03-27-2007, 11:12 AM #31
- Member Since
- Feb 25, 2005
- PB 12inch 1.33ghz 1.25gb/60gb pb 15inch 1.25ghz 1.25gb/160gb Power Mac G3 B&W Overclocked 500mhz
As pointed out, for better or worse, Apple has always made some effort to put out a product here and there that would be considered "revolutionary" (and I use that term with my best Steve impression). Well, to be certain, I think every move they make is self embossed with what Apple deems "the next level." Yeah, there's not too much to deny that the company reeks of self importance.
Is this a bad thing? Not so much.
How else should a business sell a product? As "the most standard of standard?" I don't think many would argue the Apple image is a highly important cog in Steve's machine.
And to their credit, they are mostly successful... I mean I save my apple packaging! And I am sure most of you do to. (I just lie and tell people I'm not crazy and in love with cardboard boxes... I keep 'em for... uh, resale )
Apple's most successful product ever is the iPod. I remember the first iPods... expensive, limited and sexy. People claimed this device would never sell, it cost too much, it's not practical, blah blah.... I think we all know how that ended up.
So... iPhone, Apple TV, etc. They may go the way of the Pippin (Thanks for that! I forgot about that!) or it's possible Apple may have another iPod on it's hands... and that would be most definitely worth it for the company.
Apple TV... not for me at this point. ApTV isn't necessarily a limited market though (anyone downloading iTunes content and owns a modern TV is the target market correct?) With LCD/Plasma soon to be in most homes... by the time ApTV matures some things should align quite nicely!
I think the sour grapes is the fact we are lacking any Mac announcements. Sure, iPhone is a cool looking gadget, but I certainly hope it's not delaying Leopard! I hope all this focus on the Apple TV is not the reason we are waiting on some system refreshes. And the people who really follow this stuff (i.e. not your average consumer... but your tech geek and industry folk) aren't looking for Apple TVs primarily... We want 12inch MBPs and G5 powerbooks (haha).
Apple dropped the "Computer" from it's name... although, all these devices (iPod, iPhone, ApTV) are essentially computers.
...But then so again is my toaster nowadays.
04-03-2007, 10:24 AM #32
- Member Since
- Oct 18, 2006
- Perth, Scotland
- 20-inch 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo iMac
Each to his / her own.
I wanted a decent interface for playing my music on my stereo. I've used a couple of devices which wirelessly stream music, but the displays are tiny and impossible to use when you have a ton of albums by the same artist. Using Apple TV as the interface is brilliant - huge screen allowing me to play whatever I want.
Also - pictures. I take thousands of pics every couple of months but my family never gets to see them - or it they do, it is on my iMac. Being able to call up slideshows on the big screen is great.
I agree that the video podcasts are not that great quality (although some are) and I live in the UK so our iTunes store doesn't even sell movies or TV programmes so I have no comment. I'm sure it will come however, and I'm sure the quality will improve.
04-23-2007, 07:28 PM #33
Sorry for the off topic bit there, I also don't understand Apple TV. $300 to watch your iTunes content on your tv doesn't seem like it's worth it. Doesn't the iPod video export to TV's? If so, couldn't most people do that??
January 2008 Member of the Month
04-24-2007, 08:51 AM #34
I think the problem is in the name. It's not TV, it is just another fancy PC to TV media adapter.
I don't think downloading clips or browsing clips on the PC should be labelled TV.
If it did the sort of things a Slingbox does then it would be great.
05-11-2007, 01:04 PM #35
The cost differential between downloading TV and paying cable is merely temporary, as well. TV ad revenue is dropping like the glide path of a `63 Chevy Biscayne -- this being attributed in large measure to Tivo/DVR (which Nielson either doesn't measure at all or only measures under quite strange protocol).
The networks will soon start charging for download shows more as more folks start accessing programming that way. So I would be cautious in any analysis to justify Apple TV based on cable/satellite savings.
My bigger question (an off topic) is why anyone wants to watch a movie or tv show on a 2.5" iPod screen. After the "revolution" to get every home equipped with a 50" or better plasma tv, watching anything on an iPod just seems, well, faddish.
05-21-2007, 01:16 PM #36momma bearGuest
Also I own tivo with an original lifetime membership so I don't need another item that does half the things my Tivo does.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By CaptSaltyJack in forum Switcher HangoutReplies: 10Last Post: 10-09-2012, 01:10 AM
By quarkrad in forum OS X - Apps and GamesReplies: 8Last Post: 02-18-2011, 11:22 AM
By localfruit in forum OS X - Apps and GamesReplies: 3Last Post: 05-03-2008, 03:07 PM
By milk is white in forum OS X - Operating SystemReplies: 6Last Post: 08-17-2007, 08:20 PM
By PinkPhishDoors in forum Apple Rumors and ReportsReplies: 6Last Post: 10-21-2004, 07:30 AM