Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    pigoo3's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 20, 2008
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    34,839
    Specs:
    2011 13" MBP 2.3ghz, 8gig ram, OS 10.8.5
    Resolution of Newer Electronic Devices Too Much??
    Here's an news article I thought some electronics technophiles might find interesting. It discusses how the higher & higher resolutions of newer electronic devices are exceeding the human eye's ability to perceive it...thus possibly...unnecessary:

    Enough pixels already! TVs, tablets, phones surpass limits of human vision, experts say.

    - Nick
    - Too many "beachballs", read this: Beachballs
    - Computer seems slower than it used to? Read this for some slow computer tips: Speedup
    - Almost full hard drive? Some solutions. Out of Space
    - Apple Battery Info. Battery

  2. #2

    chscag's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 23, 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    48,514
    Specs:
    Late 2013 27" iMac, iPad 3, iPhone 6s+, iPhone 6+, 3 iPods, El Capitan
    But Nick, think of how much my cat will enjoy her new 4K TV! I'm lucky with these old eyes I can the screen of my dumb phone.

  3. #3

    XJ-linux's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 02, 2007
    Location
    Going Galt...
    Posts
    3,450
    Specs:
    MacBookAir5,2:10.9.5-MacMini3,1:10.9.5-iPhone6,1:8.4.1
    My eyes probably can't tell the difference. My wallet would probably notice the difference between 1080 and 4k though. At a certain point, I don't care about resolution allowing me to see the newscasters' acne or read the serial number on a prop gun in an action movie.

  4. #4

    RadDave's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 20, 2012
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,283
    Specs:
    MBP 13" (2013); 8 GB RAM; SSD 256 GB; OS 10.11.5
    Hi Nick - boy, I agree - i.e. why go beyond what the human eye can even resolve? I'm happy w/ my current HDTV (about 2 y/o now) - I can't imagine being much happier even w/ the nearly 200 Blu-ray discs that I now own.

    Of course, this is analogous to audio claiming to 'hearing' above the frequency of human audibility (20-20,000 Hz ideally) - those higher frequencies are lost quickly as we age - I listen to a lot of classical music and the overtones (i.e. 2x or more the fundamental frequencies) are important in distinguishing the various instruments; BUT, some of these audio claims that presumably reproduce these overtones ABOVE 20K Hz are ridiculous statements, i.e. maybe dogs can hear them but not humans!

    Dave

  5. #5

    vansmith's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 19, 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    19,782
    Specs:
    2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)
    I think the better measure of quality in relation to the number of pixels is pixel density. I've held devices with decent resolutions but lower pixel densities and definitely seen a difference. My first tablet for instance had a ppi of 149 whereas my Nexus 5 has a ppi of 445 and it's obvious that the detail is much better.
    Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
    M-F Blog :: Write for the blog
    Writing a Quality Post

  6. #6

    pigoo3's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 20, 2008
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    34,839
    Specs:
    2011 13" MBP 2.3ghz, 8gig ram, OS 10.8.5
    Quote Originally Posted by vansmith View Post
    My first tablet for instance had a ppi of 149 whereas my Nexus 5 has a ppi of 445 and it's obvious that the detail is much better.
    I agree 100%. 445ppi should be noticeably better than 149ppi. But is there somewhere between 149ppi and 445ppi where the human eye cannot tell the difference...but we as consumers are paying bigger bucks for technology we cannot utilize (see the difference).

    Just throwing the thought out there. I don't claim to be an optical expert!

    - Nick
    - Too many "beachballs", read this: Beachballs
    - Computer seems slower than it used to? Read this for some slow computer tips: Speedup
    - Almost full hard drive? Some solutions. Out of Space
    - Apple Battery Info. Battery

  7. #7


    Member Since
    Dec 31, 2010
    Location
    Preston, Lancs, UK
    Posts
    498
    Specs:
    Mac Mini 2011 i5 2.3/8GB, MBPr 15 2013 with i7/16GB both running El Capitan
    This is where Apple gets its 'retina' designation - at typical viewing distance the pixels are small enough to be indistinguishable.

    The point of 4k is more to support the demand for ever-larger screens whilst keeping this level of granularity.

  8. #8

    bobtomay's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 22, 2006
    Location
    Texas, where else?
    Posts
    26,466
    Specs:
    15" MBP '06 2.33 C2D 4GB 10.7; 13" MBA '14 1.8 i7 8GB 10.11; 21" iMac '13 2.9 i5 8GB 10.11; 6S
    Panasonic's 4k tablet with a resolution of 3840x2650 and a 20" screen.

    Only price I could find - $6k - and it'll run 2 hrs on battery.
    I cannot be held responsible for the things that come out of my mouth.
    In the Windows world, most everything folks don't understand is called a virus.

  9. #9

    vansmith's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 19, 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    19,782
    Specs:
    2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)
    Quote Originally Posted by pigoo3 View Post
    I agree 100%. 445ppi should be noticeably better than 149ppi. But is there somewhere between 149ppi and 445ppi where the human eye cannot tell the difference...but we as consumers are paying bigger bucks for technology we cannot utilize (see the difference).

    Just throwing the thought out there. I don't claim to be an optical expert!

    - Nick
    You're certainly right - I've seen lower DPI screens and was unable to see any difference in clarity. Colour presentation however is a different story (I, like you, am not an optical expert so that's something we can leave to those who are).
    Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
    M-F Blog :: Write for the blog
    Writing a Quality Post

  10. #10

    CarpathiaMan's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 06, 2010
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    107
    Specs:
    Mac mini | Intel Core i5 | 8 GB RAM | 240 GB SSD | Dell 27" LCD | OS X 10.10.x
    Now the question is, can we get a retina display on a smart watch................?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 15" MBP Normal Resolution vs High Resolution
    By Thanatos42 in forum Switcher Hangout
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-09-2012, 01:48 PM
  2. Electronic Highlighter /Scanner
    By TheOneBillyX in forum Other Hardware and Peripherals
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-01-2010, 04:05 PM
  3. Electronic piano tone: where?
    By giapage in forum Music, Audio, and Podcasting
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-04-2009, 07:00 AM
  4. Making Electronic Beats
    By hurleyxandy in forum Music, Audio, and Podcasting
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-06-2007, 07:13 PM
  5. HELP!! - Need an electronic Calender
    By Brian Howlett in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-16-2004, 10:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •