New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus • Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts • Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Schweb's Lounge Forum for general conversation, chit chat, or most topics that don't fit in another forum.

In Praise of Apple's Low Taxes


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
Backlighting

 
Backlighting's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 05, 2012
Posts: 73
Backlighting is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Mac Mini: OSX 10.9.4 Mavericks, 8GB Ram, Samsung Series 5 SC570 monitor, Seagate external drive.

Backlighting is offline
By Edward Hudgins

May 24, 2013 -- Apple Inc. is under attack by politicians for “avoiding” paying $44 billion in American corporate taxes.

Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich) complained about tax “gimmicks” and Apple’s “unfair behavior,” saying “loopholes in our tax laws and regulations allow many companies … to shift enormous amounts of income from this country to other countries.” Making the whining bipartisan, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz) complained that Apple “is one of the largest corporate tax avoiders.”

But in fact it's the politicians who deserve condemnation, not Apple.

First, as Apple CEO Tim Cook pointed out in Congressional testimony, his company paid all the corporate taxes it legally owed—estimated to be around $6 billion. It broke no law.

Second, anyone with a proper sense of self-worth seeks to pay no more taxes than they legally owe. If that’s “tax avoidance,” everyone does it and should do it. What kind idiot would Cook be if he said to his shareholders “Gee guys, let’s fork over tens of billions more to the feds above and beyond what we’re required to do”?

Third, if Apple had shoveled more of its cash into the federal government’s insatiable maw, this would have meant some combination of higher prices for Apple consumers, less Apple investment in developing cool new products, lower prices for Apple stock (check your portfolio!), and less profits for the individuals who earned it. Note: none of those “earning it” are members of Congress.

Fourth, the huge, arcane, incomprehensible tax code is a political document. Every deduction is there because Congress put it into law, whether it’s for oil companies purchasing drilling equipment or Green consumers purchasing Chevy Volts. Yes, it’s a mess. But…

Fifth, the reason the tax code is a mess is that political power is the coin of the realm. Few companies can stay “above politics” and survive. They always must watch for competitors who try to use the tax code or regulations to screw them. So every interest group—every business—tries to influence Congress to get benefits or at least protections worked into the law—and the politicians oblige. The result is a tangled, corrupt, crony-capitalist mess.

Conclusion: Apple was not trying to screw anyone, just trying to use every legal means to keep from being looted.

Neither Apple nor any enterprise or individual needs to justify why they should keep their own money. The government must justify why it should take it away since the only legitimate purpose of government is to protect our lives, liberty and—yes!—property. Most government activities nowadays are by no rational standard authorized by the Constitution. Most tax money is spent by political elites who arrogantly presume to run our lives.

So let’s praise Apple both for being one of the world’s most productive companies and for keeping its tax bill low. And let’s condemn politicians who try to cripple the productive while demanding that the productive turn over more of the fruits of their productive efforts to politicians to be wasted.
QUOTE Thanks
chscag

 
chscag's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 41,425
chscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" iMac i5, 3.2 GHz, iPad 3, iPhone 5c, 3 iPods, Yosemite

chscag is offline
Then why doesn't Apple move lock, stock, and barrel out of California which is one the worst places in the US for high taxes, public waste, and deficit?

Quote:
So let’s praise Apple both for being one of the world’s most productive companies and for keeping its tax bill low. And let’s condemn politicians who try to cripple the productive while demanding that the productive turn over more of the fruits of their productive efforts to politicians to be wasted.
Let's not get carried away. Apple is no different than any other large corporation in the business of making money. And... politicians are what they are, politicians.
QUOTE Thanks
louishen

 
louishen's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 22, 2007
Location: London
Posts: 8,951
louishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant futurelouishen has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: Mac Mini Core i7 2012 | White 2009 MacBook 2 Ghz | 733 Mhz G4 Quicksilver

louishen is offline
Lets all move to countries with the lowest tax rates (% of GDP)

United Arab Emirates
Kuwait
Equatorial Guinea
Oman
Qatar
Libya
Chad
Bahrain
Burma
Saudi Arabia
Angola
Congo, Republic of
Iran
Nigeria
Sudan
Afghanistan
Yemen
Algeria
Central African Republic
Cambodia
Guinea
Bangladesh
Haiti

Oh hang on. lets not

Guess I'll have to continue paying taxes to enjoy political freedom, rule of law and a working infrastructure

Member of the Month September 2008 & August 2012 | Found advice useful? – use the rep system
QUOTE Thanks
Backlighting

 
Backlighting's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 05, 2012
Posts: 73
Backlighting is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Mac Mini: OSX 10.9.4 Mavericks, 8GB Ram, Samsung Series 5 SC570 monitor, Seagate external drive.

Backlighting is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by chscag View Post
Then why doesn't Apple move lock, stock, and barrel out of California which is one the worst places in the US for high taxes, public waste, and deficit?
Let's not get carried away. Apple is no different than any other large corporation in the business of making money. And... politicians are what they are, politicians.
Not that easy to just move a company as large as Apple. Who knows, perhaps they will.
QUOTE Thanks
Slydude

 
Slydude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 16, 2009
Location: North Louisiana, USA
Posts: 6,871
Slydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: 2.8 GHz MacBook Pro 10.8,3 8 GB mem, 2.66 GHz Mac Pro - Dead, iPhone 4

Slydude is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by louishen View Post

Guess I'll have to continue paying taxes to enjoy political freedom, rule of law and a working infrastructure
For me the problem is not in paying of taxes as much as the double standard associated with their collection and what they are collected on. Did the same people who complained about Apple complain as publicly about Microsoft, G.E. et al. who have used similar practices?

Sylvester Roque Former Contributing Editor About This Particular Macintosh

"Got Time to breathe. You got time for music." Denver Pyle as Briscoe Darling
QUOTE Thanks
vansmith

 
vansmith's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 18,352
vansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)

vansmith is offline
I'll bite.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlighting View Post
But in fact it's the politicians who deserve condemnation, not Apple.
Because Apple moved/kept massive amounts of money overseas with the explicit purposes of protecting it from taxation? Yeah, they did make use of loopholes. There's a reason they kept the money in Ireland specifically (source). Given that, of all the people, the politicians are to blame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlighting View Post
First, as Apple CEO Tim Cook pointed out in Congressional testimony, his company paid all the corporate taxes it legally owed—estimated to be around $6 billion. It broke no law.
Doesn't negate the fact that Apple did what it did. Did they break the law? No but that doesn't negate the fact that they're playing the system which is questionable and potentially reprehensible. Remember, you can separate moral judgment from legal ramifications.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlighting View Post
Second, anyone with a proper sense of self-worth seeks to pay no more taxes than they legally owe.
That's quite the broad and sweeping statement that unnecessarily ties perceptions of self-worth to financial solvency and unreasonably fervent protection of one's assets.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlighting View Post
If that’s “tax avoidance,” everyone does it and should do it.
Attempting to play the system and robbing the government of money benefits no one. A "let's keep our money from the government" was and continues to be devastating to a system that depends on taxation to fund public projects. Might people in certain places be taxed too much? Probably but that's besides the point. This garrison mentality when it comes to financial assets is nothing short of destructive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlighting View Post
Third, if Apple had shoveled more of its cash into the federal government’s insatiable maw, this would have meant some combination of higher prices for Apple consumers, less Apple investment in developing cool new products, lower prices for Apple stock (check your portfolio!), and less profits for the individuals who earned it.
That's fallacious logic at its finest. Apple has total control over its pricing structure and as-is, has one of the highest profit margins in the industry. Apple could easily take a hit to their profit margin, still invest heavily in R & D and design excellent products. This whole notion of "higher taxes means higher prices" is a joke. If that were the case, Americans would pay more for Apple products that Canadians since the U.S. has a higher corporate tax rate but that isn't the case (source). A more stark example would be Australia - a country whose corporate tax rate is 9% lower than the U.S. and a country that pays considerably higher prices for most electronics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlighting View Post
Fourth, the huge, arcane, incomprehensible tax code is a political document. Every deduction is there because Congress put it into law, whether it’s for oil companies purchasing drilling equipment or Green consumers purchasing Chevy Volts.
This whole problem with loopholes has to do with the Irish tax code, not the American. There's nothing wrong with companies holding assets overseas. Any attempt to do otherwise would seem to contradict the principles of the free market.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlighting View Post
Conclusion: Apple was not trying to screw anyone, just trying to use every legal means to keep from being looted.
Looted? You might want to look up what that word means.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlighting View Post
Neither Apple nor any enterprise or individual needs to justify why they should keep their own money. The government must justify why it should take it away since the only legitimate purpose of government is to protect our lives, liberty and—yes!—property.
Protection of the citizens is by no means free. Regardless, if that's the only purpose of government, I suppose it should stop building roads, building schools, funding scientific research, etc. since none of that has to do with protecting the individual.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlighting View Post
Most government activities nowadays are by no rational standard authorized by the Constitution.
That's not how a constitution works. Constitutions are designed specifically (in part) to outline what level of government does what (if the U.S. constitution is like any other which I presume it is).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlighting View Post
So let’s praise Apple both for being one of the world’s most productive companies and for keeping its tax bill low.
Regardless of whether or not this is problematic, I find it hard to believe that Apple deserves praise for this. Even if they did nothing wrong (which they probably didn't), why should I or any other non-investor praise Apple for protecting its assets?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlighting View Post
And let’s condemn politicians who try to cripple the productive while demanding that the productive turn over more of the fruits of their productive efforts to politicians to be wasted.
Again, you really seem to be leaning heavily on this rather sensational notion that taxation is an all or nothing game, that it's either severely crippling to the point of being authoritarian in nature or, without taxes, we'll all live free and the banalities of life (roads, schools, etc.) will somehow magically take care of themselves.

Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
M-F Blog :: Write for the blog
Writing a Quality Post
QUOTE Thanks
RavingMac

 
RavingMac's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 07, 2008
Location: In Denial
Posts: 7,664
RavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 4GB Mac Mini 2012, 13" MBA, 15" MacBook Pro OSX 10.7, 32 GB iPhone 3GS, iPad2 64gb 3G

RavingMac is offline
I won't get into the tax avoidance and Apple issue, but will weigh in with my 2 cents worth.

My opinion is that Apple should pay zero taxes, nothing, nada, not a dime. The same thing goes for every other corporation.

Why?
Because every penny that passes through the corporation is already taxed multiple times, sales tax on materials, products and services, income taxes on salaries, capital gains on investments. Give it a rest!

I am not anti-tax by any means, but corporate taxes make zero sense to me (and, no, I don't own, operate, or work for a corporation).

I've always wanted to be smart, handsome and modest. But, I guess I'll have to be satisfied with two out of three . . .
QUOTE Thanks
iggibar

 
iggibar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 20, 2009
Location: C-Town
Posts: 4,067
iggibar is a splendid one to beholdiggibar is a splendid one to beholdiggibar is a splendid one to beholdiggibar is a splendid one to beholdiggibar is a splendid one to beholdiggibar is a splendid one to beholdiggibar is a splendid one to beholdiggibar is a splendid one to behold
Mac Specs: Mac Pro 4.1 15" MBP. 13" MBP. 17" PB. Power Mac G5. Galaxy Note 4 160gb*

iggibar is offline
Apple did nothing illegal. They are the ones on the hot seat because everyone knows them. Blame a company for following your own tax laws?? Okay, then why is their list so short of companies who have done the exact same thing, or even worse? Where's G.E.? I bet GE has much more lobbyists...that's why.

Simply put, the current tax codes are in place for educated people and companies to use them for their benefit. If these people don't like it, get rid of our current tax codes. There's nothing complicated AT ALL about it! The only thing that complicates things are the stupid lobbyists who pay $$$$$ to get their way.

“If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself but to your own estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.” Marcus Aurelius
QUOTE Thanks
harryb2448

 
harryb2448's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 28, 2007
Location: Nambucca Heads Australia
Posts: 18,335
harryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: iMac i5 2.7GHz, 16GB memory, OS 10.10.1

harryb2448 is offline
Isn't that so typical of a politician for complaining about any companies following the rules legislators make?

Here in Australia Federal Election due 14 September. Opposition Treasurer has already been observed on TV saying 'It is not Australian citizens fault they are not paying sufficient taxes'. In other words brace yourselves if we get in!

Hang on to those original install discs like grim death! Using OS X.7 or later make a bootable USB thumb drive before running Installer!
QUOTE Thanks
chscag

 
chscag's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 41,425
chscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" iMac i5, 3.2 GHz, iPad 3, iPhone 5c, 3 iPods, Yosemite

chscag is offline
Quote:
Opposition Treasurer has already been observed on TV saying 'It is not Australian citizens fault they are not paying sufficient taxes'. In other words brace yourselves if we get in!
A very wise Ross Perot once said (when he was running for president) "Giving the government more money in taxes is like giving a drug addict more drugs"!
QUOTE Thanks
harryb2448

 
harryb2448's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 28, 2007
Location: Nambucca Heads Australia
Posts: 18,335
harryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: iMac i5 2.7GHz, 16GB memory, OS 10.10.1

harryb2448 is offline
True Charlie true!

