Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: KDE 4 is out!

  1. #1


    Member Since
    Sep 18, 2007
    Location
    Guam
    Posts
    1,004
    Specs:
    Gateway2000 P5-60. 66Mhz and 128 MB RAM.
    KDE 4 is out!
    KDE 4.0 is out and looks a lot like Mac OS X and Windows. You can also run it on OS X as they both use X11!
    http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9849110-39.html

  2. #2

    mac57's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 29, 2006
    Location
    St. Somewhere
    Posts
    4,560
    Specs:
    iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, 256 GB SSD, 2 TB HDD, 8 GB RAM
    Kall me a Luddite, but I liked the look of KDE 3.5 a lot better!

    ...yes, it is an intentional misspelling!
    My Macs: iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, Mac Pro 3.2 GHz, PowerMac G5 Quad 2.5 GHz, G4 Cube with 1.2 GHz Upgrade
    My iStuff: 64GB iPhone 5, 64GB iPad4, 30GB iPod Video, 16GB iPod Touch
    My OS': Mac OS X Lion, Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Mac OS X Tiger, Mac OS 9.2.2, openSUSE 10.3
    I was on the Mac-Forums honor roll for September 2007

  3. #3

    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,911
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Installing Kubuntu 7.10 on Parallels at the moment. I take it I should be able to install the update via system updates? I've seen screen shots and it looks pretty sweet.
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  4. #4


    Member Since
    Sep 18, 2007
    Location
    Guam
    Posts
    1,004
    Specs:
    Gateway2000 P5-60. 66Mhz and 128 MB RAM.
    Yep I am currently installing it in ubuntu right now. Hopefully it works. You have to add a repository and then download via synaptic. I cant wait!!! It seems alot easier to do in gnome then KDE 3.5. I wonder if the widgets are as good???
    mac 57: Why do you like 3.5 better?Just curious. Please don't destroy my loom

  5. #5


    Member Since
    Sep 18, 2007
    Location
    Guam
    Posts
    1,004
    Specs:
    Gateway2000 P5-60. 66Mhz and 128 MB RAM.
    Woo Hoo!!! Got it running. Way simpler to setup then Gnome or KDE 3.5. I had to install Adobe Flash player and this is the first time I was able to do it without opening a terminal. It's very sleek. The widgets are very nice too!!
    *edit*
    Well It crashed. It worked great the first time and now wont work at all. Back to the drawing board.

  6. #6

    mac57's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 29, 2006
    Location
    St. Somewhere
    Posts
    4,560
    Specs:
    iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, 256 GB SSD, 2 TB HDD, 8 GB RAM
    Quote Originally Posted by mac0s9user View Post
    mac 57: Why do you like 3.5 better?Just curious. Please don't destroy my loom
    It is just a personal taste thing, and it is probably something you can change. KDE has always been VERY configurable. I simply don't like the dominance of really dark colors. Vista is like this too. KDE 3.x's dominant blue'ish tones were/are very appealing to me personally.

    I am sure you can change 4.0 to be Blue again, but the default that I see in the screen caps doesn't appeal to me. As silly as it seems, one of the things I have never liked about Gnome is also color related: the dominance of earth tones. I just don't like the look.

    Also, I HEAR that KDE 4.0 is mostly an "under the hood" release - huge changes internally, but only basic stuff externally (visible). All of the Linux mags I read say that we need to wait for a 4.1 or a 4.2 to start seeing the benefit of all the tinkering that has gone on "under the hood".

    Finally however, I worry that KDE is simply getting too big and too bloated. 3.5.7 still moves pretty well on my 3.0 GHz machines, but as they add more and more, they seem to be tending towards the Microsoft model of "bigger is better". This is distressing.

    Even good 'ol XFCE is getting fatter and slower. At the moment, my favorite desktop environment for Linux is the combination of XFCE4 with Rox Filer for the desktop. I manually edit the startup files to eliminate the XFCE4 desktop and lots of other stuff and put Rox in its place. The net result is lightening fast, even on slower machines. Rox is a darn capable desktop and file manager.
    My Macs: iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, Mac Pro 3.2 GHz, PowerMac G5 Quad 2.5 GHz, G4 Cube with 1.2 GHz Upgrade
    My iStuff: 64GB iPhone 5, 64GB iPad4, 30GB iPod Video, 16GB iPod Touch
    My OS': Mac OS X Lion, Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Mac OS X Tiger, Mac OS 9.2.2, openSUSE 10.3
    I was on the Mac-Forums honor roll for September 2007

  7. #7

    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,911
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Just FYI to anyone attempting to install Kubuntu under Parallels to try out KDE 4 (as I mentioned in my previous post), it's not straightforward. The instructions for doing so are available here.
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  8. #8


    Member Since
    Sep 18, 2007
    Location
    Guam
    Posts
    1,004
    Specs:
    Gateway2000 P5-60. 66Mhz and 128 MB RAM.
    Well mac57, I see your point. 3.5 does seem more bloated. But this version of KDE seems surprisingly minimalistic. maybe when 4.1 comes it will be bloated. i still dont understand why they keep including Konquerer. Its a terrible browser in my opinion

    On a side note I finally got it running smoothly. There are still a few bugs but I am working on them.

  9. #9

    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,911
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Wish I could say the same. I installed it according to the instructions out on the Kubuntu support page, but it seems like the old version is still there when I logged out and logged back in.
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  10. #10


    Member Since
    Sep 18, 2007
    Location
    Guam
    Posts
    1,004
    Specs:
    Gateway2000 P5-60. 66Mhz and 128 MB RAM.
    Did you try this iso? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/gutsy/kde4/

    It's what I used. The one on the main download page is the older KDE. This one was in a rather odd place on the kubuntu website

  11. #11

    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,911
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Quote Originally Posted by mac0s9user View Post
    Did you try this iso? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/gutsy/kde4/

    It's what I used. The one on the main download page is the older KDE. This one was in a rather odd place on the kubuntu website
    No, I didn't I was using the official release of 7.10. I'll give this a shot - thanks a lot, MacOs9!
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  12. #12

    mac57's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 29, 2006
    Location
    St. Somewhere
    Posts
    4,560
    Specs:
    iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, 256 GB SSD, 2 TB HDD, 8 GB RAM
    Quote Originally Posted by mac0s9user View Post
    Well mac57, I see your point. 3.5 does seem more bloated. But this version of KDE seems surprisingly minimalistic. maybe when 4.1 comes it will be bloated. i still dont understand why they keep including Konquerer. Its a terrible browser in my opinion

    On a side note I finally got it running smoothly. There are still a few bugs but I am working on them.
    Congrats on getting it running smoothly. I hope you enjoy it!

    Konqueror? I agree, not a great browser, but it is a terrific file manager (and FTP client). I really like it frankly.
    My Macs: iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, Mac Pro 3.2 GHz, PowerMac G5 Quad 2.5 GHz, G4 Cube with 1.2 GHz Upgrade
    My iStuff: 64GB iPhone 5, 64GB iPad4, 30GB iPod Video, 16GB iPod Touch
    My OS': Mac OS X Lion, Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Mac OS X Tiger, Mac OS 9.2.2, openSUSE 10.3
    I was on the Mac-Forums honor roll for September 2007

  13. #13


    Member Since
    Sep 18, 2007
    Location
    Guam
    Posts
    1,004
    Specs:
    Gateway2000 P5-60. 66Mhz and 128 MB RAM.
    No problem. I hope you get it working! Also one major bug that bothered me was that the package manager is missing Smart Package manager. I ran sudo apt-get install smartpm-core in terminal to get it to work and everything else went great. It's pretty bare bones so a package manager is very helpful
    Good Luck!


    Thanks mac57. I like konquerer as a file browser too. Just not an internet browser

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Anybody try KDE on Snow Leopard yet?
    By cptkrf in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-19-2010, 06:59 PM
  2. KDE native install
    By gunnerjoe in forum OS X - Development and Darwin
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-11-2005, 06:20 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •