New To Mac-Forums? |
Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us! Join today! • Get your questions answered by community gurus • Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts • Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals |
| Switcher Hangout The place for switchers to discuss their new machines, and how to work with OS X. General support can be had here for newbie stuff, like "How do I restart my new iMac?" :) |
| Thread Tools |
![]() Member Since: Nov 28, 2007
Location: Nambucca Heads Australia
Posts: 11,977
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: Quad Core, OWC Mercury Electra SSD. 22" BenQ LED display.
|
If you are using a MacBook etc kamerdoc 23 and decide to go with Lion, purchase and download, however prior to installing burn a copy to a USB thumb drive. M<any reports a clean install works much better than the upgrade, and this has generally been the case for the last six years or so.
http://osxdaily.com/2011/07/08/make-...b-flash-drive/ Hang on to those original install discs like grim death! |
|
|
![]() Member Since: Aug 02, 2005
Posts: 1,180
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2.5GHz Core2 Duo 17" MacBook Pro - 4GB DDR2 SDRAM - 500GB 7200 RPM HDD - GeForce 8600M GT 512MB VRAM
|
Having used Lion and Snow Leopard side by side since a few weeks after Lion released, I can honestly say Lion is a step down from Snow Leopard in terms of reliability, usability, and resource efficiency. That said, you may not notice these shortcomings depending on how you use your Mac. I'll summarize the basic reasons for my assertions here for the sake of clarity:
Reliability Every application that comes with Snow Leopard is stable and relatively bug-free. Lion, on the other hand, continues to plague a number of users with wireless connectivity issues and has the buggiest version of iCal that has ever been released. I have not personally experienced the wireless connectivity issue, but all the Macs at the office running Lion had to have BusyCal installed to be able to connect to our CalDAV server calendar, whereas the ones running Snow Leopard had no issue connecting via iCal. Usability Lion adds a lot of fluff, much of which is optional, and I am honestly fine with that - I'm not one of those blowhards that screams about Launchpad daring to exist even when I don't have to use it (and in fact I kind of like it). Mission Control, which replaces Exposé and Spaces, however, is an unmitigated disaster. Have several windows open in a few applications and want to see them all at once (say, Photoshop and InDesign)? Sorry, you can't do that in Lion because Mission Control chooses to immediately obscure any window with other windows from the same application with its window-grouping mess. Apple even tried to soften the blow here by allowing you to use the four-finger-spread gesture to slightly spread out the windows - guess what, it still leaves parts of the windows obscured. Want to drag that window from one space to another? Whereas you used to be able to very intuitively just click and drag while in Spaces view, now you have to first switch to the space where the window resides and then drag it to its destination. Want to fullscreen a movie to your external monitor while you work on something light on your laptop display? Nope, Lion took that away because with Apple's fabulous new fullscreen implementation, all monitors you might be working on aside from the one with the content is grayed out. Mission Control is a horrible implementation of what I'm sure were well-intentioned ideas that ends up being objectively less functional than what it replaced - as far as I can recall, this is the first OS X release to actually take away features. If Steve Jobs were alive, I imagine he'd give the team behind it a speech similar to the infamous one he gave the MobileMe team. Lion took a huge step backwards in multitasking workflows and window management. Resource Efficiency I'll be blunt here: Google any Benchmark comparison between Lion and Snow Leopard, and you'll see that Lion is either identical or a minor downgrade. This is the first version of OS X to ever achieve this. But given that benchmarks often don't reflect real-life usage, let's focus on that. Lion takes longer to both start up and shut down than Snow Leopard, thanks to the only mildly useful (and not very graceful unless you have an SSD) feature that restores your session upon startup. Lion uses a ridiculous amount of RAM compared to Snow Leopard - my coworker only uses her Mac mini for office tasks (spreadsheet, word processor, calendar, email) and the base 2GB of RAM wasn't enough to keep it from lagging. Let this sink in. Lion is so inefficient with RAM that many of the machines Apple is shipping it with are incapable of running it smoothly even when doing the least intensive of computer tasks. Sure, many people have more than 2GB of RAM anyway, but consider where this places your machine now. Suddenly 4GB is the amount of RAM you need for light multitasking and 8 GB is a "good" amount of RAM. Your performance is going to get shot in the foot with this upgrade unless you have 8GB or more of RAM. And all for a few shiny new features that mostly add more flash than substance or actually make the user experience worse. The one and only thing I can see someone upgrading to Lion for is the iCloud functionality that Apple refuses to put into Snow Leopard, assuming you own iOS devices. All in all, I strongly recommend against upgrading to Lion. Apple doesn't need any more dollars encouraging them to go in this direction with the OS. I can only hope 10.8 brings back what Lion took away. Last edited by Discerptor; 12-31-2011 at 10:51 AM. Reason: CalDAV, not WebDAV... I really need to start proofreading these things. |
|
|
![]() Member Since: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca.
