New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac Discussion of Classic or running Windows, Linux and other OSes on the Mac.

Fusion or Parallels


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
maccernow

 
Member Since: Feb 13, 2008
Posts: 54
maccernow can only hope to improve

maccernow is offline
Regardless of what ive said before on some of my threads im coming round to the idea of a full switch. Basically the more I play and learn the more I love.

Im looking at full switch but still need some windows software and boot camp is not convenient enough.

looking at fusion or parallels to run vista or XP if required. Has anyone any experience.

Also one of the business packages that i use in windows allows me to generate reports directly into MS word. I wonder how this sort of scenario would work on a dual systems. Will the report link into Mac word or Windows word ???

Some feedback would be great. Thanks
QUOTE Thanks
theonegod

 
theonegod's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 02, 2006
Posts: 476
theonegod has a spectacular aura about
Mac Specs: 24" 2.8ghz IMAC, MB Pro

theonegod is offline
I always recommend VMware. It has more robust support all around including DX9 and seems to run faster. It also will make for easier transitions if you ever feel like moving your VM from your mac to a different machine and want to run it with VMware server or workstation on say a PC.

Unity mode in VMware also works better then the parallels equivalent for me.
QUOTE Thanks
Rambaud

 
Member Since: Sep 15, 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 236
Rambaud is on a distinguished road

Rambaud is offline
I have (and use) both.

I used to find Fusion to be better, but the latest version of Parallels has narrowed/extinguished the gap.

Parallels only supports Vista and XP, while Fusion supports them and Win 2000, 98, 95 etc plus Linux, Solaris etc.
QUOTE Thanks
quantumdrift

 
Member Since: Dec 03, 2006
Posts: 3
quantumdrift is on a distinguished road

quantumdrift is offline
I have not used both products so I can't comment on which one is better, but I have been using Parallels for a little over a year now and have had only a few minor issues with it, and no issues at all recently.

I would like to point out though that Parallels does indeed support more than just Win XP and Vista. I have it running Win2K, XP, Vista, Fedora 8, Ubuntu, and OpenSUSE.

As I said, I can't give you an opinion on which is better, I can only tell you about my mostly positive experience with Parallels.
QUOTE Thanks
cwa107

 
cwa107's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 20, 2006
Location: Middletown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 26,494
cwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD

cwa107 is offline
I am evaluating Fusion at the moment as I've seen so many recommendations for it here. In comparing the two side-by-side, Parallels is certainly more refined - particularly in terms of how it handles screen resolution changes and transitions. Although Fusion claims to support DX9, none of my games seem to think it does, despite the fact that I enabled it in the VM config. I'm guessing there's something going on with the driver, but in Parallels, enabling 3D support is as simple as checking a box.

So, right now, I'm leaning toward letting the evaluation expire. I was really hoping to see better game support and superior performance (particularly since it supports 64-bit and multi-core processors), but I'd say they're about even, and in some cases Parallels is more refined.

Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!
QUOTE Thanks
MacKat

 
MacKat's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 20, 2008
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 69
MacKat is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Whitebook 2.2, 4gb RAM, 200gb 7200RPM HD

MacKat is offline
I use Parallels 3 for XP, Ubuntu, and Solaris and have not had a problem. It was the first one I tried and (I believe) the first one out for Intel Mac's VM users.

At this point I think the debate has gone the direction of Canon v Nikon...use whichever one you particular find useful. I doubt you could go wrong with either.

Kat

"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." -- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
QUOTE Thanks
maccernow

 
Member Since: Feb 13, 2008
Posts: 54
maccernow can only hope to improve

maccernow is offline
OK guys..... thanks. I think ill go for an olympus then. LOL
QUOTE Thanks
Zoolook

 
Zoolook's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 24, 2006
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 2,751
Zoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: 15" MacBook Pro, i7 2.66Ghz, 8GB RAM, 512GB SSD; iPad 3, iPhone 5

Zoolook is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacKat View Post
I use Parallels 3 for XP, Ubuntu, and Solaris and have not had a problem. It was the first one I tried and (I believe) the first one out for Intel Mac's VM users.

At this point I think the debate has gone the direction of Canon v Nikon...use whichever one you particular find useful. I doubt you could go wrong with either.

Kat
I agree with this - I started with Parallels, used the VM Fusion 'trial' but stuck with Parallels. Fusion has a few advantages, in regard to using both cores etc, however Parallels is a little easier to get to grips with and I prefer its coherence mode to anything on Fusion.

I use it for XP SP 2 and SuSE Linux.

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is stoned to death.
- Joan D. Vinge

QUOTE Thanks
kentsb

 
kentsb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 19, 2008
Posts: 58
kentsb is on a distinguished road

kentsb is offline
I just started using Parallels 3.0. It took three attempts before XP finally installed without freezing. I had some problems initallly with Photoshop Elements 4 when it was first installed. It appears to be fine now. XP recognized my Brother printer as an HP. It also appears to work regardless of the mis-identification. I am very happy with how Parallels manages two OS's at the same time as with how XP loads faster than it does on my PC. I have not tried any other products to compare.
QUOTE Thanks
Rambaud

 
Member Since: Sep 15, 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 236
Rambaud is on a distinguished road

Rambaud is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumdrift View Post

I would like to point out though that Parallels does indeed support more than just Win XP and Vista. I have it running Win2K, XP, Vista, Fedora 8, Ubuntu, and OpenSUSE.
My mistake - sorry.

I have never gone past Parallels first screen for installing a new OS, so did not read it correctly.
QUOTE Thanks
btdickey

 
btdickey's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 15, 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 59
btdickey is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook Black; 2.2 ghz core duo; 2 gb 667 mhz DDR2 SDRam; 8x SuperDrive; 160 gb hdd

btdickey is offline
Vmware
QUOTE Thanks
blah

 
blah's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 27, 2008
Posts: 50
blah is on a distinguished road

blah is offline
I've read a number of posts pointing out the more favorable licensing terms of VMware, if that matters to you.
QUOTE Thanks
mapexvenus

 
Member Since: Jun 24, 2007
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 71
mapexvenus is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Macbook Pro 2.2 Ghz/ 2GB RAM / 120 GB HDD

mapexvenus is offline
I use Fusion and am quite happy with it expect for the following pet peeves:

1. Audio is choppy when played in Fusion. My MBP has 4 GB RAM of which 2 GB is allocated to running Vista within Fusion.
2. No support for external Firewire drives.

I am an Apple customer, not a fanboy.
QUOTE Thanks
mac747

 
mac747's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 01, 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 385
mac747 will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: 2.2GHZ Macbook Pro - 4GB RAM - 500GB HD

mac747 is offline
Do both require "full retail versions" of XP? I have Enterprise copies at work and I can't use them with bootcamp and I chatted with a VMWare person last night and she said I need FRV for Fusion. Does Parrallels require this as well or can I use an Enterprise copy of WinXp with Parallels?

Thanks.
QUOTE Thanks
SammySlim

 
Member Since: Feb 12, 2008
Posts: 937
SammySlim is a jewel in the roughSammySlim is a jewel in the rough

SammySlim is offline
I tried both Parallels and Fusion and settled on Fusion. Seemed easier to use and faster to me. I think Unity mode and Coherence are about the same. But YMMV and, for all practical purposes, they are essentially even. I don't do gaming so will leave that to others (and if I did, would use bootcamp anyway).

Re the last post, I used an OEM copy of XP. Our enterprise product key would not work (but who knows, yours might). In any case, an OEM version of XP works fine and is much cheaper than the retail version.

Cheers
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Any way to access my Mac Pro from my Windows Laptop? | Linux and Boot Camp Troubleshooting »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Windows Vista or XP under Fusion or Parallels? seasurfer Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac 8 12-30-2007 03:14 AM
Parallels -vs- Fusion ScottCT1 Switcher Hangout 13 10-01-2007 03:55 PM
VMWare Fusion and Parallels in the same Bootcamp partition? ernani Switcher Hangout 0 09-01-2007 01:45 AM
parallels to vmware fusion? Ramacher Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac 5 08-26-2007 01:44 AM
A newbie comments on his first experience with Parallels 3150 NJRonbo Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac 0 02-02-2007 06:41 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?