Hang on to those original install discs like grim death! Using OS X.7 or later make a bootable USB thumb drive before running Installer!
QUOTE Thanks
XJ-linux

 
XJ-linux's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 02, 2007
Location: Going Galt...
Posts: 3,360
XJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: MacBookAir5,2:10.9.5-MacMini3,1:10.9.5-iPhone6,1:8.1

XJ-linux is offline
I have no problem with Apple following the law and paying only it's legal due in taxes. My only complaint is that I don't have the leverage to have a similar arsenal of exemptions, "loopholes" and "gimmics" in my existence as a non-corporate entity. Fair is fair...

I'm a business called "Paying Dave's Family's Way Though Life and Supporting in Part Those Who Pay Little or Nothing Into the Common Good for Whatever Reasons". I'd be happy if I could do some of the stuff any company can do to defer payments, depreciate assets and write off interest/value/etc on my car, home, computer, phone, cell phone, work clothes, yard service, trash pickup, guns, appliances, phone service, internet, blah, blah, blah... I use it all (at least in part) for the business of keeping keeping Me, Inc. running, ready, available, able and qualified to work. I bet I could make every year look like a financial loss on paper if I could use corporate accounting to account of everything it takes to keep the lights on around here. Fair is fair...

If Citizens United lets companies have some broad rights as "people" so to speak, then people should be able to have some of the broad rights as "companies" as well. Maybe enjoy some of those corporate benefits they lobbied for so hard can trickle down to me? It would certainly be nice to enjoy the benefits of citizenship when needed, while enjoying a certain amount of legal distance of responsibility when needed.

No problem with Apple of GE following the law. But, all citizens (corporate or private) should all get the same, or nothing when it comes to legal guarantees, protections or restrictions by a government.

"Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." – Henry Spencer
QUOTE Thanks
XJ-linux

 
XJ-linux's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 02, 2007
Location: Going Galt...
Posts: 3,360
XJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond reputeXJ-linux has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: MacBookAir5,2:10.9.5-MacMini3,1:10.9.5-iPhone6,1:8.1

XJ-linux is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by chscag View Post
A very wise Ross Perot once said (when he was running for president) "Giving the government more money in taxes is like giving a drug addict more drugs"!
Ross warned us about NAFTA as well, and yet both R & D alike seem to just love tossing jobs and money out of the country. Go figure. I miss United We Stand America. You can blame Clinton winning partly on me.

"Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." – Henry Spencer
QUOTE Thanks
toMACsh

 
toMACsh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 30, 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,598
toMACsh is a name known to alltoMACsh is a name known to alltoMACsh is a name known to alltoMACsh is a name known to alltoMACsh is a name known to alltoMACsh is a name known to alltoMACsh is a name known to all
Mac Specs: Mac Mini Core 2 Duo

toMACsh is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by louishen View Post
Lets all move to countries with the lowest tax rates (% of GDP)

...

Oh hang on. lets not

Guess I'll have to continue paying taxes to enjoy political freedom, rule of law and a working infrastructure
Well, around here, with an alarming percentage of bridges for vehicles rated as structurally deficient, that infrastructure is crumbling. Three bridges that I cross on the way to work are currently being replaced. I found them on the "worst" list for our state yesterday. I never knew, and how many others am I crossing that could fail?

But, yeah, on the tax thing, if governments need more revenue, change the tax laws and deal with the consequences.
QUOTE Thanks
osxx

 
osxx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 19, 2008
Location: houston texas
Posts: 4,680
osxx is a name known to allosxx is a name known to allosxx is a name known to allosxx is a name known to allosxx is a name known to allosxx is a name known to allosxx is a name known to all
Mac Specs: 09 MBP 8GB ram 500GB HD OS 10.9 32B iPad 4 32GB iPhone 5 iOs7 2TB TC Apple TV3

osxx is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by chscag View Post
A very wise Ross Perot once said (when he was running for president) "Giving the government more money in taxes is like giving a drug addict more drugs"!
Best statement yet.
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Birth of A Tyranosaur? | Computer Security »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Apple's iCloud, Steve Jobs Set To Star At Next Week's WWDC OneMoreThing... Apple Rumors and Reports 6 05-31-2011 09:09 PM
Local TV station visits Apple's data center OneMoreThing... Apple Rumors and Reports 3 04-26-2011 01:51 PM
Inside Apple's shareholder meeting and Q&A with Tim Cook the8thark Apple Rumors and Reports 3 02-24-2011 05:17 AM
Apple's iPod classic 5th most popular media player in 2010, unlikely to go away the8thark Apple Rumors and Reports 12 02-10-2011 03:41 AM
APple's market share in phones the8thark Apple Rumors and Reports 0 02-08-2011 08:07 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?