New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus • Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts • Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
OS X - Operating System General OS operation information and support

OS 10.5 - Mac has 5x vulnerability flaws as Windows???


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
cramar

 
cramar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 23, 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 93
cramar is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Black MacBook 2GB RAM, 22" Samsung WS monitor, Apple Bluetooth KB & Mighty Mouse, Airport Extreme BS

cramar is offline
A friend who is a XP/Vista user threw this at me—and is gloating!

Mac versus Windows vulnerability stats for 2007:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=758&tag=nl.e622

I don't understand what is going on. How can OS X have all these issues compared to Windows? I know something is serious wrong with this article, since things are not this way in the real world. But I need solid facts to shut down my friend.
QUOTE Thanks
Zoolook

 
Zoolook's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 24, 2006
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 2,751
Zoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud ofZoolook has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: 15" MacBook Pro, i7 2.66Ghz, 8GB RAM, 512GB SSD; iPad 3, iPhone 5

Zoolook is offline
Isn't this like the Firefox vs IE security 'flaws' as well.

Windows packages up all it's security flaws into single fixes (which is why some stay out there for literally months) and also don't publish or even admit to some of the flaws, whereas Apple identify the flaws and fix them as they arise.

You can see this by the fixes, as and when they're released. So a single Windows patch might fix 30 problems.

Now if you add up all the time from the point a vulnerability becomes known to when fixed, and how often it is exploited in the real world during that time, you'd get a very different picture.

Do you know anyone, anyone at all, who's had their Mac hacked or compromised due to a known flaw? Me neither...

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is stoned to death.
- Joan D. Vinge

QUOTE Thanks
technologist

 
Member Since: Mar 30, 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 4,744
technologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 12" Apple PowerBook G4 (1.5GHz)

technologist is offline
It depends on how you count them.

For what it's worth, Secunia lists 26 advisories for Mac OS X in 2007, and 30 for WinXP. Vista had 17.

Last year, Mac OS X had 24, and Windows XP had 46 new advisories.

http://www.secunia.com/
QUOTE Thanks
Alexis

 
Alexis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 20, 2006
Posts: 2,255
Alexis is a jewel in the roughAlexis is a jewel in the roughAlexis is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: Al iMac 20" 2.4Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo

Alexis is offline
What are the total number of flaws though?

XP has been around since 2001 - there could have been 10,000 flaws in 2001, 5000 in 2002, 2500 in 2003 etc.

If OS X has 234 'highly critical' flaws then how come not a single one of the 15 million worldwide OS X users has a single problem with their OS with regards to spyware, trojans, worms, keyloggers or D.O.S. problems?
QUOTE Thanks
karudzo

 
Member Since: May 27, 2006
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 445
karudzo has a spectacular aura about
Mac Specs: Macbook Pro 17" 2.6GHz 4GB RAM

karudzo is offline
Keep in mind that many of these vulnerabilities are ones that were found in the labs or by security researchers and are being fixed even before a true exploit has been developed or found to be "in the wild".
QUOTE Thanks
Kash

 
Kash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 9,385
Kash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G

Kash is offline
You also have to realize that these vulnerability stats are highly skewed as the author includes vulnerabilities in third-party apps for the Mac but not for Windows. So if Adobe has a flaw in its Acrobat program, you'll find it listed for the Mac but not Windows. You can obviously see how this would inflate the Mac vulnerability list, and also where the author's biases lay.


June 2007
July 2009
QUOTE Thanks
knightlie

 
knightlie's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 22, 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,463
knightlie is just really niceknightlie is just really niceknightlie is just really niceknightlie is just really nice
Mac Specs: Lenovo Z560 Hackintosh -:- '06 iMac -:- iPod Touch 2ndGen

knightlie is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoolook View Post
Isn't this like the Firefox vs IE security 'flaws' as well.

Windows packages up all it's security flaws into single fixes (which is why some stay out there for literally months) and also don't publish or even admit to some of the flaws, whereas Apple identify the flaws and fix them as they arise.

You can see this by the fixes, as and when they're released. So a single Windows patch might fix 30 problems.

Now if you add up all the time from the point a vulnerability becomes known to when fixed, and how often it is exploited in the real world during that time, you'd get a very different picture.

Do you know anyone, anyone at all, who's had their Mac hacked or compromised due to a known flaw? Me neither...
Exactly. The article is nonsense - it appears all he's proved is that OSX has more patches than Windows, which is an irrelevant comparison. A very simplified and frankly pretty stupid way of looking at it.

[URL="http://beadia.net"]Beadia[/URL - Jewelry Business Management Software]
I judge you when you use poor grammar.
QUOTE Thanks
bobtomay

 
bobtomay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 22, 2006
Location: Texas, where else?
Posts: 25,017
bobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15" MBP 2.33 C2D 256 4GB, MBA 13" i7 1.8, MB 2.0 2GB, Nano 4th, 3GS, iPad 1

bobtomay is offline
Yep, that's a bogus list. All you have to do is look at the very first vulnerability listed under the Apple side.

It is a Flash vulnerability. Not an OS vulnerability. It is also a vulnerability under almost every OS including XP, as you'll note there is even a link there to MS's technet. But he does not have it listed under the MS side of his list at all. Not only that, but he lists it in December, but when you go to the OS X link, you'll find it is from May of 2006.

The 2nd item is a Linux based packet catcher and dumper application. And well, since it is unix based, it could be compiled on a Mac. Highly unlikely more than a very few, if any, have this little app on an install of OS X though.

Selected multiple links on the Apple side in the month of December. Everyone of them I clicked on besides the first one applied to particular distibutions of Linux. Not a single mention of OS X anywhere. However, they could be compiled and installed in OS X, so he feels this is OK? He's full of xxxx.

What's up with all that. One look - first item is a bug on both sides, but only listed on one? - all I need to see - thank you very much.

I cannot be held responsible for the things that come out of my mouth.
In the Windows world, most everything folks don't understand is called a virus.
QUOTE Thanks
Avid6eek

 
Avid6eek's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 13, 2005
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 350
Avid6eek is an unknown at this point

Avid6eek is offline
OSX isn't as safe as you like to believe. Yes...at the present time it has as many flaws as Windows does. This is true...even though your fanboy goggles may try to blur the facts in front of you. These flaws don't become a problem until they are exploited. The good news for OSX is that those who exploit the flaws, are looking to harm as many people as possible. That is why Windows will get exploited far more that OSX. If OSX has the same market share as Windows, they would both have the same number of exploits. The small market share is what keeps OSX safe, for now.

Desktop Specs: Core 2 Quad Q6600@ 4.0Ghz | Asus P5E X38 Motherboard | 4GB PC8000 DDRII | EVGA GeForce 8800GTX | CL x-Fi Fatal1ty | 4 x Hitachi 73GB 15,000rpm SAS HDs (RAID 0) | Adaptec 3805 SAS Controller | Dual Sony 16X DVD-RW’s | Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW 24" LCD | Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Speakers
QUOTE Thanks
cramar

 
cramar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 23, 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 93
cramar is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Black MacBook 2GB RAM, 22" Samsung WS monitor, Apple Bluetooth KB & Mighty Mouse, Airport Extreme BS

cramar is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avid6eek View Post
OSX isn't as safe as you like to believe. Yes...at the present time it has as many flaws as Windows does. This is true...even though your fanboy goggles may try to blur the facts in front of you. These flaws don't become a problem until they are exploited. The good news for OSX is that those who exploit the flaws, are looking to harm as many people as possible. That is why Windows will get exploited far more that OSX. If OSX has the same market share as Windows, they would both have the same number of exploits. The small market share is what keeps OSX safe, for now.
There may be a deal of truth in the argument that Macs have not been exploited since their numbers are far less than PCs, hence more damage can be done on the Windows side. However, you don't think there are Mac-hating genius hackers out there who are driven by ego? Another successful attack on PCs is nothing special, but being the first to successfully attack Macs on a large scale will guarantee fame and immortality. You don't think this is the ultimate lure? "Captain Crunch" of the 21st Century! The fact that this hasn't happened means that it can't be done (yet, I will qualify).
QUOTE Thanks
Kash

 
Kash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 9,385
Kash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant futureKash has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G

Kash is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avid6eek View Post
OSX isn't as safe as you like to believe. Yes...at the present time it has as many flaws as Windows does. This is true...even though your fanboy goggles may try to blur the facts in front of you. These flaws don't become a problem until they are exploited. The good news for OSX is that those who exploit the flaws, are looking to harm as many people as possible. That is why Windows will get exploited far more that OSX. If OSX has the same market share as Windows, they would both have the same number of exploits. The small market share is what keeps OSX safe, for now.
This idea really needs to die. It's total garbage and has been torn apart many, many times. Like the poster above me, a widespread OS X would be huge for the egomaniacal hacker. Being the first one to institute a massive OS X attack would be a huge notch on one's belt. It would be foolish to think there aren't people out there working feverishly to gain such notoriety.

