New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus • Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts • Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac Discussion of Classic or running Windows, Linux and other OSes on the Mac.

VMware vs Parallels vs Bootcamp: tested


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
fleurya

 
fleurya's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 18, 2006
Location: Anytown, USA
Posts: 4,922
fleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to all
Mac Specs: 27" iMac 2.7GHz Core i5, iPhone 4S, 3rd gen iPad

fleurya is offline
If you're wondering which method of running Windows apps is fastest, CNET has run some tests and it looks like the upstart, VMware Fusion, has beaten Parallels, but Bootcamp is obviously still the best.

Here's the story with test results:
http://crave.cnet.com/8301-1_105-9760910-1.html

"Give so much time to the improvement of yourself that you have no time to criticize others"
QUOTE Thanks
Kash

 
Kash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 9,385
Kash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G

Kash is offline
Wow, the performance gap is MASSIVE. I figured maybe a couple of seconds here, a couple frame there, but nowhere close to what I saw on those benchmarks.

Even though Parallels works fine for me, I'm gonna have to give Fusion a try now


June 2007
July 2009
QUOTE Thanks
Zoolook

 
Zoolook's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 24, 2006
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 2,751
Zoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: 15" MacBook Pro, i7 2.66Ghz, 8GB RAM, 512GB SSD; iPad 3, iPhone 5

Zoolook is offline
Interesting.

I only use Parallels for MS Money, nothing else, so dual core speed is not an issue. However if it was, based on this, I might switch to VM Fusion.

Crossover is not reliable enough for me - I really wish iBank would get onto version 3.0 and allow downloads from banks, because then I could dump my windows installation.

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is stoned to death.
- Joan D. Vinge

QUOTE Thanks
Larrykin

 
Member Since: Oct 05, 2007
Posts: 7
Larrykin is on a distinguished road

Larrykin is offline
I tried using the demo of Parallels but it was not very stable, which is a shame as I wanted to support them more than VMware as they were a new company.

But VMware also seems a lot faster and many of the links I've read seem to agree (although it's not 100% VMware's way).

http://macmegasite.com/node/3343

http://www.designtalkboard.com/revie..._vs_vmware.php

http://logicalvue.com/blog/2007/06/s...vmware-fusion/

Parallels seems to have more features, but, I've decided to go with VMware as I think that they will probably add those features in version 2 or something. Here's hoping.
QUOTE Thanks
Lycus

 
Lycus's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 02, 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 32
Lycus is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook C2D 2.0ghz

Lycus is offline
Parallels acted unstable on my system, so I tried VMWare Fusion. Not only does it run non-Windows OSes much better, it actually hardly ever crashes!

inánia·uerba·sunt
QUOTE Thanks
Eric559

 
Eric559's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 18, 2007
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,185
Eric559 is a glorious beacon of lightEric559 is a glorious beacon of lightEric559 is a glorious beacon of lightEric559 is a glorious beacon of lightEric559 is a glorious beacon of lightEric559 is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: 2.16GHz C2D MacBook w/ 2GB RAM & 120GB HD. HTC Droid Incredible.

Eric559 is offline
I was messing around with the VMware Fusion trial which is available from their website. I enjoyed it but when I didn't have it open it felt like my computer slowed down greatly. I uninstalled it and everything was back to normal then. Maybe I was just imagining it or something.
QUOTE Thanks
voided3

 
Member Since: Apr 08, 2007
Posts: 86
voided3 is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Macbook Pro 15.4", Core Duo 2.16ghz, 2gig of RAM

voided3 is offline
Quote:
I was messing around with the VMware Fusion trial which is available from their website. I enjoyed it but when I didn't have it open it felt like my computer slowed down greatly. I uninstalled it and everything was back to normal then. Maybe I was just imagining it or something.
All virtual machine servers install extra background services for things such as NAT networking and virtual disk managers, so that is understandable.
QUOTE Thanks
goobimama

 
Member Since: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 2,542
goobimama is a jewel in the roughgoobimama is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: iMac Core Duo 20", iBook G4, iPhone 8GB :)

goobimama is offline
What a crappy test. They've got all the resources, yet they perform just a few tests. Makes it seem almost like they were paid to make Fusion win...
QUOTE Thanks
scotttkd

 
Member Since: Jul 20, 2007
Posts: 9
scotttkd is on a distinguished road

scotttkd is offline
i boosted my macbook memory to 2gig and had a noticeable improvement in performance with fusion. have had no problems at all and use it daily for work.
QUOTE Thanks
Matt Deasay

 
Matt Deasay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 10, 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 105
Matt Deasay will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: 24" iMac 2.8 Ghz 4GB RAM OS X 10.5.1

Matt Deasay is offline
I'm running parallels and haven't had any problems with it. Might have to check out VMWare.
QUOTE Thanks
Matt Deasay

 
Matt Deasay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 10, 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 105
Matt Deasay will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: 24" iMac 2.8 Ghz 4GB RAM OS X 10.5.1

Matt Deasay is offline
Sorry for the double post, but I have a quick question.

Anyone know if it's possible to transfer my current Virtual Machine in Parallels to VMWare Fusion?
QUOTE Thanks
Eric559

 
Eric559's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 18, 2007
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,185
Eric559 is a glorious beacon of lightEric559 is a glorious beacon of lightEric559 is a glorious beacon of lightEric559 is a glorious beacon of lightEric559 is a glorious beacon of lightEric559 is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: 2.16GHz C2D MacBook w/ 2GB RAM & 120GB HD. HTC Droid Incredible.

Eric559 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by voided3 View Post
All virtual machine servers install extra background services for things such as NAT networking and virtual disk managers, so that is understandable.
Yeah that is probably why. I really liked and enjoyed VMware Fusion though.
QUOTE Thanks
smartyMAC

 
smartyMAC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 20, 2007
Location: Land of Rising Sun
Posts: 337
smartyMAC will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: MB White 160GB, 2GB RAM,

smartyMAC is offline
Codeweaver seems to be what I wanted to get rid of windows yet run the windows apps like Ymessenger, MS Money etc.... Surely gonna try
QUOTE Thanks
fleurya

 
fleurya's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 18, 2006
Location: Anytown, USA
Posts: 4,922
fleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to allfleurya is a name known to all
Mac Specs: 27" iMac 2.7GHz Core i5, iPhone 4S, 3rd gen iPad

fleurya is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by goobimama View Post
What a crappy test. They've got all the resources, yet they perform just a few tests. Makes it seem almost like they were paid to make Fusion win...
Well, if one program only accesses one core and the other accesses both, it'll be tough to find a test that will show Parallels working better than Fusion. I think if they did any more testing, it would just be more of the same.

"Give so much time to the improvement of yourself that you have no time to criticize others"
QUOTE Thanks
wytey

 
Member Since: Sep 25, 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 61
wytey is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MBP 15" 2.4GHz 4Gb OCZ RAM

wytey is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by goobimama View Post
What a crappy test. They've got all the resources, yet they perform just a few tests. Makes it seem almost like they were paid to make Fusion win...
agreed, iirc, in Fusion, it defaults to single core, and you can tell it how many cores to use... so why didn't they simple test Fusion twice? single core and multicore.

like fleurya says though, doesn't matter how many more tests they run, Fusion will win purely because it is a single core vs multi core test. and for that reason alone, that test and many others are just information on performance on single and multi core, until they test Fusion using a single core or Parallels release a multi core version, the tests mean squat as a comparison between the two.

what people must also remember, by giving Fusion access to both cores, OSX could potentially suffer far greater than if you were running Parallels or limiting Fusion to a single core, obviously depends on what you are doing on both OS's.

at the end of the day, each to their own the performance of Parallels is more than adequate for me, and aesthetically I prefer Parallels over Fusion, and Smart Select is also a clincher for me forget what the tests say, just use what you are happy with
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Windows Installation with Boot Camp Problems | Emulators for a thought »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VMWare Fusion + Vista + Bootcamp killawattz Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac 5 10-12-2008 03:23 AM
Parallels and Bootcamp...single XP install? bryank89 Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac 3 06-05-2007 11:22 AM
Can I run Bootcamp and Parallels on vista CORRY20 Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac 20 04-25-2007 03:19 PM
Issues with Parallels and BootCamp - activation, AVG Anti-Virus, Quicken mokjok Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac 0 03-12-2007 07:45 AM
A newbie comments on his first experience with Parallels 3150 NJRonbo Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac 0 02-02-2007 06:41 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?