Page 1 of 20 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 294
  1. #1


    Member Since
    Dec 26, 2011
    Posts
    23
    Snow Leopard VS. Lion
    Hey all, new Mac user learning the ropes and having fun doing so.
    Thanks so much for all the help this far, everyone has helped to make this transition a very smooth one.

    I'm starting a thread curious about updating to Lion from my current Snow Leopard. What are everyone's thoughts on the updates? Should I do it? What are the main differences between the two? Will Snow Leopard soon loose support the way Microsoft phased out XP, etc.?

  2. #2


    Member Since
    Mar 09, 2011
    Posts
    751
    Specs:
    mbp 15 2009, mbp 13 2010
    Go for the Lion by all means, it is the most advanced OS human beings ever invented. It is far superior than SL, in my opinion. It is a matter of buying from
    apple store for $29 or so, it is worth it. Once you get the hang of Lion, you will never want to go back to older apple os.

  3. #3

    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,926
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    10.6 (Snow Leopard) will eventually lose support, but it probably won't be for another few years. Apple typically doesn't drop support until 2-3 major subsequent releases have come out.

    In my opinion, Lion is a gimicky train wreck of an update that tries to shoehorn a bunch of iPad/iOS-inspired user interface elements where they don't necessarily fit well. Some of the new features actually break existing functionality that had worked very well (Exposť for one example). In addition, other features are dropped entirely (Rosetta for older, PPC-based apps and Front Row support).

    Personally, if I could do it easily, I would just roll back to 10.6 and stay there until such a time when Apple releases a real update to OS X that actually improves things instead of adding a bunch of bloat and gimicky, grafted-on changes that make little sense.

    I'm certain others will feel differently, but for me, Lion hasn't been an upgrade... I've spent more time finding work arounds and "undoing" things that Apple has changed than actually using my computer, which is something I'm not accustomed to doing with Apple products.
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  4. #4

    harryb2448's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 28, 2007
    Location
    Nambucca Heads Australia
    Posts
    22,120
    Specs:
    Imac 27" Retina 5K, 512GB flash memory, 3.3GHz, 16GB memory, macOS Sierra beta.
    If you are using a MacBook etc kamerdoc 23 and decide to go with Lion, purchase and download, however prior to installing burn a copy to a USB thumb drive. M<any reports a clean install works much better than the upgrade, and this has generally been the case for the last six years or so.


    http://osxdaily.com/2011/07/08/make-...b-flash-drive/
    Hang on to those original install discs like grim death! Using OS X.7 or later make a bootable USB thumb drive before running Installer!

  5. #5


    Member Since
    Mar 09, 2011
    Posts
    751
    Specs:
    mbp 15 2009, mbp 13 2010
    All I can say is Apple new guards are following steve jobs mindset of forever reinventing computer technologies, putting best stuff in their products and never look back. For a newbie it is to learn the new ways and go forward.

  6. #6

    Discerptor's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 02, 2005
    Posts
    1,229
    Specs:
    2.6GHz Core i7 15" MacBook Pro - 8GB DDR3 SDRAM - 750GB 7200 RPM HDD - GeForce 650M GT 1GB VRAM
    Having used Lion and Snow Leopard side by side since a few weeks after Lion released, I can honestly say Lion is a step down from Snow Leopard in terms of reliability, usability, and resource efficiency. That said, you may not notice these shortcomings depending on how you use your Mac. I'll summarize the basic reasons for my assertions here for the sake of clarity:

    Reliability
    Every application that comes with Snow Leopard is stable and relatively bug-free. Lion, on the other hand, continues to plague a number of users with wireless connectivity issues and has the buggiest version of iCal that has ever been released. I have not personally experienced the wireless connectivity issue, but all the Macs at the office running Lion had to have BusyCal installed to be able to connect to our CalDAV server calendar, whereas the ones running Snow Leopard had no issue connecting via iCal.

    Usability
    Lion adds a lot of fluff, much of which is optional, and I am honestly fine with that - I'm not one of those blowhards that screams about Launchpad daring to exist even when I don't have to use it (and in fact I kind of like it). Mission Control, which replaces Exposť and Spaces, however, is an unmitigated disaster.

    Have several windows open in a few applications and want to see them all at once (say, Photoshop and InDesign)? Sorry, you can't do that in Lion because Mission Control chooses to immediately obscure any window with other windows from the same application with its window-grouping mess. Apple even tried to soften the blow here by allowing you to use the four-finger-spread gesture to slightly spread out the windows - guess what, it still leaves parts of the windows obscured.

    Want to drag that window from one space to another? Whereas you used to be able to very intuitively just click and drag while in Spaces view, now you have to first switch to the space where the window resides and then drag it to its destination.

    Want to fullscreen a movie to your external monitor while you work on something light on your laptop display? Nope, Lion took that away because with Apple's fabulous new fullscreen implementation, all monitors you might be working on aside from the one with the content is grayed out.

    Mission Control is a horrible implementation of what I'm sure were well-intentioned ideas that ends up being objectively less functional than what it replaced - as far as I can recall, this is the first OS X release to actually take away features. If Steve Jobs were alive, I imagine he'd give the team behind it a speech similar to the infamous one he gave the MobileMe team. Lion took a huge step backwards in multitasking workflows and window management.

    Resource Efficiency
    I'll be blunt here: Google any Benchmark comparison between Lion and Snow Leopard, and you'll see that Lion is either identical or a minor downgrade. This is the first version of OS X to ever achieve this. But given that benchmarks often don't reflect real-life usage, let's focus on that.

    Lion takes longer to both start up and shut down than Snow Leopard, thanks to the only mildly useful (and not very graceful unless you have an SSD) feature that restores your session upon startup.