On, and Macs are a lot more prevalent in the market than you think. Apple laptops comprise of almost half of the number of consumer laptops sold per year. Overall, Macs have at least a 20% share of the consumer market. Apple has sold millions of machines in the past two years and it's looking to sell millions more in 2008. No, I'm not a fanboy, just a realist.


June 2007
July 2009
QUOTE Thanks
karudzo

 
Member Since: May 27, 2006
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 445
karudzo has a spectacular aura about
Mac Specs: Macbook Pro 17" 2.6GHz 4GB RAM

karudzo is offline
Originally Posted by Avid6eek
OSX isn't as safe as you like to believe. Yes...at the present time it has as many flaws as Windows does. This is true...even though your fanboy goggles may try to blur the facts in front of you. These flaws don't become a problem until they are exploited. The good news for OSX is that those who exploit the flaws, are looking to harm as many people as possible. That is why Windows will get exploited far more that OSX. If OSX has the same market share as Windows, they would both have the same number of exploits. The small market share is what keeps OSX safe, for now.


Nonsense. The underpinnings of the OS alone, FreeBSD, is far more secure than Windows anyday. The old argument that hackers just go after Windows may be a bit accurate, but that has nothing to do with how secure OS X is. Security firms are pounding away at most OS's in hopes of finding flaws. As long as humans write code, flaws will be found. In most cases, these flaws are fixed before an exploit is out to the general public. Hackers no doubt know how to get into most systems, but it behooves them to keep most of their secrets to themselves for the most part.

Stay safe- stay away from Windows, run chkrootkit every now and then and be sensible in how you use your computer. A little common sense goes a long ways.
QUOTE Thanks
smartyMAC

 
smartyMAC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 20, 2007
Location: Land of Rising Sun
Posts: 337
smartyMAC will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: MB White 160GB, 2GB RAM,

smartyMAC is offline
Windows Vista + XP has only 44 vulnerabilities!!!!! What a joke. If that's the case what does those "frequent" security updates from MS contain?? Are those vulnerabilities also counted? MS is so known to manipulate the survey results. If they say windows has only 44 vulnerabilities, why they are still easily breakable by the hackers.... It's rare to see a windows machine unbreakable out of box. Any OS has bugs and that's why we get the security updates from the vendor. But the inherent architecture of MAC (UNIX) is much much less prone to large scale damage than any windows system. Out-of-box permissions on MAC ensure that the damage is mostly local to the user home area and doesn't get any further.
QUOTE Thanks
rman

 
rman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 24, 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 12,591
rman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: 2 x 3.0GHz Quad-Core, 6GB OS X 10.6.8 | 15in MacBook Pro 2.2GHz OS X 10.6.8 | 64GB iPad 2 WiFi

rman is offline
it just shows you the writer of the article has no knowledge of unix.

Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass, It's about learning to dance in the rain!
QUOTE Thanks
cramar

 
cramar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 23, 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 93
cramar is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Black MacBook 2GB RAM, 22" Samsung WS monitor, Apple Bluetooth KB & Mighty Mouse, Airport Extreme BS

cramar is offline
Fascinating article in Forbes about U.S. Army turning to Macs more for security reasons:

http://www.forbes.com/home/technolog..._1221army.html

With international terrorists and anti-Mac hackers now forcusing on Macs, we'll know for sure in the the next couple of years whether the season of innocence is over!

Apple still has a major ace up their sleeve. That >$15B cash can be used to keep their software and reputation secure.
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« libm and ruby | External mouse causing the OS to hang randomly!!! »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iPod for Windows and Mac? MacAddikt iPod Hardware and Accessories 12 03-31-2007 09:33 AM
IMAC QUESTIONS- Your expert opinons requested Sweej1 Apple Desktops 6 09-26-2006 07:05 AM
Running Windows on my iMac! BlindingLights Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac 27 04-19-2006 05:40 PM
Many questions from xperienced Windows user just got a Mac :) Fedorov Apple Desktops 9 02-01-2006 08:09 PM
Mac Users Get More ISP Choices schweb Apple Rumors and Reports 1 03-06-2003 10:57 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?