New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Other Hardware and Peripherals Other Apple systems and peripherals discussion.

Best hard drive configuration for performance


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
giulio

 
giulio's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 19, 2007
Location: NY USA
Posts: 1,813
giulio is just really nicegiulio is just really nicegiulio is just really nicegiulio is just really nice
Mac Specs: iMac 5.1 | iMac 7.1 | iPod Touch | iPod Nano

giulio is offline
Hi All,
How is everyone today?

Over time, CPUs get more powerful and ram more inexpensive. So the bottleneck of working has shifted to the hard drive. I've given a lot of thought of how to minimize that. So here is my idea...

This assumes you have one 128GB drive. This idea uses partitions instead of physical drives. More drives would give wwaayy more performance (I think). But we are not all so fortunate.

Partitiion the drive as so:
50GB - System and Applications
5GB - System swap space
5GB - Application scratch space
68GB - Users folder (docs, preferences, movies, photos, etc)

The system would be on the inside of the platter. That is the fastest area. Everything should react really snappy. It would not be affected by user preferences, files, scratch, etc.

The system swap space is for virtual memory, temp files, system caches, etc. This area would see lots of read/write usage. Being on it's own partition, it cannot muck up anything else.

The application scratch space would also see lots of read/write usage. Any program that has a scratch disk location preference would use it. Being on it's own partition, it cannot muck up anything else.

The Users folder would contain all the user home folders. Every file and preference gets stored here.

This kind of configuration stops different types of files from mixing physically on the disk.

After coming up with all this, I remember that Red Hat Fedora creates several partitions when installing. I suspect it would be for the same reason.


WHEW! So, what do you think? Please... no posts/links about OSX automatically defragmenting and optimizing. The above is a different and proactive approach.

schweb This has to be one of the best threads ever in MF history...
Cherokee This gets my vote for most innovative thread on Mac-Forums... ever.
QUOTE Thanks
illusionist

 
Member Since: Sep 29, 2007
Posts: 121
illusionist is on a distinguished road

illusionist is offline
interesting approach. when i first clicked the thread, i thought it would be about setting up a RAID 0 with multiple drives.
QUOTE Thanks
giulio

 
giulio's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 19, 2007
Location: NY USA
Posts: 1,813
giulio is just really nicegiulio is just really nicegiulio is just really nicegiulio is just really nice
Mac Specs: iMac 5.1 | iMac 7.1 | iPod Touch | iPod Nano

giulio is offline
Thanks. I was thinking of using different virutal drives, each with it's own function. Instead of having one drive do everything at once.

But I wonder more... this is still one physical drive. So does it matter? Or worse?
QUOTE Thanks
illusionist

 
Member Since: Sep 29, 2007
Posts: 121
illusionist is on a distinguished road

illusionist is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by giulio View Post
Thanks. I was thinking of using different virutal drives, each with it's own function. Instead of having one drive do everything at once.

But I wonder more... this is still one physical drive. So does it matter? Or worse?
imo, hardware RAIDs would perform best. so i would think one physical drive, although faster than normal, would be slower than having multiple physical drives on a RAID.

I'd be curious to see benchmarks though.
QUOTE Thanks
giulio

 
giulio's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 19, 2007
Location: NY USA
Posts: 1,813
giulio is just really nicegiulio is just really nicegiulio is just really nicegiulio is just really nice
Mac Specs: iMac 5.1 | iMac 7.1 | iPod Touch | iPod Nano

giulio is offline
If I had time, money, and a spare machine, I'd love to experiment.
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« hd problems | external HD problems »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hard Drive questions liamkirwan Apple Notebooks 6 08-04-2007 09:39 PM
Internal Hard Drive advice Lloydie Other Hardware and Peripherals 0 01-01-2007 04:15 PM
Considering upgrading your hard drive? kaidomac Apple Notebooks 6 07-19-2006 12:41 PM
Incredible Shrinking Hard Drive LittleBigGuy OS X - Operating System 5 04-14-2005 11:52 PM
Best Hard Drive Configuration? PhilipLeBlanc Apple Desktops 2 05-04-2004 07:11 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?