Posts: 23,704
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: iMac C2d 2.4Ghz, Mini C2d 2.16Ghz, MacBook C2d 2.1Ghz, iBookG4 1.33Ghz, iPhone 3gs, iPad 16GB WiFi
|
Just wait till you see 10.8. You might go to Windows 8 with that horrible cell phone interface!
...Dennis Mac-Forums Community Guidelines Dell GX270 SFF with Windows 7 32-Bit - Dell E510 with Windows 7 64-Bit & Windows 8 CP. |
|
|
![]() Member Since: Aug 02, 2005
Posts: 1,180
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2.5GHz Core2 Duo 17" MacBook Pro - 4GB DDR2 SDRAM - 500GB 7200 RPM HDD - GeForce 8600M GT 512MB VRAM
|
|
|
|
![]() Member Since: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca.
Posts: 23,704
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: iMac C2d 2.4Ghz, Mini C2d 2.16Ghz, MacBook C2d 2.1Ghz, iBookG4 1.33Ghz, iPhone 3gs, iPad 16GB WiFi
|
Even some of the more popular Linux distros like Ubuntu are doing things I am not happy with.
Agreed on Windows 8. I tried to like it. I really did!
...Dennis Mac-Forums Community Guidelines Dell GX270 SFF with Windows 7 32-Bit - Dell E510 with Windows 7 64-Bit & Windows 8 CP. |
|
|
![]() Member Since: Jan 04, 2011
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 2,892
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 15" MBP, 2.5GHz i7, 750GB, 6770M 1GB. PC- i5 2500k/4GB/6850/5TB, 60GB SSD
|
Quote:
I actually rather liked it. about time they changed it up a bit. though basically attaching a front end to Windows 7 probably wasnt the most tactile way they could have done it... If you find a post helpful, don't forget to use the reputation system (top right of post.) Join us in the IRC! How? Add me on Steam, Origin or PSN (Vita): robduckyworth |
|
|
||
![]() Member Since: Dec 26, 2011
Posts: 17
![]() |
Thanks for all the information. I'm a pretty casual user and don't use much more than basics, so I think I'll hold off on the update for a little while. Everything is working so smoothly right now I don't think I want to take a chance of ruining a good start.
Much appreciated everyone... |
|
|
![]() Member Since: Sep 14, 2011
Posts: 223
![]() Mac Specs: Imac 21.5 2011 Stock with Time Capsule. Ipad2 Colecovision
|
|
|
|
![]() Member Since: Jan 22, 2010
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 10,162
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2009 MacBook Pro, Black speakers, Black Benq second monitor, black iPhone 4, Black 2012 iPad, etc.
|
I've been running Lion without any significant issues since day one, and in particular I **strongly** dispute discerptor's claim that it's slower than SL. Quite the opposite in my experience, particularly with Safari.
|
|
|
![]() Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 11,663
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2.1C2D/4GB/320GB
|
Yes, we're still anticipating this video. The wait is killing me!
![]() I agree with you Discerptor about the speed/efficiency. While SL was nice and nimble, some of the changes made in Lion have done little but slow down my machine. It's making my already aging MacBook look even older. While it's still very much usable, it's not as quick as it was with SL. However, I still think it was a worthy upgrade if only for the sake of future proofing a machine. apartments columbia shuts the spectrum above a poorly surname. Its viewer excuses the banana opposite a dye. The borderline parrots another young temperature. Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped. M-F Blog :: Write for the blog :: M-F IRC Channel - Chats every Sunday at 8PM EST. |
|
|
![]() Member Since: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 24,724
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 21.5" iMac 2.5 GHz i5, MacBook 2.4 GHz, 4 Gb, Lion & SL, 3 iPods
|
I have to agree with Van. I have also noticed the slow down on my 2008 MacBook after upgrading to Lion, however, the 2011 iMac seems just as fast. Van also makes a good point about future proofing.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| switching from Lion to Snow leopard | derekleech | OS X - Operating System | 15 | 02-20-2012 05:34 PM |
| Installing Snow Leopard over Lion? | ismo | OS X - Operating System | 20 | 11-02-2011 12:05 PM |
| difference between snow leopard and lion (icloud) | maximillian93 | OS X - Operating System | 1 | 10-15-2011 07:56 PM |
| Snow Leopard vs Lion connection issues? | cynicalandbored | Internet, Networking, and Wireless | 1 | 08-12-2011 05:38 AM |
| How Do I Uninstall Snow Leopard? | c12susan | OS X - Operating System | 3 | 09-23-2009 10:44 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 AM.
Powered by vBulletin