Difference between PowerPC and Intel Macs

Neptune · Neptune #1 (**permalink**)

11-12-2007, 08:20 PM

Do you think that the PowerPC Macs are the "real" Macs because the Intel Macs currently use the x86 architecture which is PC standard. Does the PowerPC architecture make Macs "real" Macs and x86 architecture Macs are just "PCs running OS X"?
I think Intel Macs are still Macs and are different than PCs. Intel Macs use EFI instead of BIOS which separates it being from a "PC" and I am sure that there are more little differences in between.

NanoBite · NanoBite #2 (**permalink**)

11-12-2007, 08:42 PM

Not off topic, but just a side note about EFI .... IIRC, Microsoft had first dibs on EFI but in the end asked themselves; "why should we changed over from BIOS to EFI when this change could have an adverse negative affect on our consumer market".

If they changed over then might their buyers go somewhere else? Ergo, why change something that works?

I do have the source of this somewhere if it's requested.

.

Zoolook · Zoolook #3 (**permalink**)

11-12-2007, 08:59 PM

Two things make something a Mac, at least now, IMO. Mac OS X and Apple Design. It doesn't matter what is under the bonnet.

NanoBite · NanoBite #4 (**permalink**)

11-12-2007, 09:02 PM

Very good response .... The design and OS look/feel is undeniably unique and they are the things that the average user are in touch with most frequently.

baggss · baggss #5 (**permalink**)

11-12-2007, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neptune

Do you think that the PowerPC Macs are the "real" Macs because the Intel Macs currently use the x86 architecture which is PC standard. Does the PowerPC architecture make Macs "real" Macs and x86 architecture Macs are just "PCs running OS X"?
I think Intel Macs are still Macs and are different than PCs. Intel Macs use EFI instead of BIOS which separates it being from a "PC" and I am sure that there are more little differences in between.

IMHO, the last "real" Macs were the ones made with the 68K (680XX) Mototola Chips. But that's just me...

Neptune · Neptune #6 (**permalink**)

11-13-2007, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoolook

Two things make something a Mac, at least now, IMO. Mac OS X and Apple Design. It doesn't matter what is under the bonnet.

But the PowerPC architecture was more "special", right?

baggss · baggss #7 (**permalink**)

11-13-2007, 12:43 AM

I'm not sure what you mean by "special"....

Thundermoon1994 · Thundermoon1994 #8 (**permalink**)

11-13-2007, 12:46 AM

Only if "special" means more limiting. The way I understand it, the Intel architecture makes it easier for software developers to adapt Windoze software to Macs. This increases the number of choices we have.

D3v1L80Y · D3v1L80Y #9 (**permalink**)

11-13-2007, 12:46 AM

A "real" Mac is a nothing more than a computer made by Apple that runs the Mac OS.

baggss · baggss #10 (**permalink**)

11-13-2007, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thundermoon1994

Only if "special" means more limiting. The way I understand it, the Intel architecture makes it easier for software developers to adapt Windoze software to Macs. This increases the number of choices we have.

While one might like to believe that is true, anecdotal evidence would suggest it is not. The major differences between the Windows and Mac OS's are what keeps things from being ported over. That, market-share and ignorance. With bootcamp and Parallels, any push to port major amounts of software is just not there.

PinkLemonade · PinkLemonade #11 (**permalink**)

11-13-2007, 01:53 AM

I do believe that "real" macs use PPC. I keep a number around for very real needs. My white iBook G3 is one of my daily users, and I think that PPC makes it special, different from all the other x86 PC's out there.

Levi · Levi #12 (**permalink**)

11-13-2007, 07:09 AM

I don't think it really matters; PPC isn't any more special than Intel... you really don't know the difference when using the software, and today's Intel Macs offer better performance.

It's like saying a car isn't "really" an Aston Martin because it uses a Rolls Royce engine... it's the other things that make it what it is.

dtravis7 · dtravis7 #13 (**permalink**)

11-13-2007, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoolook

Two things make something a Mac, at least now, IMO. Mac OS X and Apple Design. It doesn't matter what is under the bonnet.

Agreed 1000%. Very good and simple explanation.

Agreed with DB also. Take Mac OSX or even Mac OS in the older days away, it's just a box with IC Chips that does nothing. It's the OS that really has always made the Mac great.

Also all my Macs here but one are PPC based. I have everything from a Plus to iMac G5. I have only the Intel Mini. No Windows on my Intel Mac either!

Leukeh · Leukeh #14 (**permalink**)

11-13-2007, 07:22 AM

It's an Apple branded computer... it runs OS X... it's "real Mac" enough for me!

jram · jram #15 (**permalink**)

11-13-2007, 07:32 AM

I still have a 17in PB that I use everyday, it does everything a new Intel can do. I remember when you would go on any Mac forum and Mac users use to say they hated x86 architecture, little different now. I would never install XP or Vista on my Mac. You ask 10 Mac users now that have new Intels, they all would say they have XP or Vista running, a little phony to me. I can see installing XP if you needed it for school or work, but just to install it makes no sense.

NanoBite #2 (permalink)
Member Since: Oct 27, 2005 Posts: 4,714	11-12-2007, 08:42 PM Not off topic, but just a side note about EFI .... IIRC, Microsoft had first dibs on EFI but in the end asked themselves; "why should we changed over from BIOS to EFI when this change could* have an adverse negative affect on our consumer market". If they changed over then might their buyers go somewhere else? Ergo, why change something that works? I do have the source of this somewhere if it's requested. . Last edited by NanoBite; 11-12-2007 at 08:48 PM.*
	QUOTE Thanks

Thundermoon1994 #8 (permalink)
Member Since: Dec 26, 2006 Location: Kent, OH Posts: 495 Mac Specs: 15" MacBook Pro w/ 2.4 GHz C2D, 4 GB RAM, 250 GB	11-13-2007, 12:46 AM Only if "special" means more limiting. The way I understand it, the Intel architecture makes it easier for software developers to adapt Windoze software to Macs. This increases the number of choices we have. -- Unibody 15.4" MacBook Pro (2.4 GHz Core2Duo Penryn, 250 GB HD, 4 GB RAM, nVidia GeForce 9400M & GeForce 9600M GT w/ 256 MB) -- -- 8 GB iPhone 3G -- 30 GB iPod Video --
	QUOTE Thanks

D3v1L80Y #9 (permalink)
Member Since: Feb 02, 2004 Location: PA Posts: 12,456 Mac Specs: MacBook	11-13-2007, 12:46 AM A "real" Mac is a nothing more than a computer made by Apple that runs the Mac OS. __________________________________________________ Posting and YOU\|Forum Community Guidelines\|The Apple Product Cycle\|Forum Courtesy mac: a waterproof raincoat made of rubberized fabric MAC: a data communication protocol sub-layer, also known as the Media Access Control Mac: a brand name which covers several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc.
	QUOTE Thanks

Levi #12 (permalink)
Member Since: Jul 06, 2007 Location: UK Posts: 681 Mac Specs: MBP : 2.4GHz : 2GB RAM : 256MB VRAM : 160GB HDD	11-13-2007, 07:09 AM I don't think it really matters; PPC isn't any more special than Intel... you really don't know the difference when using the software, and today's Intel Macs offer better performance. It's like saying a car isn't "really" an Aston Martin because it uses a Rolls Royce engine... it's the other things that make it what it is. Koalas: The mafia of the animal kingdom. Now Powered By Leopard.
	QUOTE Thanks

Leukeh #14 (permalink)
Member Since: Apr 22, 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 1,174 Mac Specs: 13" MBP, 2.26GHz, 8gb RAM	11-13-2007, 07:22 AM It's an Apple branded computer... it runs OS X... it's "real Mac" enough for me! Behance Design/Photography Porfolio
	QUOTE Thanks

New To Mac-Forums?

Mac-Forums Brief

Difference between PowerPC and Intel Macs

Hosting and Cloud

Data Centers

Web Development

Performance Marketing

Consumer Tech

Neptune #1 (permalink)
Member Since: Nov 07, 2007 Posts: 27	11-12-2007, 08:20 PM Do you think that the PowerPC Macs are the "real" Macs because the Intel Macs currently use the x86 architecture which is PC standard. Does the PowerPC architecture make Macs "real" Macs and x86 architecture Macs are just "PCs running OS X"? I think Intel Macs are still Macs and are different than PCs. Intel Macs use EFI instead of BIOS which separates it being from a "PC" and I am sure that there are more little differences in between.
	QUOTE Thanks

NanoBite #4 (permalink)
Member Since: Oct 27, 2005 Posts: 4,714	11-12-2007, 09:02 PM Very good response .... The design and OS look/feel is undeniably unique and they are the things that the average user are in touch with most frequently.
	QUOTE Thanks

baggss #7 (permalink)
Member Since: Oct 10, 2004 Location: Margaritaville Posts: 10,308 Mac Specs: 27" 3.4 Ghz i7 iMac-13" C2D Macbook-OSX 18.8.2-64Gb iPad 2-32 Gb iPhone 5-ATV 2-14Tb of Storage	11-13-2007, 12:43 AM I'm not sure what you mean by "special"....
	QUOTE Thanks

PinkLemonade #11 (permalink)
Member Since: May 25, 2007 Posts: 494	11-13-2007, 01:53 AM I do believe that "real" macs use PPC. I keep a number around for very real needs. My white iBook G3 is one of my daily users, and I think that PPC makes it special, different from all the other x86 PC's out there.
	QUOTE Thanks

jram #15 (permalink)
Member Since: Apr 08, 2005 Posts: 472	11-13-2007, 07:32 AM I still have a 17in PB that I use everyday, it does everything a new Intel can do. I remember when you would go on any Mac forum and Mac users use to say they hated x86 architecture, little different now. I would never install XP or Vista on my Mac. You ask 10 Mac users now that have new Intels, they all would say they have XP or Vista running, a little phony to me. I can see installing XP if you needed it for school or work, but just to install it makes no sense.
	QUOTE Thanks

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Aperture PowerPC to Intel Question	McSoappy	Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography	4	03-08-2007 09:17 PM
PowerPC vs Intel Screen	tjmoore	Apple Desktops	5	07-05-2006 06:46 PM
The Intel Macs	Daniel 1989 UK	Schweb's Lounge	13	03-13-2006 04:26 AM
Speed of Apple Intel dev systems impress developers	jram	Apple Rumors and Reports	15	01-12-2006 11:50 PM
Intel, PPC & Apple	RobHague	Apple Rumors and Reports	9	09-27-2005 11:09 AM