New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Other Hardware and Peripherals Other Apple systems and peripherals discussion.

ATA or SDD


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
j0nb0y32

 
j0nb0y32's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 16, 2011
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 402
j0nb0y32 is a jewel in the roughj0nb0y32 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 2.2 i7 + MacBook 2.2 Duo 2 (late 2007) + ATV2 + T/C-2Tb + iPhone4 + iPad2 (64gb wifi)

j0nb0y32 is offline
why is it that the capacity of the Solid State Drive (SDD) very low compared to the ATA hard drive?

I am assuming that the SDD is quicker, given the Apple website description,

"...solid-state drive (SSD), which has no moving parts and delivers increased drive performance for many operations".

however would one really notice the difference in loading applications / documents etc..i thought it is was the memory and speed of the processor that did the 'speed' thing

if this is true, what is the benefit of the SDD?

Thanks in advance
QUOTE Thanks
RavingMac

 
RavingMac's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 07, 2008
Location: In Denial
Posts: 7,645
RavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 4GB Mac Mini 2012, 13" MBA, 15" MacBook Pro OSX 10.7, 32 GB iPhone 3GS, iPad2 64gb 3G

RavingMac is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by j0nb0y32 View Post
why is it that the capacity of the Solid State Drive (SDD) very low compared to the ATA hard drive?

I am assuming that the SDD is quicker, given the Apple website description,

"...solid-state drive (SSD), which has no moving parts and delivers increased drive performance for many operations".

however would one really notice the difference in loading applications / documents etc..i thought it is was the memory and speed of the processor that did the 'speed' thing

if this is true, what is the benefit of the SDD?

Thanks in advance
The capacity is limited because SSDs are still relatively new and expensive.

The speed advantage is due to the fundamental design differences. In any process (and data storage and transfer is a process) the slowest step is the bottle-neck. In this case for ATA and SATA drives it is the electro-mechanical interface between the spinning disk platters and the heads.
In an SSD (solid state drive) this interface is missing and data transfer speeds are limited only by the electronic interface.

All of the above is a simplification, but I hope it helps.

I've always wanted to be smart, handsome and modest. But, I guess I'll have to be satisfied with two out of three . . .
QUOTE Thanks
j0nb0y32

 
j0nb0y32's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 16, 2011
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 402
j0nb0y32 is a jewel in the roughj0nb0y32 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 2.2 i7 + MacBook 2.2 Duo 2 (late 2007) + ATV2 + T/C-2Tb + iPhone4 + iPad2 (64gb wifi)

j0nb0y32 is offline
Thanks

million dolla question;

Given that, as you say it is relatively new on the market, will the increased speed be beneficial for loading and processing applications? compared to the increased cost and low capacity (i say this as pre-installed apps are put on the SDD drive and not the ATA)

currently i am thinking it is not, as i have not experienced the difference

Thanks in advance
QUOTE Thanks
RavingMac

 
RavingMac's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 07, 2008
Location: In Denial
Posts: 7,645
RavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 4GB Mac Mini 2012, 13" MBA, 15" MacBook Pro OSX 10.7, 32 GB iPhone 3GS, iPad2 64gb 3G

RavingMac is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by j0nb0y32 View Post
Thanks

million dolla question;

Given that, as you say it is relatively new on the market, will the increased speed be beneficial for loading and processing applications? compared to the increased cost and low capacity (i say this as pre-installed apps are put on the SDD drive and not the ATA)

currently i am thinking it is not, as i have not experienced the difference

Thanks in advance
Only you can answer that question. It comes down to a cost/benefit analysis, and you are the only one who has the parameters to plug into that equation.

My gut feeling is no.
If you were rich or depended upon the output of this machine for your living (and finding the speed to be hampering you) then yes.

I've always wanted to be smart, handsome and modest. But, I guess I'll have to be satisfied with two out of three . . .
QUOTE Thanks
j0nb0y32

 
j0nb0y32's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 16, 2011
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 402
j0nb0y32 is a jewel in the roughj0nb0y32 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 2.2 i7 + MacBook 2.2 Duo 2 (late 2007) + ATV2 + T/C-2Tb + iPhone4 + iPad2 (64gb wifi)

j0nb0y32 is offline
Razormac - Agreed and thanks
QUOTE Thanks
RavingMac

 
RavingMac's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 07, 2008
Location: In Denial
Posts: 7,645
RavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond reputeRavingMac has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 4GB Mac Mini 2012, 13" MBA, 15" MacBook Pro OSX 10.7, 32 GB iPhone 3GS, iPad2 64gb 3G

RavingMac is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by j0nb0y32 View Post
Razormac - Agreed and thanks
You are very welcome.

I've always wanted to be smart, handsome and modest. But, I guess I'll have to be satisfied with two out of three . . .
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Macbook Pro backup opinions | Palm out of Action - Need Replacement »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ATA external drives to Intel Mini hughvane Other Hardware and Peripherals 7 09-09-2011 08:48 PM
ultra ata vs. ata j00n325 Apple Notebooks 3 12-21-2006 05:59 PM
Sonnet Tempo Serial Ata Issues knemonic Other Hardware and Peripherals 0 08-09-2005 12:13 AM
ata and scsi drives for g4 500mhz grover Apple Desktops 0 01-10-2005 03:09 PM
SCSI vs. ATA - any reason to go SCSI? LFFG Apple Desktops 1 03-17-2004 02:59 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?