Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 83
  1. #1


    Member Since
    Jul 21, 2010
    Posts
    1
    Is Apple becoming Microsoft
    This is an interesting perspective, if a little longwinded. The premise being now that Apple has power, they are turning against their roots and becoming the new MS.

    I guess power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Jobs - Is Apple Becoming Arrogant? (Nothing Here But Trees)

  2. #2

    schweb's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 27, 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    13,190
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2
    I haven't read the article, but I will say now that Apple is no longer the "underdog" they do things sometimes that I don't think is right and sometimes even might verge on abuse of their market position.

    Now whether they do it purposely, do it because of Steve's ego, or unwittingly do it because they haven't come to grips yet with their market position, I don't know.

    But I will say that if Apple continues down the path it's been going, it will eventually get slapped hard by the Justice Department so hopefully somebody internally in the company is on top of this.
    schweb | community leader
    flickr facebook twitter tumblr google+ about.me

    Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr


  3. #3

    Village Idiot's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 04, 2007
    Location
    Durtburg, WV
    Posts
    2,641
    Specs:
    Sooper Fast!
    Can you put a leash on a CEO?

    Job's aggressiveness was fine when that's exactly what Apple needed to succeed and press forward in the market to make money. But now, they're going to need to transform from a "I do it how I want, when I want. I'm always right, you're always wrong", mentality to something with more finesse.

    Sure, keep up the good work and do what you're doing, just when you make a mistake (iPhone 4 antenna fiasco), don't basically call your consumers idiots and tell them that they're doing something as simple as holding a cell phone wrong. I know that it's really been blown out of proportion, but when you're becoming as high profile as Apple is it starts to become more beneficial to not shoot first and ask questions later.
    Chaotic Evil, Level 1 IT-Tech

    Slough Roast Blog
    Capitol Sound Blog

  4. #4

    schweb's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 27, 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    13,190
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2
    I'm not even referring to how they treat customers, it's worse than that in some cases. It's where they attempt to use market presence to limit choice.

    The way they reportedly threatened the record labels about selling music on Amazon is a good example.

    It's that type of stuff that will get them in the most trouble and makes them look the most like Microsoft.
    schweb | community leader
    flickr facebook twitter tumblr google+ about.me

    Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr


  5. #5

    osxx's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 19, 2008
    Location
    houston texas
    Posts
    4,695
    Specs:
    09 MBP 8GB ram 500GB HD OS 10.9 32B iPad 4 32GB iPhone 5 iOs7 2TB TC Apple TV3
    People vote with their pocket book when Apple quits making increasing profits quarter after quarter year after year then they need to change until then I don't see it happening.

  6. #6

    schweb's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 27, 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    13,190
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2
    Quote Originally Posted by osxx View Post
    People vote with their pocket book when Apple quits making increasing profits quarter after quarter year after year then they need to change until then I don't see it happening.
    That's only partially true, and it isn't why Microsoft changed.

    Microsoft only changed because the US an European government found them in violation of anti-trust laws.

    Apple won't be forced to change by the consumer, but if they unfairly leverage their position, they'll be forced to change by the law.
    schweb | community leader
    flickr facebook twitter tumblr google+ about.me

    Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr


  7. #7


    Member Since
    Apr 09, 2009
    Location
    Ithaca NY
    Posts
    2,073
    Specs:
    13 inch alMacBook 2GHz C2D 4G DDR3, 1.25GHz G4 eMac
    No. Apple has competent executives.

  8. #8

    torbjoern's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 30, 2009
    Posts
    107
    Specs:
    MacBook Air 13" Ultimate (2010)
    The author has made a good point about possible and actual issues for developers. And that's about it. Stating that Apple's iPhone 4 is to 3GS as Microsoft Windows Vista was to its predecessor XP—the return rate being even lower for the former in Apple's case, is drivel. Note that I'm not even questioning his comparison between software and hardware.

    If sending the phone to Apple in the rare case of replacing the battery is too much of a hassle, the choice is simple: buy another phone. I'm not saying that sealed-in batteries are a good thing per se, but if it considerably extends the battery life, then I don't really mind. The 3GS is my first iPhone, by the way. That's when the battery capacity was good enough for me to accept that it was non-user-replaceable. Until the release of the 3GS, there was no way I would buy an iPhone. Everyone has a choice.

    I also don't understand why his 3GS would run slow on iOS 4. Mine worked perfectly as always after the upgrade. Maybe the author has a 3G and not 3GS?
    Better lose a bar on the iPhone 4 than losing an iPhone 4 in the bar.

  9. #9


    Member Since
    Feb 12, 2010
    Posts
    39
    I definitely agree with the author, but some of his examples are too case by case based. For example, the iPhone upgrade not working. When I upgraded from Tiger to Leopard on my mac, it ran like a dog. Instead of instantly downgrading, i backed up my files and reformatted the drive. I did this for Snow Leopard and I have no issues regarding stability. This would be a good first step if my 3GS was giving me problems.

    I think what he is getting at in terms of Microsoft is too much brand diversification, and then intimidating their customers into using sub-par products. They have tried to get their hands into every sector of the tech market, while their core (Windows, Office, Exchange) suffer. Bill Gates summed this up when he envisioned every computer in the world running Microsoft software. In this world, I would have a computer with only the following software/peripherals/services:
    -Windows 7
    -Office 12
    -Bing
    -Internet Explorer
    -Outlook Express
    -Microsoft branded mouse/keyboard
    -A Zune HD
    -A Hotmail account

    By comparison, Apple's ideal customer has:
    -OS X (but windows or linux if you want)
    -Any word processor, but if you like, Pages
    -Google, Bing, Yahoo
    -Safari, but Mozilla and Chrome are looking good
    -an iPhone, but if you want porn, an Android
    -etc...

    Apple has realized that their customers don't need to be intimidated into using only their software. Microsoft hasn't.

  10. #10

    schweb's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 27, 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    13,190
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2
    Quote Originally Posted by jpepperman95 View Post
    In this world, I would have a computer with only the following software/peripherals/services:
    -Windows 7
    -Office 12
    -Bing
    -Internet Explorer
    -Outlook Express
    -Microsoft branded mouse/keyboard
    -A Zune HD
    -A Hotmail account

    By comparison, Apple's ideal customer has:
    -OS X (but windows or linux if you want)
    -Any word processor, but if you like, Pages
    -Google, Bing, Yahoo
    -Safari, but Mozilla and Chrome are looking good
    -an iPhone, but if you want porn, an Android
    -etc...

    Apple has realized that their customers don't need to be intimidated into using only their software. Microsoft hasn't.
    Ok now let's be fair....

    Apple doesn't include any browser except Safari in OS X. You can install others, but you can also install others in Windows including Chrome and Firefox. And Microsoft, at least in Europe, gives you a choice of browsers when you intall. Apple doesn't.

    Microsoft gives you a choice of search providers in IE, just like you can change from the Google default of Safari.

    Apple has tied the iPod to only work with iTunes.

    Apple supplies Apple-branded mice and keyboards with their Macs.

    Apple includes Mail app and bundles iLife with their new Macs. They also include at least a trial of iWorks.

    I mean let's be serious here, neither really is a pillar of open standards and ecosystems.
    schweb | community leader
    flickr facebook twitter tumblr google+ about.me

    Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr


  11. #11

    Village Idiot's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 04, 2007
    Location
    Durtburg, WV
    Posts
    2,641
    Specs:
    Sooper Fast!
    Quote Originally Posted by jpepperman95 View Post
    In this world, I would have a computer with only the following software/peripherals/services:
    -Windows 7
    -Office 12
    -Bing
    -Internet Explorer
    -Outlook Express
    -Microsoft branded mouse/keyboard
    -A Zune HD
    -A Hotmail account

    By comparison, Apple's ideal customer has:
    -OS X (but windows or linux if you want)
    -Any word processor, but if you like, Pages
    -Google, Bing, Yahoo
    -Safari, but Mozilla and Chrome are looking good
    -an iPhone, but if you want porn, an Android
    -etc...

    Apple has realized that their customers don't need to be intimidated into using only their software. Microsoft hasn't.
    I have a self built PC with the peripherals and specifications that I want and that are not pre picked by another company. Apart from that, this is what's in my world.

    Windows 7
    Chrome
    Google
    iTunes
    iPhone
    iPod
    Apple aluminum keyboard
    Logitech mouse
    Web mail
    Comcast e-mail account
    1&1 e-mail account
    Yahoo e-mail account

    The only thing I might possibly be missing is OS X.

    Kind of goes against the picture you're trying to paint.
    Chaotic Evil, Level 1 IT-Tech

    Slough Roast Blog
    Capitol Sound Blog

  12. #12

    dtravis7's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 04, 2005
    Location
    Modesto, Ca.
    Posts
    28,933
    Specs:
    iMac 2010 27" QuadI7 OSX10.11, iMac 2008 OSX10.11, MBP Late2011OSX10.11 , iPad Air, iPhone 3GS
    I always figured that is what Sooper Fast! meant in your specs.

  13. #13

    Village Idiot's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 04, 2007
    Location
    Durtburg, WV
    Posts
    2,641
    Specs:
    Sooper Fast!
    Quote Originally Posted by dtravis7 View Post
    I always figured that is what Sooper Fast! meant in your specs.
    I have MBP that I use for photo, video, and sound editing. I'd like a pro for that or at least an i7.

    That and I can't mention that which shall not be named.
    Chaotic Evil, Level 1 IT-Tech

    Slough Roast Blog
    Capitol Sound Blog

  14. #14

    SweetCosmicPope's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 16, 2009
    Location
    Baytown, Tx
    Posts
    373
    Specs:
    Late 2009 Macbook Pro 2.26, 160gb HD, 2gb RAM, OSX 10.6; Emac 1.42ghz 80gb HD 2gb RAM OSX 10.5
    Didn't read the article, but here's my 2-bits on the issue:

    Apple has been riding the pop-culture wave, well past their welcome. The iMac started bringing them back to life, but the iPod really shot them to stardom. They've still managed to do quite well with this, especially with the advent of the iPhone, but what we're starting to see now is the beginning of a revolution.

    Apple is starting to let their products suffer a little bit. And by that, I mean they are dragging out the timeline between updates, creating hardware designs that are faulty, they don't listen to the customer base concerning desires of design, and their customer service, which has historically been the best, has seen an increase in complaints.

    Add to that their head honcho. Steve Jobs, a visionary to be sure, has always pushed off the faults of their products on others, usually the developers or the customers. They have largely been overlooked for this by their loyal fan-base, however, that doesn't fly in the mainstream. That's ignoring his comments, which scare creators, that desktop computing is dead.

    There's also all of the lawsuits they pursue, or have been pursued against. This creates the image, no longer of the hippy, tree-hugging computer hacker favorite, but of the evil corporate giant.

    Personally, the only apple products I like are their PC line. OSX rocks my socks, and they provide a good interface. However, I do see the tide turning in a way I don't necessarily like, and apple as a company does many things I don't agree with, as does their eccentric head. I've found myself using more and more linux products in my daily life.
    "That's Peter Graves scat! I'd know it anywhere!"

  15. #15


    Member Since
    Jul 21, 2009
    Posts
    194
    Specs:
    Late 2008 MBP
    Jobs has become Apples own worst enemy.

    He has slowly started to become a caricature of a fashion designer from Zoolander. He no longer seems to care about the functionality of what they produce as he cares more about the design and how it looks.

    His disdain for buttons on the mouse turned off more than a few laptop users, my wife was one of those that hated the fact that she could do a right mouse click that she stopped using her macbook and went back to a PC... I fully expect that we shall soon see a shiny black or white slate that looks oh so sexy, It will be Jobs vision of a new computer, yet it will have no screen or buttons on it because they would interfere with the flow of the design. When a journalist asks how user are supposed to see anything on the screen which isn't there Jobs will simply say, "I will know what is on the screen so we do not need a screen to confirm what I know."

    At the rate Apple is going that is where they are headed, to become some futuristic design firm that parades around useless products that look good but have no functionality because the function would get in the way of the design.

    Long term I would short Apple shares, because as long as Jobs is there the company is at risk of self destructing.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Microsoft Using APPLE!
    By Nikonshooter in forum Schweb's Lounge
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-31-2010, 02:21 AM
  2. Microsoft on Apple Blog
    By beauty.and.the. in forum Schweb's Lounge
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-27-2010, 11:15 AM
  3. First Microsoft, next Apple??
    By Del in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-17-2007, 01:03 AM
  4. Apple Going After Microsoft?
    By rs2sensen in forum Schweb's Lounge
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-08-2005, 03:07 PM
  5. Microsoft and Apple
    By RGertner in forum Schweb's Lounge
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-31-2005, 04:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •