Thread: crossover speed vs parallels
06-23-2008, 11:40 PM #1
crossover speed vs parallels
- Member Since
- Aug 21, 2007
i know its been discussed, i googled it, i searched it here but i didn't find an immediate answer to just a simple question. Is crossover faster for my intentions vs booting windows xp ?
I just want to run ie6 for cross browser testing and looking to have the fastest solution that does not take up a ton of ram. If crossover eats up as much ram and cpu as parallels i might as well go with that since it has my entire xp os on it, thoughts?
Spare me any flaming on this. thanks.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By LinLin in forum OS X - Operating SystemReplies: 4Last Post: 03-02-2010, 10:07 AM
By NeilP in forum OS X - Apps and GamesReplies: 3Last Post: 02-28-2009, 11:59 AM
By jds670 in forum OS X - Apps and GamesReplies: 2Last Post: 11-30-2008, 08:30 AM
By xurizaemon in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your MacReplies: 0Last Post: 01-28-2008, 01:56 PM
By KahluaFan in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your MacReplies: 0Last Post: 05-08-2007, 07:18 PM