Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    mr..nemo
    Guest
    Do hard drives run slow after time
    every windows pc ive ever had only lasts me about 2years, the only conclusion i can find is that its because i ram the hard drive with so much stuff, it this true? and can i prevent this with a mac by buying a bigger hard drive therfor putting less stress onto it?

  2. #2


    Member Since
    Oct 01, 2004
    Posts
    3,378
    Simply having files on your hard drive won't make your system run slower. The percentage the hard drive is full doesn't affect performance. The problem really is that when you installed apps on a PC, they almost all want to have install a little program that runs in the background, so as you install more programs you keep having more and more things running in the background which really slow you down. OS X disk management is a bit better than Windows in that you won't have to defragment ever.

  3. #3

    MAC-simus's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 08, 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    442
    Specs:
    2GHz C2D macbook
    thats true, but if you are still worried about the disk performance there are meny disk otimizers from alsoft. (in any case, OS X will optimize your disk after every install)

  4. #4
    Ex_PC_Puke
    Guest
    biggest issue is that the appa and data become fragmented -- need to defrag every few months or so

  5. #5

    Avid6eek's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 13, 2005
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    350
    How much data you have on a drive does have an effect on performance. Assuming you have your drive defragmented, If you only have 10% of your drive full, the read/write head does not have to move very far to fetch all your data. If your disk is full, the head must swipe across the entire disk to try to find the data. The less movement, the lower the average seek times, and the quieter the HD will run.
    Desktop Specs: Core 2 Quad Q6600@ 4.0Ghz | Asus P5E X38 Motherboard | 4GB PC8000 DDRII | EVGA GeForce 8800GTX | CL x-Fi Fatal1ty | 4 x Hitachi 73GB 15,000rpm SAS HDs (RAID 0) | Adaptec 3805 SAS Controller | Dual Sony 16X DVD-RWs | Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW 24" LCD | Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Speakers

  6. #6
    ocie
    Guest
    hard drive performance degrades as you fill it up. the affects become more pronounced at aroun 10% free, 90% used.

  7. #7
    mr..nemo
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Avid6eek
    How much data you have on a drive does have an effect on performance. Assuming you have your drive defragmented, If you only have 10% of your drive full, the read/write head does not have to move very far to fetch all your data. If your disk is full, the head must swipe across the entire disk to try to find the data. The less movement, the lower the average seek times, and the quieter the HD will run.

    So in theory if i have 2 hard drives, 160bg and 250gb both are full about 30% the 250gb will run faster.... and if i had a 400bg that will run even faster

  8. #8

    Avid6eek's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 13, 2005
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    350
    Yes, if they were the same drives from the same product line. There are other things that make performance differences as well such as spindle speed, catch, NCQ, and interface (SATA vs SATAII).
    Desktop Specs: Core 2 Quad Q6600@ 4.0Ghz | Asus P5E X38 Motherboard | 4GB PC8000 DDRII | EVGA GeForce 8800GTX | CL x-Fi Fatal1ty | 4 x Hitachi 73GB 15,000rpm SAS HDs (RAID 0) | Adaptec 3805 SAS Controller | Dual Sony 16X DVD-RWs | Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW 24" LCD | Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Speakers

  9. #9

    Mr Sprout's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 26, 2005
    Posts
    105
    if hard drives got slower with the more stuff you put on them then they wouldnt make such big hard drives! The problem with pc's is the start-up items that accumulate over the years and their general unreliability means files are damaged over the years making them even more unreliable.

    Macs are much better at managing hard drives, they use a better filesystem and have a better operating system. Disk defrags are constant and startup items are few, meaning the macs dont have the same problems as pc's

  10. #10
    Thud
    Guest
    The problem is that all those bits are heavy. Put enough megabytes on a hard drive, and the drive has to spin slower because of the extra weight. Too much data means that some bits will be flung off the drive platters, corrupting data. This is why drives are enclosed in those metal cases-- to prevent potential injury from flying bits. The 0's don't hurt as bad but the 1's are like little splinters.

  11. #11

    Avid6eek's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 13, 2005
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    350
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Sprout
    if hard drives got slower with the more stuff you put on them then they wouldnt make such big hard drives!
    A full 400GB HD would run at the same speed as a full 200GB as the read/write head must sweep the whole drive of both systems. As a HD fills up, it's performance does fall.

    Whether or not a feature such as constant disk management makes an OS better is an opinion. Those nice little features may be what causes OS X to be sluggish compared to WinXP....too many things going on in the background. I would much rather have control of what my system is doing, and how it does it. This of course is only my personal preference.
    Desktop Specs: Core 2 Quad Q6600@ 4.0Ghz | Asus P5E X38 Motherboard | 4GB PC8000 DDRII | EVGA GeForce 8800GTX | CL x-Fi Fatal1ty | 4 x Hitachi 73GB 15,000rpm SAS HDs (RAID 0) | Adaptec 3805 SAS Controller | Dual Sony 16X DVD-RWs | Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW 24" LCD | Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Speakers

  12. #12

    macEfan's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 01, 2004
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    1,112
    Specs:
    Powermac g4 400mhz, 10gb, 256mb ram, OS9
    Hard Drives mainly get slow because of too much stuff on them. The less free space, the slower the performance. U should defrag the drive as well as check for spyware.



    http://spybot.com

    ( spyware removal tool that works well)

  13. #13


    Member Since
    Apr 27, 2005
    Location
    Leamington Spa
    Posts
    135
    Specs:
    13.3 MacBook Air 1.7 i5 - also, Mac Mini and dead 12in iBook G4 (RIP)
    Quote Originally Posted by Thud
    The problem is that all those bits are heavy. Put enough megabytes on a hard drive, and the drive has to spin slower because of the extra weight. Too much data means that some bits will be flung off the drive platters, corrupting data. This is why drives are enclosed in those metal cases-- to prevent potential injury from flying bits. The 0's don't hurt as bad but the 1's are like little splinters.
    ****... is that why my laptop rattles when shaked VERY vigorously?

    I did notice the hard drive had packed up totally and, before fixing it with a hammer, thought that a **** good shake would work.

    I'd better put my 250GB back-up drive in a steel box, just in case... :-))

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Mac Pro 8 Core slow to lookup Hard Drives
    By Scott_Douglas in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-23-2009, 11:59 AM
  2. Time Machine back up all hard drives?
    By Dizzi45Z in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-20-2009, 01:44 PM
  3. Time Mahine and External Hard Drives
    By BluR930 in forum Switcher Hangout
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-19-2008, 07:05 PM
  4. Time machine and internal Hard drives.
    By L4yer_mk in forum Other Hardware and Peripherals
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-06-2008, 03:16 AM
  5. Time Machine + Hard drives
    By heinz1218 in forum Switcher Hangout
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-20-2008, 05:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •