB optical drive enclosure again. Also, there are a bazillion gadgets available for Firewire 400, plus you can daisy chain them! (connect one Firewire device to another rather than tying up all your ports to one device). Nearly every digital camcorder supports Firewire 400 too.
QUOTE Thanks
Avalon

 
Avalon's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 25, 2004
Location: Luxemburg, Europe
Posts: 1,779
Avalon is just really niceAvalon is just really niceAvalon is just really niceAvalon is just really nice
Mac Specs: PowerMac G5 Dual 2GHz (June 2004), 2.5GB, Airport, black 5G iPod 30GB, white MacBook 2.0 2GB

Avalon is offline
As it has been said already, FW400 is faster in average speed than USB2.0, especially if you connect several USB devices through a hub, the bandwidth reduces rapidly.
FW800 isn't very popular, and Apple decided to put it only on their Pro hardware.
You can find it on PowerMacs and PowerBooks (15" & 17"). Why Apple doesn't have it on the 15" MacBook Pro is a mistery though, as the 17" has it.
QUOTE Thanks
thelox714

 
thelox714's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 05, 2005
Posts: 205
thelox714 is on a distinguished road

thelox714 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimagex20
The 17" MacBookPro has it now.
and they charge you $2700 for the **** thing..

My Photo Site.
Other sites:
MySpace
My Blog.
QUOTE Thanks
macAttack

 
macAttack's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 23, 2005
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 1,509
macAttack is a jewel in the roughmacAttack is a jewel in the roughmacAttack is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: iBook

macAttack is offline
just a side note....the most expensive macbook pro 15 incher is 2700....and the 17 inch comes with all the features of it, and more....thats a weird pricing situation...
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Copying programs from the application folder? | Problem with Codecs for Macbook Pro »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wtf just happened..... iLEFTOVERCRACK Apple Notebooks 9 06-12-2008 03:26 AM
transfering directly pc to powerbook via firewire...possible? wrightm Switcher Hangout 11 08-08-2006 05:20 PM
Are Firewire hard drives powered through the firewire connection ? kevin-h Other Hardware and Peripherals 3 03-03-2006 06:31 PM
Firewire hub and stuff... Macman Other Hardware and Peripherals 4 12-27-2004 01:38 PM
external firewire HD wont mount! eceon Other Hardware and Peripherals 3 01-17-2004 10:57 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?