    Lion uses a ridiculous amount of RAM compared to Snow Leopard - my coworker only uses her Mac mini for office tasks (spreadsheet, word processor, calendar, email) and the base 2GB of RAM wasn't enough to keep it from lagging. Let this sink in. Lion is so inefficient with RAM that many of the machines Apple is shipping it with are incapable of running it smoothly even when doing the least intensive of computer tasks. Sure, many people have more than 2GB of RAM anyway, but consider where this places your machine now. Suddenly 4GB is the amount of RAM you need for light multitasking and 8 GB is a "good" amount of RAM. Your performance is going to get shot in the foot with this upgrade unless you have 8GB or more of RAM. And all for a few shiny new features that mostly add more flash than substance or actually make the user experience worse.

    The one and only thing I can see someone upgrading to Lion for is the iCloud functionality that Apple refuses to put into Snow Leopard, assuming you own iOS devices.

    All in all, I strongly recommend against upgrading to Lion. Apple doesn't need any more dollars encouraging them to go in this direction with the OS. I can only hope 10.8 brings back what Lion took away.

  7. #7

    dtravis7's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 04, 2005
    Location
    Modesto, Ca.
    Posts
    28,938
    Specs:
    iMac 2010 27" QuadI7 OSX10.11, iMac 2008 OSX10.11, MBP Late2011OSX10.11 , iPad Air, iPhone 3GS
    Just wait till you see 10.8. You might go to Windows 8 with that horrible cell phone interface!

  8. #8

    Discerptor's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 02, 2005
    Posts
    1,229
    Specs:
    2.6GHz Core i7 15" MacBook Pro - 8GB DDR3 SDRAM - 750GB 7200 RPM HDD - GeForce 650M GT 1GB VRAM
    Oh, don't even get me started on Windows 8. It's as if the entire OS market is trying to push me towards obscure Linux distros. >.>

  9. #9

    dtravis7's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 04, 2005
    Location
    Modesto, Ca.
    Posts
    28,938
    Specs:
    iMac 2010 27" QuadI7 OSX10.11, iMac 2008 OSX10.11, MBP Late2011OSX10.11 , iPad Air, iPhone 3GS
    Even some of the more popular Linux distros like Ubuntu are doing things I am not happy with.

    Agreed on Windows 8. I tried to like it. I really did!

  10. #10

    robduckyworth's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 04, 2011
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    2,971
    Specs:
    15" MBP, 2.5GHz i7, 750GB, 6770M 1GB, iPad 3, iPhone 4, custom PC
    Quote Originally Posted by dtravis7 View Post
    Even some of the more popular Linux distros like Ubuntu are doing things I am not happy with.

    Agreed on Windows 8. I tried to like it. I really did!
    i never did release my video review of Windows 8... haha.

    I actually rather liked it. about time they changed it up a bit. though basically attaching a front end to Windows 7 probably wasnt the most tactile way they could have done it...
    If you find a post helpful, don't forget to use the reputation system (top right of post.)
    Join us in the IRC! How? Add me on Steam, Origin or PSN (Vita): robduckyworth

  11. #11


    Member Since
    Dec 26, 2011
    Posts
    23
    Thanks for all the information. I'm a pretty casual user and don't use much more than basics, so I think I'll hold off on the update for a little while. Everything is working so smoothly right now I don't think I want to take a chance of ruining a good start.

    Much appreciated everyone...

  12. #12

    Ghost Rider's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 14, 2011
    Posts
    231
    Specs:
    Imac 21.5 2011 Stock with Time Capsule. Ipad2 Colecovision
    I have started out with Lion. It came with my 2011 IMac.

    No issues to speak of. First time my computer woke up from sleep it was all beachballs and I hard to do a restart and no issues since then.
    I do like the logo better for Snow Leopard and that is my wallpaper

  13. #13


    Member Since
    Jan 22, 2010
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    20,911
    Specs:
    Mid-2012 MBP (16GB, 1TB HD), Monoprice 24-inch second monitor, iPhone 5s 32GB, iPad Air 2 64GB
    I've been running Lion without any significant issues since day one, and in particular I **strongly** dispute discerptor's claim that it's slower than SL. Quite the opposite in my experience, particularly with Safari.

  14. #14

    vansmith's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 19, 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    19,782
    Specs:
    2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)
    Quote Originally Posted by robduckyworth View Post
    i never did release my video review of Windows 8... haha.
    Yes, we're still anticipating this video. The wait is killing me!

    I agree with you Discerptor about the speed/efficiency. While SL was nice and nimble, some of the changes made in Lion have done little but slow down my machine. It's making my already aging MacBook look even older. While it's still very much usable, it's not as quick as it was with SL. However, I still think it was a worthy upgrade if only for the sake of future proofing a machine.
    Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
    M-F Blog :: Write for the blog
    Writing a Quality Post

  15. #15

    chscag's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 23, 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    48,849
    Specs:
    Late 2013 27" iMac, iPad 3, iPhone 6s+, iPhone 6+, 3 iPods, El Capitan
    I have to agree with Van. I have also noticed the slow down on my 2008 MacBook after upgrading to Lion, however, the 2011 iMac seems just as fast. Van also makes a good point about future proofing.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Upgrading to Mountain Lion, downgrading lion & snow leopard?
    By budcarl in forum OS X - Apps and Games
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-07-2012, 12:38 AM
  2. Snow leopard to Lion
    By jordan572 in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-29-2012, 02:48 PM
  3. Snow Leopard or Lion?
    By The-Canuckster in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 05-14-2012, 10:18 AM
  4. Lion vs Snow Leopard
    By Gemless Ear in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-06-2012, 03:39 AM
  5. Snow Leopard to Lion or Mountain Lion?
    By billwill in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-09-2012, 12:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •