New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Switcher Hangout The place for switchers to discuss their new machines, and how to work with OS X. General support can be had here for newbie stuff, like "How do I restart my new iMac?" :)

Choosing a Mac for a Financial firm?


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
Prise

 
Member Since: Mar 31, 2007
Posts: 81
Prise is on a distinguished road

Prise is offline
Hi there,

What are some of your views on using the Mac to run the computing needs of a financial services firm?

I'm not sure how much has changed, but since most programs written for financial firms are windows based, and certain functions and portals work exclusively with IE.

I'm not sure how much that has changed. I am aware of using either a dual boot or vmware fusion as an option to run those programs and web based portals requiring an IE protocol.

The question, I suppose, is it worth it to deal with? Or, in this case, I should just go with windows based systems, though I do use Macs predominantly for my personal use.

Thanks in advance!
QUOTE Thanks
chscag

 
chscag's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 38,457
chscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" iMac i5, 3.2 GHz, iPad 3, iPhone 5c, 3 iPods, OS X Mavericks

chscag is offline
I would stick with a Windows machine for the computing needs of a financial services firm. Since most of what you run is designed for Windows and IE, there's really no point in using a Mac and having to either dual boot or use Windows from a VM. It's not that the current Mac machines can't run Windows well, it's why make things difficult for yourself when the primary use of the machine will be in Windows.

You can always relax at home in front of your Mac. That's what I do.

Regards.
QUOTE Thanks
didymus

 
Member Since: Apr 23, 2009
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 191
didymus will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: Model Identifier: iMac9,1 Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor Speed: 2.66 GHz

didymus is offline
I'd go with chscag - there's no point in switching just for the sake of a change. Stick with what you know, possibly with an upgrade to Windows 7 which, by all accounts, is a better OS than Vista.
QUOTE Thanks
DarkestRitual

 
Member Since: Apr 09, 2009
Location: Ithaca NY
Posts: 2,073
DarkestRitual is just really niceDarkestRitual is just really niceDarkestRitual is just really niceDarkestRitual is just really nice
Mac Specs: 13 inch alMacBook 2GHz C2D 4G DDR3, 1.25GHz G4 eMac

DarkestRitual is offline
While I see your point, chsag, if he wants to switch to a Mac at work, why not? Less headaches, and stuff will run fine in a VM.
QUOTE Thanks
Prise

 
Member Since: Mar 31, 2007
Posts: 81
Prise is on a distinguished road

Prise is offline
Many thanks for the replies.

Yes, I agree with chscag's point that the dislocation of change from "switching" would be more trouble than it's worth especially if it runs the risk of interrupting the fluidity of business.

In my case, I'll be starting fresh. In other words, my proprietary computer from my prior firm has to remain. All I'd have to do is to port over files I've already saved on an external disk.

So, I'll have to buy "new" computers.

I'm awfully tempted to go with the Mac. Some of the cons for going with Macs are higher fixed cost, having to run some programs and protocols on either dual boot/vmware fusion/parrallels, and future expandability (if by some stroke of immense good fortune, the start up firm expands beyond my wildest dreams, windows based computers are better for a small to medium range enterprise network).

Emotionally, I'm tempted with going with the Mac.
QUOTE Thanks
louishen

 
louishen's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 22, 2007
Location: London
Posts: 8,934
louishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: Mac Mini Core i7 2012 | White 2009 MacBook 2 Ghz | 733 Mhz G4 Quicksilver

louishen is offline
Then emotionally its up to you. After all, the Mac is the only computer able to run OSX and Windows, so you have the flexibility.

Member of the Month September 2008 & August 2012 | Found advice useful? use the rep system
QUOTE Thanks
bobtomay

 
bobtomay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 22, 2006
Location: Texas, where else?
Posts: 24,993
bobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15" MBP 2.33 C2D 256 4GB, MBA 13" i7 1.8, MB 2.0 2GB, Nano 4th, 3GS, iPad 1

bobtomay is offline
As much as I like my Mac for personal computing, there is no way I could reasonably suggest that our company move to Macs in the office. We must use windows only software and necessary to our business web sites that are IE only along with hardware that requires serial connections which means serial to usb adapters.

For systems with those requirements and with software that does not require even middle of the road hardware, we can get a Dell and a 22-24" widescreen monitor that historically will last from 5-6 yrs and up to 9 years in the job it's been assigned for well under $800-$1,000. We just replaced our last Pentium 3 machine a month ago, and only due to a hard drive failure. Figured it was time instead of putting another drive in it.

I cannot be held responsible for the things that come out of my mouth.
In the Windows world, most everything folks don't understand is called a virus.
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Stopped Drinking the Kool-Aid | iMac g4 800 HELP »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mac Users Get More ISP Choices schweb Apple Rumors and Reports 1 03-06-2003 10:57 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?