Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1


    Member Since
    Nov 18, 2006
    Posts
    26
    Where does OSX go from here?
    I was reading an article on Mac history. Around the time of Mac OS 7 Apple started working on the new Mac OS which was called Copeland. It was going to add multitasking, memory pretection, etc, etc, to the Mac OS.

    It turns out they had all sorts of problems and the project was dealyed over and over. Then Windows 95 came out - it was pretty Mac like and offered most of the features that Apple said copland would have. Many Mac users started considering Windows for the first time.

    Apple was desperate and at one point even consderd buying Windows NT or Solaris and making it look Mac like - rather than create their own new operating system. As we all know they finally settled on what is now OS X.

    I see history repeating itself. Windows Vista is adding many OS X features to be equal to OS X and it has few neat ideas of its own *AND* MS is alreay working on their next operating system.

    So where does OS X go from here? Just keep adding new features or improvements? Or is there a possiblity of a quatum leap like the orginal Mac OS was.... maybe a new complete new OS, [like BeOS] that is made to handle video and audio, and isn't just a desktop concept for office work?

    A few things I would like to see in the next OS X: multiple desktops, the ability to run each program in its own screen resolution [like the Amiga], a built in ability to view most MS Office docs.

    And how about a replacement for the desktop concept finder? Maybe you would mouse over a "digital town" instead of the desktop...you would go the the civic/concert center for all Audio and Video files, and all realted programs would be there, so would all audio settings, and you would have a Offcie center, all office programs, documents and office settings would be there... this seems better than having audio files in one folder, an auido program elsewhere, and settings in another place. Oh, and each "place" could have its own screen resolution also.

    Other ideas?

  2. #2

    schweb's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 27, 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    13,190
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2
    Quote Originally Posted by roger31 View Post
    Apple was desperate and at one point even consderd buying Windows NT or Solaris and making it look Mac like - rather than create their own new operating system. As we all know they finally settled on what is now OS X.
    Essentially that's what they did. The bought NeXT and turned it into OS X (and also brought Steven Jobs back to Apple).

    A few things I would like to see in the next OS X: multiple desktops,
    That's coming in Leopard

    a built in ability to view most MS Office docs.
    That's more up to MS making their document spec completely transparent.
    schweb | community leader
    flickr » facebook » twitter » tumblr » google+ » about.me

    Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr


  3. #3


    Member Since
    Nov 18, 2006
    Posts
    26
    It is funny, in the early 90s Apple almost bought out another OS that was Unix based but dropped the idea at the last minute.

    So OS X is getting multiple desktops? Cool. and I am surprised Vista didn't add multiple desktops to Windows... probably didn't know what Apple was going to do...

  4. #4

    Sgt Beavis's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 18, 2006
    Posts
    285
    It should be noted that while MS is already working on their next OS (codename Vienna), they have been working on it since 2001 when it was originally called Blackcomb. Vienna/Blackcomb is a 100% total rewrite of the WindowsOS from the ground up. It isn't NT7, it is totally different. Because of delay after delay after delay Blackcomb was sidetracked and Longhorn was created so MS could bring something to market in a reasonable amount of time. Of course reasonable was supposed to have been 2004, not late 2006.

    Vienna still won't be ready until after 2010. Microsoft has left a huge opening by offering Vista. Leopard has a feature set that is going to put the screws to MS on the desktop. TimeMachine alone gives Leopard a big advantage over Vista.

  5. #5

    cazabam's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jun 06, 2006
    Posts
    1,153
    Specs:
    MacBook 2.0GHz White, 512MB RAM, 60GB HDD
    For the new features of Leopard, look here:

    http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/index.html

    The virtual desktops are handled by Spaces, although I have them on Tiger using DesktopManager. As for MS Office docs, I have OpenOffice and NeoOffice is coming along nicely

  6. #6

    Sgt Beavis's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 18, 2006
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by cazabam View Post
    For the new features of Leopard, look here:

    http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/index.html

    The virtual desktops are handled by Spaces, although I have them on Tiger using DesktopManager. As for MS Office docs, I have OpenOffice and NeoOffice is coming along nicely
    Yes, and MS is moving to an XML format that can be used by OpenOffice and other office apps. Several governments are forcing the issue saying they will no longer buy MSOffice if it isn't offered with an open format.

  7. #7

    PapaNoHair's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 18, 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,180
    Quote Originally Posted by cazabam View Post
    For the new features of Leopard, look here:

    http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/index.html

    The virtual desktops are handled by Spaces, although I have them on Tiger using DesktopManager. As for MS Office docs, I have OpenOffice and NeoOffice is coming along nicely
    Some great features. Anyone know if Leopard will run on a G4 PowerMac?

  8. #8


    Member Since
    Aug 12, 2005
    Posts
    107
    Yes it will. Leopard will support all Power PC machiens running a G4 or G5 processor. G3 processors are no longer supported.

  9. #9


    Member Since
    Nov 18, 2006
    Posts
    26
    Sgt: Yeah, what became Vista was just going to be a small revision until whitecomb or longhorn or whateve came later with major changes.

    What is timemachine?

  10. #10

    Aptmunich's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 09, 2004
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    9,073
    Specs:
    Aluminium Macbook 2.4 Ghz 4GB RAM, SSD 24" Samsung Display, iPhone 4, iPad 2
    http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/timemachine.html


    Instant seamless backups and versioning.

  11. #11

    baggss's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 10, 2004
    Location
    Margaritaville
    Posts
    10,326
    Specs:
    3.4 Ghz i7 27 in iMac (2012), 3.4 Ghz i7 MacBook Pro (2015), iPad Pro (2014), iPhone 6+
    Quote Originally Posted by roger31 View Post
    It is funny, in the early 90s Apple almost bought out another OS that was Unix based but dropped the idea at the last minute.
    Are you referring to Be? That was the other option instead of NeXT. Be was actually cheaper and probably a much better system (those that ever used Be will agree with me here) than NeXT, but Gasse overplayed his hand and lost. Apple paid more for NeXT and Jobs than the highest asking price for Be.


  12. #12

    schweb's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 27, 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    13,190
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2
    Quote Originally Posted by baggss View Post
    Are you referring to Be? That was the other option instead of NeXT. Be was actually cheaper and probably a much better system (those that ever used Be will agree with me here) than NeXT, but Gasse overplayed his hand and lost. Apple paid more for NeXT and Jobs than the highest asking price for Be.
    I agree, Be was an awesome system. I still have a Be t-shirt around here somewhere. I ran it exclusively for awhile on my machine, I think starting with 4.0.

    While NeXT may not have been as good and way overpriced, in the end I think it was the best move just because of the Steve Jobs Factor™. I think Apple's success is due more to Steve than to OS X itself. It's his personality and drive for perfection that makes Apple what it is.
    schweb | community leader
    flickr » facebook » twitter » tumblr » google+ » about.me

    Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr


  13. #13

    baggss's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 10, 2004
    Location
    Margaritaville
    Posts
    10,326
    Specs:
    3.4 Ghz i7 27 in iMac (2012), 3.4 Ghz i7 MacBook Pro (2015), iPad Pro (2014), iPhone 6+
    Quote Originally Posted by schweb View Post
    I agree, Be was an awesome system. I still have a Be t-shirt around here somewhere. I ran it exclusively for awhile on my machine, I think starting with 4.0.

    While NeXT may not have been as good and way overpriced, in the end I think it was the best move just because of the Steve Jobs Factor™. I think Apple's success is due more to Steve than to OS X itself. It's his personality and drive for perfection that makes Apple what it is.
    Ya, I would have to agree with that. Apple can't really put a price on having a guy like Steve running the place.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Can I delete Mac OSX partition for reinstall OSX again
    By jasonli in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-13-2011, 05:01 PM
  2. Running OSX within OSX - A Virtual Machine question...
    By Dubhead in forum Switcher Hangout
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-18-2008, 10:02 AM
  3. using iMac OSX discs to re-install OSX on MB or MBP
    By 4miler in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-20-2007, 02:48 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-28-2007, 03:45 PM
  5. XServe OSX Server Software Defaults to OSX
    By dygmy in forum Other Hardware and Peripherals
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-04-2004, 03:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •