Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20
  1. #1

    XJ-linux's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 02, 2007
    Location
    Going Galt...
    Posts
    3,453
    Specs:
    MacBookAir5,2:10.9.5-MacMini3,1:10.9.5-iPhone6,1:8.4.1
    Thumbs up SCOTUS Rules in Favor of McDonald
    Read and enjoy... what a nice way to start the week!

    High court strikes down Chicago handgun ban - CNN.com
    Never judge a man, untill you have walked a mile in his shoes...
    That way you'll be a mile away from him, and you'll have his shoes.

  2. #2

    baggss's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 10, 2004
    Location
    Margaritaville
    Posts
    10,326
    Specs:
    3.4 Ghz i7 27 in iMac (2012), 3.4 Ghz i7 MacBook Pro (2015), iPad Pro (2014), iPhone 6+
    It was a 5-4 decision. That kind of split bodes poorly with the age of the court.


  3. #3

    XJ-linux's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 02, 2007
    Location
    Going Galt...
    Posts
    3,453
    Specs:
    MacBookAir5,2:10.9.5-MacMini3,1:10.9.5-iPhone6,1:8.4.1
    Yeah, I think I heard someone else was quitting the Court this week as well. 50/50 checks and balances... I guess it all works out in the end.
    Never judge a man, untill you have walked a mile in his shoes...
    That way you'll be a mile away from him, and you'll have his shoes.

  4. #4

    Kash's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 03, 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    9,385
    Specs:
    Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G
    Quote Originally Posted by baggss View Post
    It was a 5-4 decision. That kind of split bodes poorly with the age of the court.
    The vast majority of ideological SCOTUS decisions are 5-4 votes. Nothing new here.

    Looks like the court was simply reiterating its decision in DC vs. Heller that also struck down a strict gun ban. Actually, this is even better since it was applied to Chicago and not a federal province like DC. Looks like we're finally going to see a slew of gun bans either being overturned across the country or local governments changing their gun laws to be in accordance with the Second Amendment.

    June 2007
    July 2009

  5. #5

    Sc00ter's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jun 08, 2010
    Location
    In the woods
    Posts
    4
    Specs:
    HAL - G4-DA running QS 933MHz cpu. 7 HDDs (680GB). USB 1.1/2.0. 1GB ram. OS X.4.11
    Thumbs up
    Caught that in this mornings Supreme Court News. Very good news at that. Still I wince every time there's a 5-4 decision. the makeup of the court can change in a moment and so can the outcomes of the decisions in the future. I follow and write my Reps regularly but that's just me. I'm an old 60s activist anyway.

    Sc00t
    A conference is a gathering of important people who singly can do nothing, but together can decide that nothing can be done. - Fred Allen

  6. #6

    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,954
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Glad that the highest court in the land can still read the Bill of Rights. It's not like it's ambiguous in its wording "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  7. #7

    bobtomay's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 22, 2006
    Location
    Texas, where else?
    Posts
    26,541
    Specs:
    15" MBP '06 2.33 C2D 4GB 10.7; 13" MBA '14 1.8 i7 8GB 10.11; 21" iMac '13 2.9 i5 8GB 10.11; 6S
    Yeah, well it seems 44% of them can't read it. And if something happens to one of them in the next 3 years we'll end up with only 44% that can read.
    I cannot be held responsible for the things that come out of my mouth.
    In the Windows world, most everything folks don't understand is called a virus.

  8. #8

    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,954
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Quote Originally Posted by bobtomay View Post
    Yeah, well it seems 44% of them can't read it. And if something happens to one of them in the next 3 years we'll end up with only 44% that can read.
    Scary, but true.
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  9. #9

    Kash's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 03, 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    9,385
    Specs:
    Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G
    Quote Originally Posted by cwa107 View Post
    Glad that the highest court in the land can still read the Bill of Rights. It's not like it's ambiguous in its wording "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".
    Well actually, it IS ambiguous, hence the controversy. You only quoted half the amendment. There are two clauses:

    1. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...
    2. ...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

    The problem is that some people don't see two separate clauses, they see just a single clause; to them only a militia is qualified to bear arms. There has been decades of debate on this issue. However, the court has now, for the second time, established that the two clauses are discrete entities and that private citizens do have the right to possess weapons.

    June 2007
    July 2009

  10. #10

    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,954
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Quote Originally Posted by Kash View Post
    Well actually, it IS ambiguous, hence the controversy. You only quoted half the amendment. There are two clauses:

    1. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...
    2. ...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

    The problem is that some people don't see two separate clauses, they see just a single clause; to them only a militia is qualified to bear arms. There has been decades of debate on this issue. However, the court has now, for the second time, established that the two clauses are discrete entities and that private citizens do have the right to possess weapons.
    Thank you Professor Kash, I understand that.

    My point was that it seems pretty straightforward to my eyes.
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  11. #11

    baggss's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 10, 2004
    Location
    Margaritaville
    Posts
    10,326
    Specs:
    3.4 Ghz i7 27 in iMac (2012), 3.4 Ghz i7 MacBook Pro (2015), iPad Pro (2014), iPhone 6+
    Quote Originally Posted by Kash View Post
    Well actually, it IS ambiguous, hence the controversy. You only quoted half the amendment. There are two clauses:

    1. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...
    2. ...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

    The problem is that some people don't see two separate clauses, they see just a single clause; to them only a militia is qualified to bear arms. There has been decades of debate on this issue. However, the court has now, for the second time, established that the two clauses are discrete entities and that private citizens do have the right to possess weapons.
    I don't see it as two separate clauses, simply as one. I do believe that they intended the clause to mean that citizens could bear arm to form militias for defense. They neither specified nor implied, however, that citizens could not bear arms even when not part of a militia, or for any other reason. One could make an assumption either way, and that is where the issue comes in.

    Then again, I've always been a "Middle of the road" kind of person....


  12. #12


    Member Since
    Apr 09, 2009
    Location
    Ithaca NY
    Posts
    2,073
    Specs:
    13 inch alMacBook 2GHz C2D 4G DDR3, 1.25GHz G4 eMac
    Yay, now it will be that much more likely that I will be shot while visiting Chicago. This is a great thing?

    You crazy right wingers and your guns! lol

    I mean, don't get me wrong. I know it's in the Bill of Rights. I just think I'd feel a little bit better on the South Side if I knew that it was harder for people to be packing heat.

  13. #13

    schweb's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 27, 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    13,190
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2
    Quote Originally Posted by cwa107 View Post
    Glad that the highest court in the land can still read the Bill of Rights. It's not like it's ambiguous in its wording "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".
    It all depends on what version you read and where that darn comma is at.

    But really, I see the Constitutional question of whether the right to bear arms is subject to reasonable regulation in the same light I view the ability to regulate freedom of speech. There sometimes is a need, e.g. yelling fire in a crowded theater.

    Not everything in the Bill of Rights should be construed to allow all behavior despite its cost on society. There has to be a balance.
    schweb | community leader
    flickr facebook twitter tumblr google+ about.me

    Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr


  14. #14

    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,954
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Quote Originally Posted by DarkestRitual View Post
    Yay, now it will be that much more likely that I will be shot while visiting Chicago. This is a great thing?

    You crazy right wingers and your guns! lol

    I mean, don't get me wrong. I know it's in the Bill of Rights. I just think I'd feel a little bit better on the South Side if I knew that it was harder for people to be packing heat.
    Right, because violent criminals always respect gun laws where enforced.
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  15. #15


    Member Since
    Jul 21, 2009
    Posts
    194
    Specs:
    Late 2008 MBP
    This was really a can't lose decision for me.

    I live in a gun loving state so I'm not worried one way or the other. In fact I kind of wanted them to say the Chicago ban was kosher, had they done that the implication would have been wonderful.

    No longer would the states be required to follow the bill of rights (as that was what the decision was about, not about how to interpret the clause as someone had posted it was simply a question as to whether states had to abide by the Constitution).

    BUT if they had upheld it, all the God fearing Gun loving folks in the southern states could have felt free to ignore the other parts of the bill of rights... imagine, we could outlaw Islam, hand out any punishment we felt necessary without considering whether it was cruel or unusual (hanging car thieves would be a start) and pretty much ignored most of the Constitution with regard to laws within a state.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Swedish McDonald's ads use iPhone to play Pong, get coupons
    By OneMoreThing... in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-06-2011, 07:11 AM
  2. A favor or two
    By antizero in forum OS X - Apps and Games
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-17-2006, 11:13 PM
  3. Need A Favor
    By Mr.Curlynose1 in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-25-2004, 06:30 PM
  4. McDonald's to give away up to 1 billion iTunes songs?
    By Murlyn in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-10-2003, 11:15 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •