New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Other Hardware and Peripherals Other Apple systems and peripherals discussion.

Shrinking Hard Drive?


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
Peakoverload

 
Member Since: Feb 13, 2007
Location: Worthing, West Sussex, UK
Posts: 212
Peakoverload has a spectacular aura about
Mac Specs: 27" iMac 3.1Ghz 16GB RAM, 1TB HD. iPhone 4.

Peakoverload is offline
Umm, is this right?

I boought a 750GB external hard drive when I bought my Mac a few months ago but I just looked at it and Finder is saying that it's capacity is only 596.18GB (it's formatted as HFS+). Now I know that any drive once formatted is going to be smaller than unformatted capacit but to loose the best part of 153GB to formatting seems a tad excessive, doesnt it? :confused:
QUOTE Thanks
BIG D 04

 
BIG D 04's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 16, 2006
Location: Birmingham (S), UK
Posts: 665
BIG D 04 is a jewel in the roughBIG D 04 is a jewel in the roughBIG D 04 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: 20" iMac Intel Core Duo 2 (Standard)

BIG D 04 is offline
Yea that can't be the formatting, that's ridiculous.

Damien Healy
iMac 20" OSX 10.4.9 Tiger | thebigman87.com |
QUOTE Thanks
Prise

 
Member Since: Apr 01, 2007
Posts: 81
Prise is on a distinguished road

Prise is offline
Perhaps you have a small partition?

Losing 20% (unless the hard drive is defective with isolated bad sectors facing imminent failure) to formatting would be truly astonishing.
QUOTE Thanks
Thyamine

 
Thyamine's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 23, 2007
Location: Coatesville, PA
Posts: 377
Thyamine will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: MBP 15", 2.33 GHz, 2Gb

Thyamine is offline
This may sound silly, but you aren't using it are you? Is it reporting the free disk space to you (as opposed to the entire size of the drive)? Or if you just formatted it, do you know if there's a 'special' partition: pre-installed software for security, hibernation partition, etc?
QUOTE Thanks
christm

 
christm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 18, 2005
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 2,295
christm is a jewel in the roughchristm is a jewel in the roughchristm is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: ibook g4, imac 2ghz c2d, mbp 2.4ghz c2d - 10.5.1

christm is offline
yh most likely (as others haver said)

a partition you cant see.
or
only showing free disc space.

post a screen shot of what its showing.
QUOTE Thanks
Peakoverload

 
Member Since: Feb 13, 2007
Location: Worthing, West Sussex, UK
Posts: 212
Peakoverload has a spectacular aura about
Mac Specs: 27" iMac 3.1Ghz 16GB RAM, 1TB HD. iPhone 4.

Peakoverload is offline
All I'm doing is Opening Finder, right clicking on the drive and selecting Get Info.

This brings up a window that says:
Capacity 596.18GB
Available 397.39GB
Used 198.79GB

This is a drive that I bought from Apple and that came preformatted as HFS Extended. How can I find out if there are any hidden partitions etc on it?
QUOTE Thanks
cam_macintosh

 
Member Since: Dec 27, 2006
Location: London
Posts: 17
cam_macintosh is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro

cam_macintosh is offline
Send it back.

There's no way that is correct! If it had a windows formatted partition then it would show up on in osx ayway.

I'm sure you've already done it, but open disk utility and have a look at the partition info.
QUOTE Thanks
Slokunshialgo

 
Member Since: Oct 19, 2006
Posts: 152
Slokunshialgo will become famous soon enough

Slokunshialgo is offline
Well, I just did a bit of number crunching. About 99% of drives I ever see don't actually have XXX Binary Gigabytes of storage.

If it is a true 750 GB drive, then it would have 805306368000 bytes of storage. This is following the binary 1024, not the base-ten 1000 multiple. Likely it is using base-ten, making it actually have 750000000000 bytes of storage, which works out to a true 698.491930962 GB.

I've experienced this firsthand when I got myself a 320GB drive, and when I use Linux's cfdisk to partition it (I prefer cfdisk over fdisk, for the Linux-users out there), I can see the exact bit-age, and see that it was closer to 300GB.

So, if it is following the regular standard of Base-ten, then it is a 14.65% loss, rather than the 20.51% loss if it is a true 750GB drive. if it came with more packaging than an electrostatic plastic bag, then check if it says anywhere on it something like "1GB = 1000000000 bytes". if it does, then technically, they are correct, as that is a true usage. it's all a marketing game.

PC: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz, 2 GM RAM, Total 750 GB HDD, Windows Vista Business (For gaming), Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron (64-bit), Slackware 12 (For GTK# coding)
Mac: 1.66GHz, 1GB RAM, 60GB HDD, Mini
QUOTE Thanks
Kash

 
Kash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 9,385
Kash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G

Kash is offline
Slokunshialgo, while you are correct about hard drive companies using base 10 (as opposed to every OS using base 2) resulting in "loss" of space, losing 150GB is rather excessive and definitely not the norm.

I have several drives in my computer and each of them report an approximate 6-7% "loss" in space (this applies for drives that vary in size from 74GB to 250GB). So if we apply a 7% "loss" to this guy's 750GB hard drive, he should only lose 53GB, a far more reasonable number than 150GB.

After sifting a bit through reviews, it seems as though 698GB seems to be what everyone is getting when making one large partition. So my estimate of losing 7% wasn't far off.

Therefore, this definitely isn't a problem of base 10 versus base 2. Looks like the problem lies elsewhere.
QUOTE Thanks
buttuh

 
Member Since: Apr 17, 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 71
buttuh is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 2 GHz C2D MacBook 2GB RAM 80GB HD

buttuh is offline
Have you tried emptying the trash can? I know it sounds silly but it worked for me. Every time I'd delete stuff from my external drive I notice that the total capacity goes down. Then I realized that I would have to empty my trash can to free up that space again.
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« External PS2 Keyboard | External LCD screen rotate? »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Powermac Not Reading Hard Drive rs2sensen Apple Desktops 3 04-04-2007 05:43 PM
Hard Drive Questions Yon Yonson Apple Notebooks 1 07-22-2006 05:57 PM
Considering upgrading your hard drive? kaidomac Apple Notebooks 6 07-19-2006 01:41 PM
Cleaning up uneccessary files / freeing up hard drive space oinkydoodle Switcher Hangout 9 08-17-2005 10:49 AM
Incredible Shrinking Hard Drive LittleBigGuy OS X - Operating System 5 04-15-2005 12:52 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?